Who approached who regarding the silencer ? Don't be scared.

[Jan]

Adam wont answer questions when he finds himself cornered.

No he has distraction tactics . And then when he does get shown an answer he claims not to have seen it .

Just to make you repeat it again .

He also has a short memory when it suits him .

But where would we be without  him? 🙂

[David1819]

Just posts on a forum , not sure that is accurate. He is here nearly every day , posts hundreds or even thousands of times and is obsessed with starting new threads .

He belives Jeremy is guilty and is in the right place so he reason for doing so is not clear . I don’t think just posting on a forum serves his “interest “ in the case justice . so to speak .

But from his point of view justice has been done. That's what I don't get. Why bother?

I believe Mark Lundy is guilty. I also believe Darlie Routier is guilty. Every now and then I will post on the forums about them. But I don't post day in day out years on end shoving dogma down their supporters throats.

[Steve_uk]

But from his point of view justice has been done. That's what I don't get. Why bother?

I believe Mark Lundy is guilty. I also believe Darlie Routier is guilty. Every now and then I will post on the forums about them. But I don't post day in day out years on end shoving dogma down their supporters throats.

One reason is that the general public will browse this site from time to time and should be reminded of the diablerie perpetrated by this man, who in one form or another should not be free to associate at will with the world outside.

[David1819]

One reason is that the general public will browse this site from time to time and should be reminded of the diablerie perpetrated by this man, who in one form or another should not be free to associate at will with the world outside.

You and Adam are certainly not increasing public confidence in the safety of Jeremy's conviction. If anything you two achieve the opposite with nonsensical, illogical and even comical arguments.

The same applies to Mike but in reverse. People get the impression the guy is guilty because of Mikes nonsensical, illogical and comical arguments to support Jeremy.

I know this because when I first joined. Adams stupid posts were creating doubts in my mind. While Mike was claiming Jeremy was innocent because of some magic psychic pogs had the opposite effect.

[Steve_uk]

You and Adam are certainly not increasing public confidence in the safety of Jeremy's conviction. If anything you two achieve the opposite with nonsensical, illogical and even comical arguments.

The same applies to Mike but in reverse. People get the impression the guy is guilty because of Mikes nonsensical, illogical and comical arguments to support Jeremy.

I know this because when I first joined. Adams stupid posts were creating doubts in my mind. While Mike was claiming Jeremy was innocent because of some magic psychic pogs had the opposite effect.

We all have our own style, and yours is scientific casuistry illustrated at will with memes whether they be earnest or jocund, though all are for our intents and purposes irrelevant. Mike and lookout I would place in a category of their own: ersatz parents whom Jeremy would claim as his own, more akin to Leslie and Juliet than June and Nevill.  You'd be lucky to be counted in the second category along with the other unfathomable and umbrageous posters such as Jackie and others who were so objectionable they had to be banned.

[Caroline]

I was not levelling that at all the “ guilty” posters at all .

I was talking about Adam .

But what you said would apply to all guilty supporters? "We believe Jeremy is guilty and is in the right place" so why do we post on the forum? For the discussion. 

[Jan]

But what you said would apply to all guilty supporters? "We believe Jeremy is guilty and is in the right place" so why do we post on the forum? For the discussion.

Some do some don’t.

Personally I don’t think Adam discusses . When he gets an answer he does not like he ignores it and starts another thread .

It’s like he treats it as a competition to post the most and create threads the most .

IMO

[Caroline]

Some do some don’t.

Personally I don’t think Adam discusses . When he gets an answer he does not like he ignores it and starts another thread .

It’s like he treats it as a competition to post the most and create threads the most .

IMO

So why else would they post?

[lookout]

Some do some don’t.

Personally I don’t think Adam discusses . When he gets an answer he does not like he ignores it and starts another thread .

It’s like he treats it as a competition to post the most and create threads the most .

IMO

Hi Jan--------sorry I missed you yesterday.

I thoroughly agree with your post and couldn't have put it better.

[Adam]

It seems that no supporters are going to say who approached who. Jan has just tried to deflect attention onto me.

This is disappointing but predictable. As me & SteveUK said earlier today, people support Bamber for non evidence reasons.

[lookout]

And with guilters it's a copy-cat " evidence reason " in which had already been blagged by both the relatives and EP resulting in nothing new which also amounts to " non-evidence ".

[Adam]

And with guilters it's a copy-cat " evidence reason " in which had already been blagged by both the relatives and EP resulting in nothing new which also amounts to " non-evidence ".

I don't include you in this thread.

You believe Sheila's blood went into the silencer while she was taking the silencer off.

[Jan]

It seems that no supporters are going to say who approached who. Jan has just tried to deflect attention onto me.

This is disappointing but predictable. As me & SteveUK said earlier today, people support Bamber for non evidence reasons.

I don't get involved in supposition .

I am still asking questions .

How would I know what happened with the silencer ? But I do find it odd that there were no statements when the police collected it , the family don't mention it in Sept and when they do mention it they are very vague about when the police collected it .

And yet this is the one piece of evidence that  sealed Jeremys fate.

If the family did not think it was important why hand it over and why chase up on the 11th sept to find out what had happened to it ?

The relationship between the family police is complicated - shouting and arguing with some   , getting their point across by using a policeman from another force to feed information and get information back , and then sitting at a table with a vital bit of evidence in front of them drinking whisky with another officer who just wrapped it up in a bit of cardboard or tissue .

I am still not sure exactly how the silencer was handled by the family either before it was collected , so why on earth would I have the audacity to assume what happened to it on its journey ?

So that is why I don't answer your question.

But I don't believe it was on the end of the gun when the last shots were fired .