Author Topic: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:  (Read 80801 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #870 on: May 27, 2015, 10:40:AM »
Ar but, Jeremy didn't sell em and the Sun made a bigger story in regards to his and Brett's approach...saving them a lot money, time and effort. What a scoop lol  ;D ;D ;D ;D

He only didn't sell them because The Sun didn't WANT them. I don't understand why people are defending his INTENTION - the intention is the point that is not only distasteful, it's down right disgusting and shows the man's character. Someone who could do that, is capable of anything
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #871 on: May 27, 2015, 10:44:AM »
Hello Patti

I think Colin did believe the pictures were explicit because he was worried about where they were going to end up and this is why he posted a letter to Jeremy asking for the photo's so he could destroy them and just because Colin did not go into details of the photo's in his book does not mean Jeremy had not given him details of the type of photo's they were I for one thinks he did.  Jeremy left two sets of nude photo's for Colin why did he remove the third set?

Colin didn't go into detail out of respect for Sheila - but he did say that the description in The Sun was the same as that told to him by Jeremy. He tried to sell the pictures, of that, there is no doubt.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #872 on: May 27, 2015, 10:55:AM »
Colin didn't go into detail out of respect for Sheila - but he did say that the description in The Sun was the same as that told to him by Jeremy. He tried to sell the pictures, of that, there is no doubt.

Caroline I agree Colin said very little about the photo's in his book out of respect for Sheila the Mother of his wee boys but I am in no doubt he was told just how explicit they were why did he write to Jeremy asking for them back on the morning they were published but he was too late then he wrote again to Jeremy expressing is absolute anger  after he saw the headlines in the Sun. If the pictures were just straight forward nude shots why not leave them with the other two sets of nude photo's he removed them because they were just a little more than nude pictures sex snaps as the Sun called them.  All very sad IMO.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #873 on: May 27, 2015, 11:25:AM »
I can't imagine that Sheila would have even posed for " explicit " pics,as she had remained guarded on the type of pics that were taken. She just wasn't THAT type of model. Topless maybe,but I again imagine that even this went beyond what she herself had in mind.
It's this part of the whole scenario that I can't understand as her character didn't fit in with mucky pics.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #874 on: May 27, 2015, 11:35:AM »
As for Brett and those like him,they don't rate women's bodies anyway so he'd have been at the forefront of any suggestions of selling, regardless of who it was. The man was ruthless and I wouldn't have thought,a " good friend " for Jeremy to have had.  Look how he was over the antiques,certainly not backward in coming forward when it came to pointing out the value of certain household objects.
I just think he was a bad influence on Jeremy,as he was the root cause in RWB hiring a private detective to see what they " got up to ".

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17250
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #875 on: May 27, 2015, 11:47:AM »
I can't imagine that Sheila would have even posed for " explicit " pics,as she had remained guarded on the type of pics that were taken. She just wasn't THAT type of model. Topless maybe,but I again imagine that even this went beyond what she herself had in mind.
It's this part of the whole scenario that I can't understand as her character didn't fit in with mucky pics.

yes i thought that as well i cant she her posing for the pictures described.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #876 on: May 27, 2015, 11:50:AM »
Caroline I agree Colin said very little about the photo's in his book out of respect for Sheila the Mother of his wee boys but I am in no doubt he was told just how explicit they were why did he write to Jeremy asking for them back on the morning they were published but he was too late then he wrote again to Jeremy expressing is absolute anger  after he saw the headlines in the Sun. If the pictures were just straight forward nude shots why not leave them with the other two sets of nude photo's he removed them because they were just a little more than nude pictures sex snaps as the Sun called them.  All very sad IMO.

I agree, he made it clear that they were described by Jeremy that they were 'anything BUT' simple nude shots. He also said he 'had a feeling' that Jeremy would try to sell them - hence the letter. It is sad and quite unbelievable that an innocent man could do such a thing!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #877 on: May 27, 2015, 11:50:AM »
I can't imagine that Sheila would have even posed for " explicit " pics,as she had remained guarded on the type of pics that were taken. She just wasn't THAT type of model. Topless maybe,but I again imagine that even this went beyond what she herself had in mind.
It's this part of the whole scenario that I can't understand as her character didn't fit in with mucky pics.



If she'd been as high on drugs as you've sometimes painted her as having been, any inhibitions would have flown out of the window so anything would have been possible.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #878 on: May 27, 2015, 11:51:AM »
yes i thought that as well i cant she her posing for the pictures described.

If Jeremy made up the explicit pictures, that makes it even WORSE!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #879 on: May 27, 2015, 11:54:AM »
I can't imagine that Sheila would have even posed for " explicit " pics,as she had remained guarded on the type of pics that were taken. She just wasn't THAT type of model. Topless maybe,but I again imagine that even this went beyond what she herself had in mind.
It's this part of the whole scenario that I can't understand as her character didn't fit in with mucky pics.

Never having met Sheila, you have no idea what she would or wouldn't do. But if the photo's didn't exist, it means 'dear old Jeremy' made them up - what kind of 'grieving' brother would do  that to his recently deceased sister?? Despicable!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #880 on: May 27, 2015, 11:55:AM »
yes i thought that as well i cant she her posing for the pictures described.

Hello nugnug
Colin was shocked when he saw the totally nude photo's that had been taken of Sheila in her garden at the flat he said she told him she would never go into glamour modelling but he was even more worried about the ones Jeremy had removed from her flat think about it why would Jeremy want explicit photo's of Sheila :'(

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #881 on: May 27, 2015, 11:57:AM »
Hello nugnug
Colin was shocked when he saw the totally nude photo's that had been taken of Sheila in her garden at the flat he said she told him she would never go into glamour modelling but he was even more worried about the ones Jeremy had removed from her flat think about it why would Jeremy want explicit photo's of Sheila :'(

I can't even imagine why people are still denying even the nude shots didn't exist - Colin SAW them  ;D ;D ;D ;D.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #882 on: May 27, 2015, 12:25:PM »
she was a model it doesnt take a genuis to work out there might be nude pictures of her.

If you read Colins book the press were everywhere and questioning every relative ,friend and neighbour. They were even hounding colins partners father . So anyone who knew the photos even might have existed could have told them . They were extremely intrusive  to the extent that they nearly got punched on a few occasions. 

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #883 on: May 27, 2015, 12:27:PM »
1. Why do you keep saying this when you surely must know it makes you look and sound like a ****?
2. Why don't you ever say it to others?

Don't worry  I have him on selective ignore . But I did warn him if he said it again I would start getting personal in my replies to him - so I might now just start doing that. I have given him enough chances .

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The meeting with The Sun newspaper:
« Reply #884 on: May 27, 2015, 12:30:PM »
I will carry in thanks but I think selling pictures of your sister who you have just murdered is beyond emendation - but hey, that's just me! I couldn't care less what people are convinced of - he tried to sell them and the evidence is there! If people still wish to defend such a person it's their business and for their conscience!

I am not defending him at all and I am glad your conscience is now clear.

I just said even in your  new found truth it is one liar against another which makes it even harder to get to the truth.

That is different to defending him .