Author Topic: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.  (Read 48253 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #270 on: September 05, 2019, 10:25:PM »
Lookout, Neville's head was smashed in with the rifle butt but I don't recall any tissue being found on that. It




Because the piece of the butt that broke off was never examined-----come to think, it wasn't spoken of much at all.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #271 on: September 06, 2019, 12:47:AM »



Because the piece of the butt that broke off was never examined-----come to think, it wasn't spoken of much at all.

So tissue and bone would only cling to that one piece of the rifle?  ???
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #272 on: September 06, 2019, 07:00:AM »
So tissue and bone would only cling to that one piece of the rifle?  ???


I'd have thought that tissue and bone would have adhered more to, and been more visible on a broad wooden surface than a more smaller metal one.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #273 on: September 06, 2019, 07:08:AM »
Yes but one bullett would not have killed him or stopped him disarming Sheila. That is if she fired one bullet & it was accurrate.

However if Sheila had a shot gun or powerful hand gun... 

Not sure Nevill would have tried to talk Sheila down. Maybe briefly. He would want her disarmed as soon as possible.

That "he would want her disarmed as soon as possible" very much suggests that Nevill did not, as you do, write the weapon off as being "weak". If it just so happened that the woman, whose knowledge of guns could be written on a postage stamp, pulled the trigger and accidentally aimed correctly, he'd be no less dead, mthan if he'd been shot by a marksman.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #274 on: September 06, 2019, 08:27:AM »
That "he would want her disarmed as soon as possible" very much suggests that Nevill did not, as you do, write the weapon off as being "weak". If it just so happened that the woman, whose knowledge of guns could be written on a postage stamp, pulled the trigger and accidentally aimed correctly, he'd be no less dead, mthan if he'd been shot by a marksman.

It took 8 bullets (6 in the head) and a brutal beating by Bamber to kill Nevill.

If Sheila somehow fired one accurrate bullet into Nevill's torso when he took the rifle off her, that would not stop him. It would irritate him as he would not be able to go straight back to bed.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #275 on: September 06, 2019, 08:50:AM »
It took 8 bullets (6 in the head) and a brutal beating by Bamber to kill Nevill.

If Sheila somehow fired one accurrate bullet into Nevill's torso when he took the rifle off her, that would not stop him. It would irritate him as he would not be able to go straight back to bed.

He was shot twice in the jaw/neck, once in the arm and one bullet grazed his torso. He was then shot another four times in the head later after he was already dead.

Get your facts right.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #276 on: September 06, 2019, 08:58:AM »
He was shot twice in the jaw/neck, once in the arm and one bullet grazed his torso. He was then shot another four times in the head later after he was already dead.

Get your facts right.

Jaw, neck. Just as bad as a head shot.

Bamber shot him 4 times in the head after the brutal kitchen beating. Nevill would have been knocked out as Bamber hit him so hard the rifle stock broke. However Nevill would have still been breathing,  so Bamber shot him 4 times in the head.

The slim chance of Sheila hitting Nevill with a torso shot would not have deterred or stopped him.

Nevill ringing Bamber after Sheila started shooting the twins. Get real.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2019, 08:58:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #277 on: September 06, 2019, 09:00:AM »
So tissue and bone would only cling to that one piece of the rifle?  ???





Always supposing that it was the rifle used----yes. As I said, it was more or less ignored so far as evidence was concerned.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #278 on: September 06, 2019, 09:13:AM »
Where was the rear staircase off the kitchen ? Where did it lead to ?

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #279 on: September 06, 2019, 09:30:AM »
Jaw, neck. Just as bad as a head shot.

Bamber shot him 4 times in the head after the brutal kitchen beating. Nevill would have been knocked out as Bamber hit him so hard the rifle stock broke. However Nevill would have still been breathing,  so Bamber shot him 4 times in the head.

The slim chance of Sheila hitting Nevill with a torso shot would not have deterred or stopped him.

Nevill ringing Bamber after Sheila started shooting the twins. Get real.

The pathologist testified that he only had a “little time” left to live after the initial four shots upstairs. The shots to the arm, jaw/neck and torso was all in quick succession.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #280 on: September 07, 2019, 09:48:PM »
Regarding the posts the other day, this is the area where the trails go out of view.
« Last Edit: September 08, 2019, 08:55:AM by Roch »

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #281 on: September 07, 2019, 09:59:PM »
Regarding the posts the other day, this is the area where the trails go out of view.

What about them?

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #282 on: September 07, 2019, 10:04:PM »
What about them?

It's not a very good image but they appear to fade and taper.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #283 on: September 07, 2019, 10:14:PM »
What about them?

What I am interested in trying to understand is the exact difference between yours and Caroline's opinion on these marks.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: so wheres this forensic breakthrough then.
« Reply #284 on: September 07, 2019, 10:17:PM »
It's not a very good image but they appear to fade and taper.

They seem to smudge yes. I believe this is what created what seems to be be fingers marks but are not.