Author Topic: Why wasn't crispy shot?  (Read 40236 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #405 on: October 21, 2017, 12:54:PM »
Adam the source is the hand written notes made by Peter Vanezis the Pathologist at the scene now you know how to look in the Archives so don't try to cop out the words were written by Peter Vanezis not me and you know quite well I am unable to bring this to the forum so pop off and read the report hand written one then if you please the typed one Kaldin found them so I am sure you are quite able to do so.

Why can't you bring it to the forum ? Do you not know how to post sources ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #406 on: October 21, 2017, 12:56:PM »
If there was blood on her hand, then their should be traces f blood on the swabs - it's not that the swabs are false necessarily, but it does raise questions.

I've reread Elliot's statements and court evidence.

There is no mention of testing for blood, only for metals. Whether Sheila's hands were blood stained, or not, doesn't appear to have any impact on the swabs.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #407 on: October 21, 2017, 12:59:PM »
I've reread Elliot's statements and court evidence.

There is no mention of testing for blood, only for metals. Whether Sheila's hands were blood stained, or not, doesn't appear to have any impact on the swabs.

They didn't test for blood? Oh dear.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #408 on: October 21, 2017, 12:59:PM »
Because he/the CT cannot control what is posted here.

Ah right. He can't actually read this forum himself can he?

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #409 on: October 21, 2017, 01:00:PM »
Why can't you bring it to the forum ? Do you not know how to post sources ?

Sixth line from the top.


Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #410 on: October 21, 2017, 01:01:PM »
Ah right. He can't actually read this forum himself can he?

No he can't, but he is sent print offs of posts.

 

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #411 on: October 21, 2017, 01:02:PM »
They didn't test for blood? Oh dear.

I don't know, but there is no evidence or report that they did.

What would have been the point anyway?

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #412 on: October 21, 2017, 01:03:PM »
No he can't, but he is sent print offs of posts.

Does he have a favourite poster?

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #413 on: October 21, 2017, 01:03:PM »
I don't know, but there is no evidence or report that they did.

What would have been the point anyway?

To see if there was any blood which wasn't very visible to the naked eye.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #414 on: October 21, 2017, 01:04:PM »
No he can't, but he is sent print offs of posts.

That must keep him busy!  ;D

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #415 on: October 21, 2017, 01:04:PM »
Does he have a favourite poster?

You, of course. :)) :))

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #416 on: October 21, 2017, 01:04:PM »
Does he have a favourite poster?

If he does, it's probably you Hartley.  :))

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #417 on: October 21, 2017, 01:05:PM »
If he does, it's probably you Hartley.  :))

That seems unlikely.  ;D

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #418 on: October 21, 2017, 01:05:PM »
That must keep him busy!  ;D

He does not see them all - only ones that certain people want him to see.


guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #419 on: October 21, 2017, 01:10:PM »
To see if there was any blood which wasn't very visible to the naked eye.

Well yes, I understand what such a test might identify, however, what I meant was, the absence or presence of blood in this instance wouldn't have had any impact on the investigation, so why would they bother conducting such a test?