Where did the allegations in the Mckensie report originate; Jeremy Bamber?

[Stephanie]

In this letter (2011) he attributes Mike and others with his own character traits
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,908.0.html



There's reference to Jeremy's state of mind in these 3 letters

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,107.msg48680.html#msg48680

Wonder if they were written in the same vein as the one above (2011) 

Yes, that Flickr account was no longer necessary because the current site was in the pipeline where I can post it all, and it is under my control - hope this explains the current position. As for the letters mentioned, I shall be reposting them along with the hundreds of others at some point or other. At the time most of these letters were written between Jeremy and me, he was aware that I would be divulging the contents to third parties because of the nature of work I was carrying out on his behalf when there was only a handful of people helping him at a time when he could not get legal aid...

I also kept copies of all the letters I wrote back to Jeremy, which details the third parties I discussed and showed the contents of his letters to, so it is an historical account of events and worthy of publication, in my view - at some point. Of course, some of the things which Jeremy wrote to me about were personal matters which he asked me never to divulge to anyone, and I would respect that, things that should never be made public knowledge...

Then this one from 2013 where he states he "gets a it muddled sometimes" http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8339.msg397376.html#msg397376

[Stephanie]

Then this letter to Trudi in 2016

[Stephanie]

Try reading the letter in the correct context. He states "if it wasn't Sheila" while entertaining the thought of it being AP. Furthermore if Jeremy is being told that Sheila could not have done it while knowing he didn't do it either you cannot blame him for considering a 3rd party.

How to make a list of 31 pieces like Adam.

Step 1: Take 5 pieces of outdated and refuted evidence.

Step 2: Turn those 5 pieces into bullshit by claiming they are undisputed.

Step 3: Turn those 5 pieces of Bullshit into 25 by rewording those 5 pieces of bullshit fives times over.

Step 4: Insert 6 pieces of factual evidence that don't prove anything in order to make the other 25 pieces of bullshit look honest.

Step 5: Make up a source for each piece of bullshit by misquoting or misattributing the infomation to a any particular person.

Step 6: Claim Bamber agrees to everything and anything because Roger Wilkes interviewed him.

Step 7: Never talk about one single piece of evidence at a time because none of them stand up to scrutiny.

Step 8: Once people realise the list of pieces is just a load of garbage simply ignore them and post it all again.

Done.

David, it's not Adam projecting - it's Jeremy Bamber and in turn people like yourself.

But you can't see it because your bias won't allow it.

Are we now really expected to believe that AP was still in the house at 07.34 as Bamber claims?

[lookout]

Aren't guilters biased too  Don't guilters project too 

[Adam]

David, it's not Adam projecting - it's Jeremy Bamber and in turn people like yourself.

But you can't see it because your bias won't allow it.

Are we now really expected to believe that AP was still in the house at 07.34 as Bamber claims?

David's tactic is to focus on me when evidence is posted. Which is against forum rules.

He did previously briefly say the COA was not a valid source. If that's the case then thousands of former & future appeals could be wrong.

Anyway, page 2 on this thread has 23 pieces of evidence from the COA & 8 other sourced pieces of evidence. Showing Sheila did not commit the massacre.

Not sure what else supporters can be given apart from a signed confession from Bamber. Even then supporters will claim RB forged Bamber's signature.

[lookout]

David's tactic is to focus on me when evidence is posted. Which is against forum rules.

He did previously briefly say the COA was not a valid source. If that's the case then millions of former & future appeals could be wrong.

Anyway, page 2 on this thread has 23 pieces of evidence from the COA & 8 other sourced pieces of evidence. Showing Sheila did not commit the massacre.

Not sure what else supporters can be given apart from a signed confession from Bamber. Even then supporters will claim RB forged Bamber's signature.

Supporters don't need your manipulating either. We are our own persons with our own train of thoughts.

[Caroline]

He slipped up: was caught in the lie..

Like he slipped up in 1991 by accusing AP of being the murderer 

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=4209.0 (last page of his letter to Mike)

He slips up frequently.

[lookout]

Everyone else was telling the truth ? Statements,etc 100% perfection,inc EP et al ?

[Caroline]

Everyone else was telling the truth ? Statements,etc 100% perfection,inc EP et al ?

Who knows but Jeremy certainly wasn't

[Stephanie]

Supporters don't need your manipulating either. We are our own persons with our own train of thoughts.

Adam is NOT manipulating you; Jeremy Bamber is!

As Adam has rightly pointed out, youre too busy focused on him, me or whoever Jeremy points you towards at that given moment in time. And indeed what ever evidence is the trend of the week.

[Kaldin]

It seems to me that Adam is very much focused on what people here say - judging by his comments elsewhere.

[Stephanie]

It seems to me that Adam is very much focused on what people here say - judging by his comments elsewhere.

No idea what you're talking about but seems you too are focused on Adam the person as opposed the contents of his posts.

[Kaldin]

No idea what you're talking about but seems you too are focused on Adam the person as opposed the contents of his posts.

Not really, I'm saying that he's too focused on members. He knows what I mean.

[Stephanie]

Not really, I'm saying that he's too focused on members. He knows what I mean.

Not really what?

You have repeated yourself!

Are you suggesting Adam thinks the same way you do?

[Kaldin]

Not really what?

You have repeated yourself!

Are you suggesting Adam thinks the same way you do?

I have no idea if he does.