Category A Prisoner

[lookout]

No, but it does prove the kind of person you really are.

That's your problem,you think you know everything about " kinds of persons ",but you're sorely wrong.

[Stephanie]

I've mentioned this before Steph - I've never said June didn't have a black eye because I know fine well that she did.

I must have missed the post. But it's very interesting none the less.

[Caroline]

That's your problem,you think you know everything about " kinds of persons ",but you're sorely wrong.

Mo, just those that speak volumes and you're one of them! 

[Caroline]

Lookout, PLEASE stop being so defensive. There was no threat from me but you were so quick to turn it into one by asking "Or" that I feel I may have touched a nerve. You were also very quick to imply that it would be wrong of me to suggest that you might not be telling the truth, yet very clearly you often get your facts very wrong.

That's an understatement! 

[JackiePreece]

I found it equally bizarre that you tried to imply you were' best friends' with a Wakefield MP'

Oh dear !

[Caroline]

Who is your post directed towards?

I think it was you H.

[guest154]

Why does he need to have been violent? He murdered for gain for for pleasure. Try doing some research because you post dross - you're making silly assumptions because you don't know enough about it!

Jackie thinking JEREMY needs to have a violent past to be guilty, shows her complete lack of any understanding of the case and of Jeremy.

He doesn't need a violent past. He needs a past that shows he is willing to do anything for financial gain, even if that is at the expense of his own family.

He has it!!

[guest154]

As for this topic. This is a great find and can be used to counter the arguements that

1. Jeremy has been nothing but normal in prison.
2. His 27 assessments show him as fine and dandy.
3. We know about his mental health. We really don't, all we have access to is Sheilas.

But I shall use this finding each and everytime a supporter uses the OS claim of 27 assessments or claim that prison staff wanted Jeremy lowered in his prison catergory and that it would have happened as far back the EARLY 90's if it wasn't for the relatives.

Really good find.

[guest2181]

As for this topic. This is a great find and can be used to counter the arguements that

1. Jeremy has been nothing but normal in prison.
2. His 27 assessments show him as fine and dandy.
3. We know about his mental health. We really don't, all we have access to is Sheilas.

But I shall use this finding each and everytime a supporter uses the OS claim of 27 assessments or claim that prison staff wanted Jeremy lowered in his prison catergory and that it would have happened as far back the EARLY 90's if it wasn't for the relatives.

Really good find.

If they have used psychological reports as a reason for JB to remain as a Category A prisoner, then yes, it makes a bit of a mockery of the various claims.

[lookout]

NOBODY " needs" a violent past in order to be a murderer at all.What tosh !

[Jane]

NOBODY " needs" a violent past in order to be a murderer at all.What tosh !

It's certainly not compulsory.

[Stephanie]

NOBODY " needs" a violent past in order to be a murderer at all.What tosh !

That I do agree with!

[Caroline]

NOBODY " needs" a violent past in order to be a murderer at all.What tosh !

So you agree that Jackie writes tosh? 

[lookout]

So you agree that Jackie writes tosh? 

Stop making/causing trouble and grow up for Christ's sake. Jackie knows me better than that !!

[Caroline]

Stop making/causing trouble and grow up for Christ's sake. Jackie knows me better than that !!

Not me making trouble, it was JACKIE who implied that in order to be a murderer, you needed a violent background. You said the idea was TOSH.