Author Topic: Why wasn't crispy shot?  (Read 40202 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #450 on: October 21, 2017, 05:23:PM »
I agree.

Adam, the appeal document is really useful, particularly with regard to certain facts, but the decision of the judges was made on their opinion. Others might have a different opinion.

I will quote the COA when appropriate. It is a primary source as Jan would say.

Such as today when Lookout said 'Wasn't there soot on Sheila's hands ?'

Feel free to post counter sources.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #451 on: October 21, 2017, 06:50:PM »
I will quote the COA when appropriate. It is a primary source as Jan would say.

Such as today when Lookout said 'Wasn't there soot on Sheila's hands ?'

Feel free to post counter sources.






Adam,it's no used being so obsessed with JB being the murderer,you have to cast your net wider and look at the bigger picture instead of being focussed on JB. There are many facets to this case.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #452 on: October 21, 2017, 06:58:PM »





Adam,it's no used being so obsessed with JB being the murderer,you have to cast your net wider and look at the bigger picture instead of being focussed on JB. There are many facets to this case.

It's precisely by casting nets wider that it becomes clear it wuz Jeremy wot dun it.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #453 on: October 21, 2017, 07:00:PM »
It's precisely by casting nets wider that it becomes clear it wuz Jeremy wot dun it.







Not necesscelery.