The Case Of Mike Tesko

[mike tesko]

I am also preparing an additional application to the CCRC, to get my convictions quashed, in relation to the burglary of a retired judges house, in Peakley hill, Derbyshire, involving the theft of £25,000 worth of silverware...

[mike tesko]

I shall also be taking steps to be compensated for the five and a half months that I was falsely imprisoned in 1986...

[mike tesko]

I shall also be taking steps to be compensated for the five and a half months that I was falsely imprisoned in 1986...

This is the case where two bent coppers from Barnsley, who were part of a No.3 regional crime squad campaign, claimed they were inside an observation van when they invented an identification of me, but the van they both claimed to have been inside at 5.20pm, on the 22nd January, 1986, was still parked up in the police compound at Barnsley, and was not sent for until 5.30pm, and not actually parked up in the street until 5.55pm. One of the bent coppers (DC Caulfield) who fabricated that evidence which served to keep me on remand for five and a half months, never got charged with perjury or perverting the course of justice, or anything and he later went on to become an inspector at Barnsley...

Corruption in South Yorkshire police goes deep..

[mike tesko]

I have lodged a new application with the CCRC to get my case back to the court of appeal to get my convictions in relation to 'the bungalow matters', reheard, because in the 42 page judgement the judges did not deal with all the grounds of appeal which the Registrar at the appeal court invited me to lodge. The judgement went 'missing', according to the CCRC, but it resurfaced after the CCRC turned my last application down in 2009...

DS Higham did not testify at the appeal hearing at the Court of Appeal in London, 1994, but dodgy DC Richardson did. This time, the full police interviews of DC Richardson, and DS Higham, under caution, will form a significant part of my CCRC application. None of these interviews were available to me as part of my case, in September, 1988, so the contents fall into the category of fresh evidence...

[mike tesko]

I am going to be carrying out my own review of the case relied upon to convict me of 10 burglaries,at Sheffield Crown Court, between the 12th and the 22nd September, 1988. I think I should begin by referring to the depositions, given by DC Richardson, and ADS Dyson, who both testified at the committal proceedings held at Barnsley Magistrates Court, on the 1st December, 1987...

Here is 'DC Richardsons' deposition' from the aforementioned committal proceedings:-

[mike tesko]

My analysis of the Richardson deposition, starts with his reference to the amount of time which elapsed, between him originally knocking on the door, to it being opened, by the male occupier...

3 minutes, in which, all the jewellery was gathered up off the lounge carpet, and put into a plastic woolworth carrier bag, which the man known as 'George' took into the rear bedroom to conceal it and its contents beneath the bed mattress, return to the hallway, and climb up into the loft, and replace the loft cover...

My take on this set of alleged events - nigh on impossible...

[mike tesko]

My analysis of the Richardson deposition, starts with his reference to the amount of time which elapsed, between him originally knocking on the door, to it being opened, by the male occupier...

3 minutes, in which, all the jewellery was gathered up off the lounge carpet, and put into a plastic woolworth carrier bag, which the man known as 'George' took into the rear bedroom to conceal it and its contents beneath the bed mattress, return to the hallway, and climb up into the loft, and replace the loft cover...

My take on this set of alleged events - nigh on impossible...

How did the man managed to get into the loft without aid of a set of steps, or a chair, or something upon which for him to stand on?

That guy must have been fast as xxxx, to do all that in three minutes, thats' all I can say...

[mike tesko]

Think about it, three xxxxxxx minutes, to gather up a bag full of jewellery, without leaving any fingerprints upon over 100 individual items of jewellery, or indeed, the woolworths plastic carrier bag, itself...

[mike tesko]

Think about it, three xxxx xxx minutes, to gather up a bag full of jewellery, without leaving any fingerprints upon over 100 individual items of jewellery, or indeed, the woolworths plastic carrier bag, itself...

DC Richardson was talking 'bull shit' when he gave his deposition, at the committal proceeding, thats' all I can say...

I can't see how anybody could have done everything he needed to have done, and get himself into the loft within three minutes, in order for DC Richards account to be remotely true,or accurate...

[mike tesko]

No sooner does the door get opened by a male occupier, than DC Richardson is cautioning the man for handling stolen goods, to which according to DC Richardson, the man simply replies, 'Yes'...

This can't be true, because nothing stolen had yet been found, the police had not even yet got into the bungalow, its' bullshit...

[mike tesko]

According to Richardsons' account, once he entered the bungalow, he searched all the rooms of the property, and only saw a woman occupier. He does not know that a man has allegedly climbed up into the loft, and done everything else he is supposed to have done, beforehand - it just doesn't add up...

[mike tesko]

Then, DS Higham miraculously appears alongside DC Richardson beneath the loft opening, and without any prompting by anybody, before the police had searched any cupboards, or wardrobes in the bungalow, or looked under any bed, or behind any settee, DS Higham jumps up and knocks the loft cover out of the way, which according to DC Richardson, the cover fell to the floor...

I wonder why the same loft cover did not fall to the floor when the man hurriedly climbed up into the loft...

[mike tesko]

Now, according to Richardsons account, the man in the loft stood there in full sight, allowing Richardson and Higham to speak to him, and for them both to make a positive identification of the man inside the dark loft, as me...

What a xxxxxxx joke...

[mike tesko]

Richardson even introduces an element of time, in which to incorporate a fictional dialogue between the muppet and the man, as though the man in the loft waited around for the muppet to make his speech...

[mike tesko]

I wonder what drugs, these muppets, Richardson and Higham were taking that night...

How the xxxx could DS Higham have jumped up and knocked the loft cover out of the way, which caused it to fall to the floor? A giant was he...

Then fat boy Richardson, takes a leap of faith and tries to knock a board or a metal fireplace out of the way - are these muppets for real?