Damning Evidence kept back by Ann Eaton/Barbara Wilson - threats to kill by SC

[Roch]

Was Babs Wilson a slut?

Rock - eeeeeee! Please tell the next part before we think you've turned into a raging sexist.

Sorry Choch, I just got the impression that Babs was fond of a bitch slapping.  I'll delete these messages tomorrow when I'm sober... (I'm not sexist really and I'm CRB checked) x

You do call ladies "birds" though, Rochy!! XXX.

That's the problem when deleting messages "tomorrow". Someone has already copied it by then.

Apologies for crude messages.  Too much ale in a short period of time.  I was just being daft regarding Babs Wilson.  Apologies to Babs also.

[jon]

Hartley , do you believe the statement at the beginning of this thread should have been shown to the court , the court that tried JB ?

[Hartley]

Hartley , do you believe the statement at the beginning of this thread should have been shown to the court , the court that tried JB ?

Can you tell me your reason for posing this question to me please?

[jon]

Hartley , do you believe the statement at the beginning of this thread should have been shown to the court , the court that tried JB ?

Can you tell me your reason for posing this question to me please?

I am interested in your view as you believe JB is guilty , if you prefer i will pose the question to all those who believe JB guilty !!

[Hartley]

Hartley , do you believe the statement at the beginning of this thread should have been shown to the court , the court that tried JB ?

Can you tell me your reason for posing this question to me please?

I am interested in your view as you believe JB is guilty , if you prefer i will pose the question to all those who believe JB guilty !!

I think really we need to look at Barbara's statements before we can come to any other conclusions at all.

A statement was made by her on 26/11/85 which only details the telephones, she also made a statement on 27/9/85 which is not available on this forum.

[ngb1066]

Hartley , do you believe the statement at the beginning of this thread should have been shown to the court , the court that tried JB ?

Can you tell me your reason for posing this question to me please?

I am interested in your view as you believe JB is guilty , if you prefer i will pose the question to all those who believe JB guilty !!

I think really we need to look at Barbara's statements before we can come to any other conclusions at all.

A statement was made by her on 26/11/85 which only details the telephones, she also made a statement on 27/9/85 which is not available on this forum.

Hartley - Have you read the 27/09/85 statement made by Barbara Wilson?  If so can you tell us what it contains?

 

[jon]

Hartley , do you believe the statement at the beginning of this thread should have been shown to the court , the court that tried JB ?

Can you tell me your reason for posing this question to me please?

I am interested in your view as you believe JB is guilty , if you prefer i will pose the question to all those who believe JB guilty !!

I think really we need to look at Barbara's statements before we can come to any other conclusions at all.

A statement was made by her on 26/11/85 which only details the telephones, she also made a statement on 27/9/85 which is not available on this forum.

May i ask why ? If you were shown it to be a fact that she made this statement , do you believe it should have been shown to the court that tried JB , regardless of any other statement she did or did not make ?

[Hartley]

Hartley , do you believe the statement at the beginning of this thread should have been shown to the court , the court that tried JB ?

Can you tell me your reason for posing this question to me please?

I am interested in your view as you believe JB is guilty , if you prefer i will pose the question to all those who believe JB guilty !!

I think really we need to look at Barbara's statements before we can come to any other conclusions at all.

A statement was made by her on 26/11/85 which only details the telephones, she also made a statement on 27/9/85 which is not available on this forum.

Hartley - Have you read the 27/09/85 statement made by Barbara Wilson?  If so can you tell us what it contains?

No I haven't NGB, but I would like to.

[Hartley]

Hartley , do you believe the statement at the beginning of this thread should have been shown to the court , the court that tried JB ?

Can you tell me your reason for posing this question to me please?

I am interested in your view as you believe JB is guilty , if you prefer i will pose the question to all those who believe JB guilty !!

I think really we need to look at Barbara's statements before we can come to any other conclusions at all.

A statement was made by her on 26/11/85 which only details the telephones, she also made a statement on 27/9/85 which is not available on this forum.

May i ask why ? If you were shown it to be a fact that she made this statement , do you believe it should have been shown to the court that tried JB , regardless of any other statement she did or did not make ?

I am slightly confused. Which statement are you referring to then?

Do you mean this attachment?

[jon]

Hartley , do you believe the statement at the beginning of this thread should have been shown to the court , the court that tried JB ?

Can you tell me your reason for posing this question to me please?

I am interested in your view as you believe JB is guilty , if you prefer i will pose the question to all those who believe JB guilty !!

I think really we need to look at Barbara's statements before we can come to any other conclusions at all.

A statement was made by her on 26/11/85 which only details the telephones, she also made a statement on 27/9/85 which is not available on this forum.

May i ask why ? If you were shown it to be a fact that she made this statement , do you believe it should have been shown to the court that tried JB , regardless of any other statement she did or did not make ?

I am slightly confused. Which statement are you referring to then?

Do you mean this attachment?

Yes maybe statement is the wrong word , my question is , do you think this should have been shown to the court , and the people mentioned in it asked to explain ?

[jackiepreece]

Jon
Don't hold your breath

[grahameb]

Hartley , do you believe the statement at the beginning of this thread should have been shown to the court , the court that tried JB ?

Can you tell me your reason for posing this question to me please?

I am interested in your view as you believe JB is guilty , if you prefer i will pose the question to all those who believe JB guilty !!

I think really we need to look at Barbara's statements before we can come to any other conclusions at all.

A statement was made by her on 26/11/85 which only details the telephones, she also made a statement on 27/9/85 which is not available on this forum.

Am I right in assuming that this note was unsigned as well?

[Hartley]

Hartley , do you believe the statement at the beginning of this thread should have been shown to the court , the court that tried JB ?

Can you tell me your reason for posing this question to me please?

I am interested in your view as you believe JB is guilty , if you prefer i will pose the question to all those who believe JB guilty !!

I think really we need to look at Barbara's statements before we can come to any other conclusions at all.

A statement was made by her on 26/11/85 which only details the telephones, she also made a statement on 27/9/85 which is not available on this forum.

May i ask why ? If you were shown it to be a fact that she made this statement , do you believe it should have been shown to the court that tried JB , regardless of any other statement she did or did not make ?

I am slightly confused. Which statement are you referring to then?

Do you mean this attachment?

Yes maybe statement is the wrong word , my question is , do you think this should have been shown to the court , and the people mentioned in it asked to explain ?

The point I was making is that I would need to be convinced that it wasn't, hence why I would like to see all of Wilsons statements. In it's current form it doesn't really amount to very much.

[mike tesko]

Hartley , do you believe the statement at the beginning of this thread should have been shown to the court , the court that tried JB ?

Can you tell me your reason for posing this question to me please?

I am interested in your view as you believe JB is guilty , if you prefer i will pose the question to all those who believe JB guilty !!

I think really we need to look at Barbara's statements before we can come to any other conclusions at all.

A statement was made by her on 26/11/85 which only details the telephones, she also made a statement on 27/9/85 which is not available on this forum.

May i ask why ? If you were shown it to be a fact that she made this statement , do you believe it should have been shown to the court that tried JB , regardless of any other statement she did or did not make ?

I am slightly confused. Which statement are you referring to then?

Do you mean this attachment?

Yes maybe statement is the wrong word , my question is , do you think this should have been shown to the court , and the people mentioned in it asked to explain ?

The point I was making is that I would need to be convinced that it wasn't, hence why I would like to see all of Wilsons statements. In it's current form it doesn't really amount to very much.

Typical response....

Yet, when Robert Boutflour recounted an alleged conversation he had with Jeremy about security at the caravan park, where Boutflour alleged Jeremy said he could quite easily kill his parents, suddenly this was an important piece of evidence which the prosecutions case was built around and upon...

Selective evidence, thats what the prosecutions case is/was all about...

If information existed to suggest that Sheila believed all people were bad, and that they all should die, this is evidence that should have been brought to the attention of the court, and to the attention of her psychiatrist...

If Sheila made such comments, then of course it was and is relevant to the five deaths which happened at whf, particularly because Essex police originally were prepared to accept that Sheila killed everyone, and then herself...

[Hartley]

Hartley , do you believe the statement at the beginning of this thread should have been shown to the court , the court that tried JB ?

Can you tell me your reason for posing this question to me please?

I am interested in your view as you believe JB is guilty , if you prefer i will pose the question to all those who believe JB guilty !!

I think really we need to look at Barbara's statements before we can come to any other conclusions at all.

A statement was made by her on 26/11/85 which only details the telephones, she also made a statement on 27/9/85 which is not available on this forum.

May i ask why ? If you were shown it to be a fact that she made this statement , do you believe it should have been shown to the court that tried JB , regardless of any other statement she did or did not make ?

I am slightly confused. Which statement are you referring to then?

Do you mean this attachment?

Yes maybe statement is the wrong word , my question is , do you think this should have been shown to the court , and the people mentioned in it asked to explain ?

The point I was making is that I would need to be convinced that it wasn't, hence why I would like to see all of Wilsons statements. In it's current form it doesn't really amount to very much.

Typical response....

Yet, when Robert Boutflour recounted an alleged conversation he had with Jeremy about security at the caravan park, where Boutflour alleged Jeremy said he could quite easily kill his parents, suddenly this was an important piece of evidence which the prosecutions case was built around and upon...

Selective evidence, thats what the prosecutions case is/was all about...

If information existed to suggest that Sheila believed all people were bad, and that they all should die, this is evidence that should have been brought to the attention of the court, and to the attention of her psychiatrist...

If Sheila made such comments, then of course it was and is relevant to the five deaths which happened at whf, particularly because Essex police originally were prepared to accept that Sheila killed everyone, and then herself...

No, I don't think that amounted to very much either.

Do you have Wilsons other stayements and would you consider posting them, she made four in total as I understand it.