Author Topic: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:  (Read 80967 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #900 on: May 27, 2015, 01:33:PM »





Why are you making such a big deal over this ? There are heaps of other things that I find more revolting.






This is my other " bold,sweeping statement " to match the first one. ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17250
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #901 on: May 27, 2015, 01:45:PM »
if jeremy told colin such photos its a pretty nasty thing to do i cant defend that.

its funny brett colins seems to have nothing to say about the case ethere for or agianst jerermy i allways wonder why.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2015, 01:47:PM by nugnug »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #902 on: May 27, 2015, 01:46:PM »
if jeremy told colin such photos its a pretty nasty thing to do i cant defend that.

Exactly Nugs, at least you have the decency to admit it.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #903 on: May 27, 2015, 01:46:PM »





This is my other " bold,sweeping statement " to match the first one. ;D ;D ;D ;D

Sadly YOU don't.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #904 on: May 27, 2015, 01:54:PM »
nugnug well said regarding the photo's.  I have wondered about Brett too why he did not support Jeremy and it makes me think maybe he thought Jeremy was guilty of the murders and therefore wanted to distance himself from Jeremy just a thought I have no proof of this.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #905 on: May 27, 2015, 02:09:PM »
nugnug well said regarding the photo's.  I have wondered about Brett too why he did not support Jeremy and it makes me think maybe he thought Jeremy was guilty of the murders and therefore wanted to distance himself from Jeremy just a thought I have no proof of this.

My thinking too, Susan.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #906 on: May 27, 2015, 02:51:PM »





Why are you making such a big deal over this ? There are heaps of other things that I find more revolting.


Lookout, I can't believe that I feel the necessity to clarify this, but it SOUNDS as if you're saying that there was little/nothing wrong with Jeremy trying to sell porny pics of Sheila. Where would you rate it on a scale of 1-10?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #907 on: May 27, 2015, 03:36:PM »

Lookout, I can't believe that I feel the necessity to clarify this, but it SOUNDS as if you're saying that there was little/nothing wrong with Jeremy trying to sell porny pics of Sheila. Where would you rate it on a scale of 1-10?






I can't believe the hoo-ha about it on here. Just count how many posts you've made of the same thing,it's bordering on paranoia.
I've already said that I can't see Sheila doing anything like that and I mean it.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #908 on: May 27, 2015, 03:52:PM »





I can't believe the hoo-ha about it on here. Just count how many posts you've made of the same thing,it's bordering on paranoia.
I've already said that I can't see Sheila doing anything like that and I mean it.

You certainly have!! You've also resorted to saying -though how you can possibly know beats me- that she was immune to the effects of the drugs she's been rumoured to have spent thousands on, but you ARE missing the point, are you not? It really isn't relevant whether or NOT Sheila posed for these pictures. The point IS that Jeremy SAID she did and offered them for sale. YOU may brush it aside as being no more than hoo-ha. I'm more inclined to see it as despicable, an act of unspeakably bad taste and down right scummy.....................and you've managed to side step my question. 
« Last Edit: May 27, 2015, 03:54:PM by April »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #909 on: May 27, 2015, 04:21:PM »
You certainly have!! You've also resorted to saying -though how you can possibly know beats me- that she was immune to the effects of the drugs she's been rumoured to have spent thousands on, but you ARE missing the point, are you not? It really isn't relevant whether or NOT Sheila posed for these pictures. The point IS that Jeremy SAID she did and offered them for sale. YOU may brush it aside as being no more than hoo-ha. I'm more inclined to see it as despicable, an act of unspeakably bad taste and down right scummy.....................and you've managed to side step my question.






Ah,but Jeremy tells lies,does he not ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #910 on: May 27, 2015, 04:43:PM »





Ah,but Jeremy tells lies,does he not ?

For someone so rigid about improprieties, I'm HUGELY surprised at your refusal to answer my question. You surely can't claim to be without an opinion on this point when you have SUCH fixed opinions on others so I'll put the question again. As you seem to think that trying -but failing- to sell porny pics of his dead sister was something barely worth mentioning, in terms of propriety, where would you place it on a scale of 1-10

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #911 on: May 27, 2015, 04:44:PM »





Ah,but Jeremy tells lies,does he not ?

Yes.
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest154

  • Guest
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #912 on: May 27, 2015, 04:45:PM »
Yes.

Quite big ones.

But I believe SOME supporters would support Bamber no matter what.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #913 on: May 27, 2015, 04:52:PM »
Yes.






Whoppers-----------when it came to describing the photo's maybe ?

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #914 on: May 27, 2015, 06:02:PM »
if jeremy told colin such photos its a pretty nasty thing to do i cant defend that.

its funny brett colins seems to have nothing to say about the case ethere for or agianst jerermy i allways wonder why.

Brett Collins liked living the good life with Jeremy. With Jeremy jailed he needed to find someone else to go party with. People like that have multiple people they party with anyway they don't have a solitary friend- they spread themselves all around.

What would you expect him to do after Jeremy was found guilty?  To go around to the press trying to get them to print that he insists Jeremy is innocent even though the evidence proved otherwise?  Why would he bother?

If he saw a good chance of Jeremy winning an appeal maybe then he would have stuck around expecting Jeremy to spread his wealth when he got out but other than that one would expect him to simply party with his other friends and forget about Jeremy.

« Last Edit: May 27, 2015, 06:03:PM by scipio_usmc »
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry