Author Topic: Category A Prisoner  (Read 13588 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #15 on: February 19, 2016, 01:39:PM »
Think our posts must have overlapped Lookout...

This is what the judge said when he denied JB's application for a downgrade of prison status:

"The review team had not been perverse to accept psychological reports showing category A status was justified"





What sort of a review team was it ? The cleaning staff ?

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #16 on: February 19, 2016, 02:03:PM »
Judgement regarding prison category dating from 1998:

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #17 on: February 19, 2016, 02:10:PM »
I've not read it all yet but have skimmed down to point 6 which I find very interesting. It seems JB lied to his legal team about having applied to complete courses and the Courts picked up on this..


"The committee noted that while your solicitors had stated on your behalf that you had applied to undertake various courses, reports from Long Lartin and Wakefield indicated that you had been unwilling to undertake offence related courses
« Last Edit: February 19, 2016, 02:19:PM by stephanie »
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #18 on: February 19, 2016, 02:20:PM »
This is what SH did in 2012 to his then prison solicitor David McCorkill and I picked up on it, resulting in both SH and his solicitor turning on me and suggesting I didn't know what I was talking about or words to that effect.. 
« Last Edit: February 19, 2016, 02:23:PM by stephanie »
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #19 on: February 19, 2016, 02:26:PM »
This is what SH did in 2012 to his then prison solicitor David McCorkill and I picked up on it, resulting in both SH and his solicitor turning on me and suggesting I didn't know what I was talking about or words to that effect..

I should add that it was over a small detail - which may be insignificant to some but a lie or half truth is a lie imo.

I believe the above resulted in the following article http://insidetime.org/honesty-no-longer-the-best-policy-4/
which should never have been allowed to be published imo as it caused more harm than good and is still doing so.

It's a factor for how and why prisoners like JB continue to exploit the public...
« Last Edit: February 19, 2016, 02:31:PM by stephanie »
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Neil

  • Guest
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #20 on: February 19, 2016, 02:34:PM »
I've not read it all yet but have skimmed down to point 6 which I find very interesting. It seems JB lied to his legal team about having applied to complete courses and the Courts picked up on this..


"The committee noted that while your solicitors had stated on your behalf that you had applied to undertake various courses, reports from Long Lartin and Wakefield indicated that you had been unwilling to undertake offence related courses
It says that he had applied to do various courses.  His solicitors didn't claim that he had applied to undertake 'offence' related courses. 

That's how I read it, anyway!

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #21 on: February 19, 2016, 02:42:PM »
It says that he had applied to do various courses.  His solicitors didn't claim that he had applied to undertake 'offence' related courses. 

That's how I read it, anyway!

They were referring to offence related courses Neil. To be downgraded from an A cat to a B cat he would have been required to complete offence related courses - meaning he had never applied to do the courses in the first place.

I'm not sure what other courses you have in mind?

He clearly didn't apply to complete offence related course as if he had the prisons would not have been able to prove he had been unwilling to complete the courses.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2016, 02:53:PM by stephanie »
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #22 on: February 19, 2016, 02:46:PM »
I should add that it was over a small detail - which may be insignificant to some but a lie or half truth is a lie imo.

I believe the above resulted in the following article http://insidetime.org/honesty-no-longer-the-best-policy-4/
which should never have been allowed to be published imo as it caused more harm than good and is still doing so.

It's a factor for how and why prisoners like JB continue to exploit the public...






How true that honesty is not now the best policy !!

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #23 on: February 19, 2016, 02:49:PM »
How true that honesty is not now the best policy !!

I strongly disagree!

And that certainly does not apply to someone who has murdered 5 members of their family, including 6 year old twins, or with someone who has murdered a 79 year old women.

Even more so if they are genuinely innocent or maintains innocence - what reason would they have to lie then? None!
« Last Edit: February 19, 2016, 03:13:PM by stephanie »
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #24 on: February 19, 2016, 02:50:PM »
It says that he had applied to do various courses.  His solicitors didn't claim that he had applied to undertake 'offence' related courses. 

That's how I read it, anyway!

I see your point but believe you are mistaken.

The solicitors said that JB had applied to take courses, but after checks were made it turns out that the prisons actually indicate that JB was unwilling to take any courses.


Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #25 on: February 19, 2016, 02:56:PM »
How true that honesty is not now the best policy !!

If you cannot be honest Lookout then how can you expect anyone to take you seriously?
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #26 on: February 19, 2016, 02:58:PM »
If you cannot be honest Lookout then how can you expect anyone to take you seriously?

And if you are lying what are you trying to cover up?
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #27 on: February 19, 2016, 03:09:PM »
I see your point but believe you are mistaken.

The solicitors said that JB had applied to take courses, but after checks were made it turns out that the prisons actually indicate that JB was unwilling to take any courses.

What I don't understand is why the solicitors wouldn't have asked for supportive evidence before the hearing, as opposed to just taking JB's word for it? Bit slack don't you think? Or am I missing something?
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #28 on: February 19, 2016, 03:14:PM »
What I don't understand is why the solicitors wouldn't have asked for supportive evidence before the hearing, as opposed to just taking JB's word for it? Bit slack don't you think? Or am I missing something?

I guess so, but then it is worded as being stated on JB's behalf, so I guess it isn't being stated as a fact by the solicitors, but is merely a recital of what is being claimed by their client.

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Category A Prisoner
« Reply #29 on: February 19, 2016, 03:26:PM »
I guess so, but then it is worded as being stated on JB's behalf, so I guess it isn't being stated as a fact by the solicitors, but is merely a recital of what is being claimed by their client.

But the solicitors aren't representing him in a criminal trial they are representing him in relation to prison law.. Bit of a difference. I would have expected the solicitors to have checked their facts before presenting them.
The solicitors would have known about JB's prison files - all they had to do was ask for copies from JB regarding this aspect i.e. his OASyS report or it's equivalent back then.
https://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/offenders/psipso/pso/PSO_2205_offender_assessment_and_sentence_management.doc

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offender_Assessment_System

This is yet another ALARM BELL and I haven't yet read all of the report!
« Last Edit: February 19, 2016, 03:32:PM by stephanie »
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"