Author Topic: Re: Forum - split topic  (Read 62926 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nuala

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • I am not a number
Re: Forum - split topic
« on: April 29, 2012, 03:18:AM »

Someone's been handing out magic mushrooms again!

Mat you do amuse me though!!

You tell a great 'story'

Jackie,

This is an unacceptable personal attack, no more of these, please.

Offline Nuala

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • I am not a number
Re: Re: Forum - split topic
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2012, 03:19:AM »
« Sent to: JackiePreece on: Today at 12:22 AM » ReplyQuoteDelete

If you don't back off, I'm going to report you to people who can make your silly life hell.

There are reasons you sent out 23 private messages last month but only got 4 replies. You're a mad woman who people don't deal with.

I can see what I want  - as you can tell by the pirvate message thing - don't annoy me.


Mat,

The above threat to Jackie is totally unacceptable.

Some of your comments about the mods are equally out of order.

I have had to spend far too much time this evening watching your posts because you goad other members - and I am not happy about this.

It's too late for the mods to discuss now, so it will have to wait until tomorrow.

I advise you not to push your luck any further.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Re: Forum - split topic
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2012, 03:21:AM »
You're so wrong. I didn't even say that to her! Find the post I said that in, she's making it up.

I also haven't dissed any mods. I think most of them are decent.


guest154

  • Guest
Re: Re: Forum - split topic
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2012, 03:22:AM »
And also ask any mod/admin if they deleted that post. They will say no - it didn't exist!

G

  • Guest
Re: Re: Forum - split topic
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2012, 10:03:AM »
And also ask any mod/admin if they deleted that post. They will say no - it didn't exist!
I think they are talking about an alleged pm you are supposed to have sent Jackie, Mat?

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6670
Re: Re: Forum - split topic
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2012, 11:29:AM »
I checked with an admin before I said anything and was assured it was okay because there are no rules against it.

Mat - you did not check with me.  I have never had a PM from you.  Are you suggesting you checked with Mike?


Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Re: Forum - split topic
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2012, 11:36:AM »
You're so wrong. I didn't even say that to her! Find the post I said that in, she's making it up.

I also haven't dissed any mods. I think most of them are decent.


Mat you know full well that you threatened me by PM and for someone who is meant to be a barrister/lawyer/inside man at the ccrc you dont seem to be up to date with technology.
all my pms are not just on the forum account they go straight to my hotmail account.  But fortunately from the threats you have made they can be dealt with by the police and I should think by tomorrow we will have your real name and everyone here can get on with the real job of getting an innocent man out of prison
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline ajross

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 538
Re: Re: Forum - split topic
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2012, 11:41:AM »
Well that is unfortunate behaviour as on the whole I thought that Mat had stimulated some interesting debate and discussion. I find it very disappointing that in the few weeks i have been here things sem to always degrade into a malicious and spiteful personal assault

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Re: Forum - split topic
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2012, 11:56:AM »
Ajross luckily for us trolls follow a pattern and start off being very nice but in a very short period of time show their true colours.

At the moments because of the events of last week there is lots to organise to bring this case further into the public eye and I have to time for anyone who comes on this forum as timewasters.

The ccrc must have been laughing their socks off over the last few weeks because the prime time documentary that should have helped Jeremy was actually mauled by a section of his own campaigners.
This was not done privately but publically.
I am sure the CCRC sat around the table and were laughing because they obviously thought that would be the end to any more PRIME TIME documentaries that would force their hand to refer.
I bet they couldn't believe their luck in the run up to the decision.
Well there is more than enough evidence available to do a longer hard hitting documentary which will expose more lies and deception and let's hope that happens very soon.
Jeremy has some of the best people in the media behind him at the moment and I have no time for chancers like Mat coming on here to disrupt the good work of the forum.

I will find out who he really is
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Re: Forum - split topic
« Reply #9 on: April 29, 2012, 01:04:PM »
Quote
I also haven't dissed any mods. I think most of them are decent.

Mat there are only two mods and one admin at present.  Are you referring to a previous era, when you first registered?  Neither my self nor ChKeira have pm'd you about another forum member, in the manner you suggested.

G

  • Guest
Re: Re: Forum - split topic
« Reply #10 on: April 29, 2012, 01:19:PM »

Mat you know full well that you threatened me by PM and for someone who is meant to be a barrister/lawyer/inside man at the ccrc you dont seem to be up to date with technology.
all my pms are not just on the forum account they go straight to my hotmail account.  But fortunately from the threats you have made they can be dealt with by the police and I should think by tomorrow we will have your real name and everyone here can get on with the real job of getting an innocent man out of prison
Well when I met you, you seemed perfectly sane to me and very astute and sensible.

G

  • Guest
Re: Re: Forum - split topic
« Reply #11 on: April 29, 2012, 01:26:PM »
Ajross luckily for us trolls follow a pattern and start off being very nice but in a very short period of time show their true colours.

At the moments because of the events of last week there is lots to organise to bring this case further into the public eye and I have to time for anyone who comes on this forum as timewasters.

The ccrc must have been laughing their socks off over the last few weeks because the prime time documentary that should have helped Jeremy was actually mauled by a section of his own campaigners.
This was not done privately but publically.
I am sure the CCRC sat around the table and were laughing because they obviously thought that would be the end to any more PRIME TIME documentaries that would force their hand to refer.
I bet they couldn't believe their luck in the run up to the decision.
Well there is more than enough evidence available to do a longer hard hitting documentary which will expose more lies and deception and let's hope that happens very soon.
Jeremy has some of the best people in the media behind him at the moment and I have no time for chancers like Mat coming on here to disrupt the good work of the forum.

I will find out who he really is
I think it has been demonstrated quite well when a recent injunction that a certain public figure put on his private affair was made a joke of when Twitter published everything that was supposed to be covered by that injunction. That public opinion can be quite powerful and no amount of restrictions put there by "the law" can make any difference at all. That is why the government want to control the internet so much and they are actually trying at this very moment to limit its power by various means. The public is the best place to go in my opinion as the "law" has let us down so much through corruption within its ranks.

Offline Nuala

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • I am not a number
Re: Re: Forum - split topic
« Reply #12 on: April 29, 2012, 01:41:PM »
Mat there are only two mods and one admin at present.  Are you referring to a previous era, when you first registered?  Neither my self nor ChKeira have pm'd you about another forum member, in the manner you suggested.


That's a good question, Rochford. As neither you nor I, the current mods, nor NGB (admin), have pm'd Mat in the manner he suggests, I too would like to know which mods Mat is suggesting sent him pms about Jackie.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Re: Forum - split topic
« Reply #13 on: April 29, 2012, 06:37:PM »
Mat there are only two mods and one admin at present.  Are you referring to a previous era, when you first registered?  Neither my self nor ChKeira have pm'd you about another forum member, in the manner you suggested.

Yeah, the last time I was here Jackie did the same kind of thing and I was told that I could talk about anything in a PM aslong as it wasn't private. There are no rules against it, if there are direct me to them.

Jackie, I did send you a PM but it was NOTHING like what you claim, you've either edited your photogrpah or quoted my pm and then endited the quote.

If I'd said that, which I didn't, I would know that you'd run to a mod (even though it isnt on the forum so, what?)


Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: Re: Forum - split topic
« Reply #14 on: April 29, 2012, 06:44:PM »
Mat what photograph?

That's how it's spelt by the way?

Please inform us what the message said before I allegedly changed it

We better get the Internet police in  8)
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill