Yes that's correct, but was he aware of the location of the bullets when he compiled his reports? It also states that NB had 8 gun shot wounds with 7 bullets entering his body. What does this mean? I assume that you can have a wound but that the bullet doesn't actually enter the body? He also states that it appeared that NB had put up a spirited defence?
The problem I have with all these experts is that they appear to home in on their specific area and appear to overlook all the other evidence
I'm not sure what the set up was in '85/'86 but nowadays these things seem to take a multi-disciplinary approach eg all bring area of expertise to the table before drawing final overall conclusions
Its the same with the blood sample found in the silencer was Hayward aware of the buckets of blood stained clothing in the kitchen from the SOC officer and the potential for accidental or deliberate contamination? It strikes me again and again that there's a real breakdown in communication between the different experts.
I understand JB was a competition standard shooter. He must have realised NB was his biggest obstacle so I struggle with JB as the perpertrator as I don't think he would have let NB leave the bedroom. He could have fired those four fatal shots in the bedroom.
In any event Patti was do you anticipate proving or disproving by the location of bullets? Or have you just turned super geeky/slipped into Asperger's mode

I would imagine so NN he was a pathologist and he was able to determine more that the average Joe at court. However, this does not mean that all his findings are justified in the highest degree. Like I said in his opinion the 4 shots were fatal as reflected in his 3rd statement.
Nevill had 8 shots one of which exited, in my opinion this bullet if found would have been found in the main bedroom. Hartley would have you believe that it fragmented into Nevill's chest. I don't go with that, because if it had there would have been another entry wound.
He also confirms that the black eyed were due to the bullet wounds. The laceration on NB's nose could be argued against, because it is not clear if these were done by the coal Scuttle, due to a fall, butt of the rifle or had been subjected to a punch in the face...sorry to be blunt, but there is no other way to describe it.
I would say that Vanezes would have been an expert in his field and that his reports have been to the best of his ability, but at the end of the day not all experts in their fields are correct and if they are based on assumptions and opinions, then this is where caution applies.
