Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?

[Kaldin]

In the event Jeremy Bamber wins an appeal has a retrial and is accquited. Would JM face any legal proceedings??

Possibly - for perjury, if it could be proved. However, when other defendants are acquitted, the witnesses against them aren't usually prosecuted - in rape cases, for example.

[Jane]

No, but without Julie's evidence, there was really only the silencer evidence. Everything else was fluff and speculation.

You see, it's this anomaly which concerns me about ANY case. A witness may be found to have said -or not said- something which leads to a convicted person being freed. However, being freed on a technicality doesn't make them innocent. When this sort of thing occurs, I start to get noble cause corruption. I must start to take my own heeding on board that we can never get anything 100% correct.

[Kaldin]

You see, it's this anomaly which concerns me about ANY case. A witness may be found to have said -or not said- something which leads to a convicted person being freed. However, being freed on a technicality doesn't make them innocent. When this sort of thing occurs, I start to get noble cause corruption. I must start to take my own heeding on board that we can never get anything 100% correct.

Hmmm, I'm not sure it would be a technicality. If that did happen, would it not be Julie's fault for doing the deal with the NOTW, involving a lot of money? 

[Jane]

Hmmm, I'm not sure it would be a technicality. If that did happen, would it not be Julie's fault for doing the deal with the NOTW, involving a lot of money?

I can see a determination to blame her for something, not that I'm suggesting it was alright for her to lie. I'd be interested to know if it was her decision or if she was told it would be 'acceptable'?

[Kaldin]

I can see a determination to blame her for something, not that I'm suggesting it was alright for her to lie. I'd be interested to know if it was her decision or if she was told it would be 'acceptable'?

Well look, if Julie did a deal with the NOTW whereby she gained a financial advantage dependent on a guilty verdict, do you not see how that could affect her credibility? I'm surprised her evidence was allowed tbh.

[Kaldin]

It was blood money - end of. Disgusting.

[Jane]

Well look, if Julie did a deal with the NOTW whereby she gained a financial advantage dependent on a guilty verdict, do you not see how that could affect her credibility? I'm surprised her evidence was allowed tbh.

I can, indeed, but it doesn't transform a guilty Jeremy into an innocent one.

[Caroline]

Well look, if Julie did a deal with the NOTW whereby she gained a financial advantage dependent on a guilty verdict, do you not see how that could affect her credibility? I'm surprised her evidence was allowed tbh.

Not really, if she had a deal with the NOTW when she came forward with her story, I can see that would make a difference.

[Caroline]

It was blood money - end of. Disgusting.

So was the inheritance.

[Kaldin]

I can, indeed, but it doesn't transform a guilty Jeremy into an innocent one.

Without Julie's evidence, what else is there? The silencer - that's about it.

[Kaldin]

So was the inheritance.

Inherited by the relatives? I agree. It should have gone to charity.

[Caroline]

Inherited by the relatives? I agree. It should have gone to charity.

I don't think that's for us to say really - if Bamber is guilty, they were next in line.

[Kaldin]

I don't think that's for us to say really - if Bamber is guilty, they were next in line.

They made sure of that. I can say it if I like. There was a lot of money to be made with a guilty verdict. The evidence relating to the finding of the silencer was relevant - everything else was fluff.

[Caroline]

They made sure of that. I can say it if I like. There was a lot of money to be made with a guilty verdict. The evidence relating to the finding of the silencer was relevant - everything else was fluff.

Well, that's your opinion - but just because you rubbish Julie's testimony, doesn't make it wrong. Not much of  afence sitter are you? 

[Kaldin]

Well, that's your opinion - but just because you rubbish Julie's testimony, doesn't make it wrong. Not much of  afence sitter are you? 

Oh I am. I make no secret of my opinion of Julie Mugford and the relatives. However, I haven't accused them of fabricating evidence, or making things up.