The Case Of Mike Tesko

[mike tesko]

What a complete load of xxxx xxxx - a man banging his own head very hard against the window block of his cell, or the wall of the cell, at a rate of 70 blows per minute, for 9 minutes '630 blows', and some, if we also take into account the other 5 minutes of alleged similar activity...

.

[mike tesko]

PC Wilde, testified during my trial that he observed me banging my head against the cell window block, at a rate of 80 blows per minute, or so...

Lying no good xxxxxx..

How could PC Wylde, and PC Howe, both see through the same peephole as one another, at one and the same time?

They beat me, they set the police dog on me, and they left me handcuffed in a cell for two solid days...

I was badly injured and these xxxx xxx monsters didn't give a xxx xxx xxx..

[mike tesko]

PC Wilde, testified during my trial that he observed me banging my head against the cell window block, at a rate of 80 blows per minute, or so...

Lying no good xxxxxx.

How could PC Wylde, and PC Howe, both see through the same peephole as one another, at one and the same time?

They beat me, they set the police dog on me, and they left me handcuffed in a cell for two solid days...

I was badly injured and these xxxx xxx monsters didn't give a xxx xxx xxx....

Neither did the dodgy magistrates, or the bias trial judge...

Only people who showed any interest, were the prison authorities in reception, who were concerned that they might get the blame for doing to me, what the evil South Yorkshire Cops did to me...

[mike tesko]

In the mid 80's, if the cops weren't verballing you up, or beating you up, or fabricating evidence, then you truly must have been innocent - thatcher and her mob didn't give a xxx xxx xxx how cops were treating suspects, or as the case may be, target criminals...

[mike tesko]

In the mid 80's, if the cops weren't verballing you up, or beating you up, or fabricating evidence, then you truly must have been innocent - thatcher and her mob didn't give a xxxx xxx xxx how cops were treating suspects, or as the case may be, target criminals...

thatcher was a xxxx she was in on the Hillsboro' cover up, somebody ought to have given her a good hiding, the horrible xxxx ...

[mike tesko]

Lets keep promoting evil lying cops, lets give them all a fukking big pay rise...

[mike tesko]

thank fuk that evil thatcher twat, is dead...

My family and my relatives and friends didn't half suffer at her hands during the miners strike...

She was pure fukking evil...

Cops ought to have kicked her head in, instead of mine...

[mike tesko]

The Government is now picking on the disabled - I say, chop the prime minister's legs off, and lets see how he feels about it. He's another monster, following on from that xxxx thacther...

[mike tesko]

After two days of being in handcuffs in a locked cell in the custody suite at Barnsley police station, my sister who was concerned about my welfare contacted our family doctor, Dr Cautley, who arranged to come to the police station to examine me. He took the three photographs I have displayed in this thread. He concluded that the main injury to the front top part of my head was caused by the strike of a police truncheon. He demanded that police took me immediately to hospital to be examined there, and treated...

So much for me supposedly smashing my own head against the cell window block for over 630 times, or more...

[mike tesko]

This is the case where two bent coppers from Barnsley, who were part of a No.3 regional crime squad campaign, claimed they were inside an observation van when they invented an identification of me, but the van they both claimed to have been inside at 5.20pm, on the 22nd January, 1986, was still parked up in the police compound at Barnsley, and was not sent for until 5.30pm, and not actually parked up in the street until 5.55pm. One of the bent coppers (DC Caulfield) who fabricated that evidence which served to keep me on remand for five and a half months, never got charged with perjury or perverting the course of justice, or anything and he later went on to become an inspector at Barnsley...

Corruption in South Yorkshire police goes deep..

Here they are, dodgy DC Caulfield, as he was then, and his dishonest sidekick, DS Shepherd, both making a false witness statement, both making a witness statement on the exact same date (17th March, 1986) regarding them both being inside a static police observation van a 5.20pm, on the 22nd January, 1986 at a location known as Monkspring taking part in a No.3 Regional Crime Squad operation.

[mike tesko]

Here is the typed version of the No.3 Regional Crime Squad survelance for that (22nd January, 1986) date. note that DC Caulfield (part of call sign 28) was sent to collect the police observation van which was parked up back at Barnsley police station compound at 5.30pm, that same date, so neither he nor DS Shepherd could possibly have been inside it parked in the street 10 minutes sooner. In fact, the van in question did not get parked up in the street according to the contents f the observation log, until 5.55pm -  35 minutes, afterwards...

DC Caulfield was not even partnering DS Shepherd at 5.20pm, on that surveillance, since DC Caulfield under call sign 28 was partnering DI Henshaw, and a DS McCaw. DS Roy Shepherd, his call sign was 34, and he was partnering a DS Smith, at that time...

5.20pm - message from call sign 28 - there's a red Alfa romeo ERR 934 V parked direct in front of the house of Darnley.

5.23am - call sign 28 - the Alfa romeo has just driven out of 4 Monkspring into Allendale Road,  its  heading towards you 30.

5.25pm - call sign 26 - that vehicle was stolen last night in the Hammerton Road area of Sheffield.

5.25pm - call sign 28 - here are two males in the vehicle, I cannot gave a description. We won't catch him now. We will stay on the original plot.

5.30pm - call sign 28 - DC Caulfield to Barnsley D.H.Q with DS Crook to collect the observation van. On arrival to plot pick up DS Shepherd from 34 and leave the van in Monk spring.

5.55pm - obs van - in position.

[mike tesko]

Cops lie and fabricate evidence all the time. In South Yorkshire police officers were not even making their own witness statements for Christ sake, but instead witness statements were being made for them by other officers, or as DS Roy Shepherd puts it, made by the so called ' officer n the case'...

Is it any wonder, that cover ups, like the one at Hillsboro' happened at all...

Here is DS Roy Shepherds committal deposition:-

Let's analyze what DS Roy Shepherd said in his deposition from the commttal proceedings in question...

(1) he doesn't even know how his statement was made up, he stated it could have been made, one or two different ways. This makes a mockery of the caution at the beginning of each C.J.A. witness statement, which states that the named witness makes the foregoing witness statement of their own free will, and that they shall be liable to prosecution if...

What a joke...

(2) he states that when his witness statement, dated, 17th March, 1986, was made up for him, that times were not included, but obtained later, and put in by use of a different typewriter. No information about 'when' exactly these times were inserted, or who by...

What a farce...

(3) he stated that at 5.20pm, on the 22nd January, 1986, that he would have been in the observation van, but he couldn't have been, because he was with DS Smith in a police car which had the call sign 34. The observation van was not put into position in the street close to the target premises, until 5.55pm...

Such blatant lies...

(4) he does not have a description of the man known as me in his pocketbook, he says in one breath, because he said he knew me, whereas elsewhere he states that he did not know what I looked like, and that he was not aware that the crime squad did not know that he had never see me, or met me before. He then gives a somewhat convoluted explanation about the two men he claims to have seen, being identical in appearance, but that the man he claims was me, was 4" taller than the other man.

God strewth...

(5) alleged incident happened on the 22nd January, 1986. I was arrested from home during the early hours of 30th January, 1986, taken to Barnsley, interviewed, charged and put on remand, where I remained until 7th July 1986. However, DS Shepherd and his dodgy sidekick DC Caulfield did not mention to me until the 11th March, 1986, that they were saying that I was one of the two men they had seen on the 22nd January, 1986...

Talk about jackanory...

[mike tesko]

Now, let's consider the contents of DC Caulfields committal deposition:-

(1) he is another officer who got information contained in his witness statement from 'other officers'...

(2) he also says the only difference between the two men he saw on the 22nd January, was in the height of one of the men...

(3) there is a descrepancy in the height of the man he  says he was told was me, six feet, whereas, the first man he said he saw on the 22nd January, 1986, he described as being six feet two inches, possibly, six feet three inches...

(4) he agreed that the observation van was not in position, until 5.55pm, on 22nd January, 1986...

(5) no record made in his pocketbook relating to description of first man, or that he had identified me as one of the two men...

(6) first time he made any reference to identification and offences relating to 22nd January, 1986, was on the 11th March 1986...

This coincided with the instigation of 'operation swag' matters, that unfolded on the 19th March, 1986. The introduction of the alleged identification evidence to 22nd January, 1986, becoming a focal point for that episode. Shepherd and Caulfield introduced this dodgy identification claim with a view to framing me in a conspiracy with a person, or persons, unknown, to commit over 500 burglaries throughout the north of England - all of it a pack of lies...

[mike tesko]

The Cop in charge of the surveillance, claimed that he saw a man at the front door of No.4 Monkspring, from the vantage point of the front passenger seat that he was sat in, as the vehicle turned into Monkspring, from Allendale, who he positively identified as being me (when it wasn't me). He claimed this occurred on the 29th January, 1986.  Here is DI Henshaws witness statement. Well, I say its his statement, but you don't know from one cop to another, who made who's witness statements, its bloody crazy...

(1) As can be seen, by reference to the timing when the alleged surveillance commenced, (5.20pm) on the 22nd January, 1986, the time has been 'inserted', with use of a different type faced typewriter, in the exact same manner, that was employed in the named witness statements of DC Caulfield, and DS Shepherd. A gap was left in the statement, and the time (5.20pm) was 'added', at a later time, without any mention of when or where, or by who, it was added. It is not even known despite over 30 years having elready elapsed, whether it was the same person who added the time (5.20pm) in all three examples of witness statements.

(2) Note, how the timings of the second surveillance which allegedly took place on the 29th January, 1986, did not have the timings (4.30pm and 9.15pm ) typed with the same different type faced typewriter, drawing attention to the dodgy surveillance of the previous week, when lo and behold, dodgy Caulfield, and dodgy Shepherd, sought to introduce the false claim of identification of a man involved in this incident, identifications which they did not seek to introduce until the 11th March, 1986...

(3) Note, that this version of DI Henshaws witness statement, dated, 18th March, 1986, is counter signed by DC Caulfield, he also having counter signed, DS Shepherds, witness statement, dated, 17th March, 1986...

(4) He claimed that he saw a man that was me coming out of the front door of some target premises, on the 29th January, 1986 (but it wasn't me who he saw). Rather more bizarrely, he claimed that the man he said was me, exited the front door of No.4 Monk spring, that he walked across the front of the house, then disappeared around the corner, down the side of the house, and into a door situated on that side of the house, that as he approached this door, that Henshaw heard it slam shut, heard the key in the door lock being turned, and bolts being put on the door inside.

(5) What happened to the man he said was me, who had gone into the premises, through the door that was slammed shut, I must have simply vanished into thin air, because there is no mention by anybody that I was found, or seen inside that house on that occasion..


(6) Here is the head of the surveillance, saying that all other members of the No.3 Regional Crime Squad, were aware of what Foggin, and Teskowski, looked like, other than DC Caulfield, and DS Shepherd - how odd then, to put Caulfield and Shepherd in the observation van that was never in position in the street outside the target premises, at 5.20pm, on the 22nd January, 1986, with both Caulfield and Shepherd claiming they were inside it, and that on that same date, they identified me, as one of the two men they had seen, yet the lying bastards didn't seek to introduce that fabricated identification evidence, until the 11th March, 1986...

[mike tesko]

Let's now look at DI Henshaws committal deposition,  taken at Barnsley Magistrates court:-

(1) Henshaw asserts that he was responsible for making the log, dated, 22nd January, 1986 - inside which both DC Caulfield, and DS Shepherd claimed they had both been present in, from 5.20pm, onward...

(2) Henshaw, agreed that his signature appears on the aforementioned surveillance log...

(3) DI Henshaw states, that his witness statement, dated, 18th March, 1986, was typed by reference to the notes recorded in his pocketbook...

(4) he agreed the the time (5.20pm) typed on the first page had been inserted with use of a different type faced typewriter (same thing happened, in the witness statements of DC Caulfield, and DS Shepherd, who's witness statements were both, dated, 17th March, 1986), when asked why the time (5.20pm) had been inserted into the body of an already existing witness statement page, with use of a completely different type writer which had a different typeface, he replied, that he 'could not answer that'. What became apparent from his answer and the testimony he had given, thus far, was that on the 18th March, 1986, when his witness statement had been typed by reference to his pocket book entry, as per the 22nd January, 1986, that there was no times entered into his pocketbook at all, otherwise, the body of the statement, including the time (5.20pm) would have been typed with use of the same typewriter, not two different ones (this argument also applied to DC Caulfield, and DS Shepherd, who's witness statements were, dated, 17th March, 1986...

(5) it becomes apparent that Henshaw could not have signed his witness statement, dated, 18th March, 1986, on that date itself, because he stated that the witness statement was made up from the notes in his pocketbook. If the witness statement had been made up from the notes in his pocketbook, on the 18th March, 1986, as per the alleged events of 22nd September, 1986, the time (5.20pm) would have been typed by use of the same type writer as the remaining body of his witness statement. The fact that it wasn't has to be treated as confirmation that Henshaw did not have any timings recorded in his pocketbook, on the 18th March, 1986, as per the alleged events of 22nd January, 1986...

(6) According to DI Henshaw, at a debriefing held immedistely after the alleged events on the 22nd January, 1986, it was brought to his attention that DC Caulfield, and DS Shepherd did not know me. So, here at this state, the head of the surveillance is admitting that after a debrief, held on the 22nd January, 1986, the two officers who introduced this police identification evidence (11th March, 1986) to link me to these earlier matters (22nd January, 1986)had not identified me as one of the two men they claim they had seen on that earlier occasion, otherwise, the police would have hot footed it to my then home address to arrest me, a week before they actually arrested me (30th January, 1986)...

(7) Henshaw stated, that he was prepared to let other people come and go to the target premises, because his main concern was to arrest Foggin, and Teskowski - this tactic permitted the criminals who were really responsible for all the crimes they charged me with, to escape and not face prosecution, just so the cops could pin the blame on me for everything they wanted to clear up...

(8) After the 'strike now', command was given, Henshaw and the others, arrived outside the target premises at more or less the same time, and no sooner does Henshaw arrive there, than he claims falsely that he saw me leaving the front door of No.4 Monkspring (whoever he saw, he did not see me there, the lying bastard) - as will be seen, Henshaws view of the front door of those premises was blocked off completely because of the existence of a six feet tall privet hedge, raised on top of an 18 inch boundary wall of the garden of No.4, Monkspring (the animal would not have been able to see the house door, let alone identify anyone coming out of that door)...

(9) In addition to this impossibility, Henshaw was the driver of the surveillance vehicle, and would have needed to look beyond his front seat passenger to stand any chance of getting a view, of either the front door of No.4, on the nearside of the vehicle he was travelling in, or the man he claimed was me, when it wasn't...

(10) Henshaws remarks regarding a vehicle they allegedly followed later on in the evening, which was travelling, he claimed at speeds of between 80 and 90 MPH on roads which had a restricted speed limit of only 30 MPH, is testimony to the license this particular group of criminalized bent coppers had. Just for the record, police never charged me with any speeding offences, or any motoring offences, it was just pure bullshit on their part...

(11) Henshaw claimed that he only had me in his sight for a few seconds at the most (it wasn't me he saw), he claimed he first saw me, through the nearside of the police vehicle that he was driving as it pulled up outside No.4 Monkspring - but it was all a big fabrication, because there was the physical barrier of the 18 inch raised garden wall, on top of which was a thick privet hedge, presenting a seven and a half feet tall barrier preventing him from seeing what he claimed he had seen...

(12) Henshaw claims that he chased after the man he had seen leaving the front door, once he got out of his police vehicle. He was that anxious to get after that man, that he left the keys in the ignition, he said with the engine still running. Worse still, the idiot claimed that although he ran after this man (who he claimed was me, but it wasn't me), he said that by the time he got to the side door of the house, and he heard the door slam shut and whatever, he says he could not see any fresh footprints in the snow, which suggested the man he had seen had gone into the house, in question. Bloody marvellous, these ridiculous things those keystone cops were saying, and writing about me. I never realized that I could walk on fresh snow without leaving any footprints in it...

(13) According to Henshaw, and the other lying clowns that surrounded the house in question within a matter of seconds, I somehow, 'vanished' from the bloody scene, now there's a funny thing, I never realized until now that if I had been that man, then I have got, or I had powers that were not human. I must be 'a super hero', or as the case may be, 'I was a super hero'. My friends and family, dubbed me ' Spring heeled Jack' once I got arrested, convicted, and sentenced, not for these, but many other matters that bent cops successfully pinned on me by a reliance on dodgy identification evidence made by police offiicers (Spring heeled Jack, re-incarnated)...

(14) Henshaw makes mention of police informant Gordon Stanton, from Goldthorpe, in South Yorkshire. What an evil individual 'Gordon Stanton' was (is). He not only was a professional police informant (he helped to convict a gang of armed robbers from Doncaster, whilst working undercover as a gang member, for which he received a £10,000 payment), but he was also a member of a paedophile ring, which the No.3 Regional Crime Squad, turned a blind eye to. That bastard has got a lot to answer for, so has his wife, Debbie Stanton. If I were to tell you. that the No.3 RCS got another professional police informer (Godfrey Lewis) to infiltrate Stantons' gang, whilst Stanton and his wife were also on the payroll of the police, it would not be an exaggeration. The Stantons used to stub lighted cigarettes out on the bodies of their (own) young children who were all under the ages of 5 (the Stantons' and other members of the paedophile ring that they ran were (are) vile individuals)...

15 Henshaw states that at the debrief after the surveillance on the 22nd January, 1986, it became apparent that DC Caulfield, and DS Shepherd could not identify Teskowski (yet by 11th March, 1986, they did do)...