Author Topic: Mark Webster  (Read 6781 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: Mark Webster
« Reply #30 on: December 06, 2012, 07:52:PM »
  Steve, Your last Post #29, It is observed that you are up on Speed on this one.

  However, back in Post #22, I feel I must call you to account here.
  Hopefully, I shall be glad if I may, to put
         the situation right, on your assertion- 'Can't Answer Questions!'
  When an interviewee feels a question  is inane, vacuuos, or possibly intentionally incriminating, he may sensibly, and rightfully express his right to silence. The simple and legal way to fill in the questionnaire  wll be to put on the record - ' The Accused did not answer/reply!'




Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Mark Webster
« Reply #31 on: December 06, 2012, 08:01:PM »
  Steve, Your last Post #29, It is observed that you are up on Speed on this one.

  However, back in Post #22, I feel I must call you to account here.
  Hopefully, I shall be glad if I may, to put
         the situation right, on your assertion- 'Can't Answer Questions!'
  When an interviewee feels a question  is inane, vacuuos, or possibly intentionally incriminating, he may sensibly, and rightfully express his right to silence. The simple and legal way to fill in the questionnaire  wll be to put on the record - ' The Accused did not answer/reply!'


And when one considers that many of the questions put to Jeremy fell under the heading of "inane, vacuous and possibly intended to incriminate" he quite sensibly and rightfully expressed his right to silence. IMO

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: Mark Webster
« Reply #32 on: December 06, 2012, 08:05:PM »
  Steve, Your last Post #29, It is observed that you are up on Speed on this one.

  However, back in Post #22, I feel I must call you to account here.
  Hopefully, I shall be glad if I may, to put
         the situation right, on your assertion- 'Can't Answer Questions!'
  When an interviewee feels a question  is inane, vacuuos, or possibly intentionally incriminating, he may sensibly, and rightfully express his right to silence. The simple and legal way to fill in the questionnaire  wll be to put on the record - ' The Accused did not answer/reply!'

It might just once in awhile be apposite to remember why Jeremy has been incarcerated for 27 years,instead of bringing up the coffee table he made as a 16-year-old in woodwork lessons at Gresham's..
« Last Edit: September 20, 2014, 10:07:PM by Steve_uk »

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Mark Webster
« Reply #33 on: December 06, 2012, 08:18:PM »
It might just once in awhile be apposite to remember why Jeremy has been incarcerated for 27 years,instead if bringing up the coffee table he made as a 16-year-old in woodwork lessons at Gresham's..


Apposite to nothing I've said Steve. I have no recall of ever holding a conversation with you during which I've spoken of coffee tables, but as it seems to be of interest to you, my cousin made a small sideboard during his last year at school and it's still providing good service 50 years on.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Mark Webster
« Reply #34 on: December 06, 2012, 08:20:PM »

Apposite to nothing I've said Steve. I have no recall of ever holding a conversation with you during which I've spoken of coffee tables, but as it seems to be of interest to you, my cousin made a small sideboard during his last year at school and it's still providing good service 50 years on.
They don't make them like that anymore, April ;D ;D

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: Mark Webster
« Reply #35 on: December 06, 2012, 08:25:PM »
They don't make them like that anymore, April ;D ;D



They certainly don't, Maggie ;D ;D

Offline hourglass

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 378
Re: Mark Webster
« Reply #36 on: December 06, 2012, 08:28:PM »
  Roch, thankyou for your imput with the portrait of the Lug family.
  I was wondering if there was some connotation from Cockney rhyming slang. Maybe XiLi can help here?

No good ask me about Cockney Rhyming slang.  I am not from there.  We watch TV the other night and someone make joke about "A Sherman Tank" and everyone ROTF & LAO and I did not understand so I ask and everyone being making fun of me since.

Offline hourglass

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 378
Re: Mark Webster
« Reply #37 on: December 06, 2012, 08:39:PM »

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: Mark Webster
« Reply #38 on: September 14, 2014, 12:03:PM »
The report at the start of this thread has now been added to the library.

jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1119.0.html

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Mark Webster
« Reply #39 on: September 14, 2014, 12:20:PM »
thank you

I had not read that before . It is interesting.

And I guess again emphasises that it is all about the moderator. The conviction did hinge on that and the jury were misled.

But agree it still begs the question , if it was used why would either of them put it away in a bag in the cupboard ( if it was Jeremy with visible blood and a hair on the outside)


Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Mark Webster
« Reply #40 on: September 14, 2014, 12:28:PM »
I'm assuming it would only have been in the kitchen area as because Neville was downstairs for most of the time,he was the only one with the " lighter,greying hair. Plus of course the skewed actions of it having been cumbersome as it slid down the fire surround leaving " squiggly " marks.
Jeremy would have held it firm,but Sheila would clearly have been off-balance with it,as it added inches to the already long rifle.