Author Topic: A New Approach  (Read 55988 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #210 on: August 02, 2017, 08:15:PM »
But I learned it all from you when I first joined, Jackie. Your old posts, coupled with your being banned from two forums, plus the number of posters who warned me about you, backs up what I'm saying.

I guess it cost Simon nothing whatsoever to say nice things about your video. He simply told you what you wanted to hear.


Can you make yourself look even stupider
You have excelled yourself tonight

Now you know what Simon McKay the barrister thinks

I bet everyone is having good laugh at your expense
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #211 on: August 02, 2017, 08:26:PM »

Can you make yourself look even stupider
You have excelled yourself tonight

Now you know what Simon McKay the barrister thinks

I bet everyone is having good laugh at your expense

You're looking in that mirror and talking to yourself again, aren't you? There appears to be NO depths you won't sink to in order to extricate yourself from the responsibilities of your own behaviour. Perhaps you'd care to tell me -and everyone else- why it's I who look foolish for revealing what you are. I'm not in the least bit interested in what you tell me that SM said...............but I would be interested to hear what he believes. Oh, and for future reference, correctly said, it "more stupid" NOT "stupider".
« Last Edit: August 03, 2017, 01:31:PM by Jane J »

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #212 on: September 24, 2017, 10:16:AM »
Kaldin there is a lots on the thread about Julie Mugford offering to identify the bodies Of The 3 adults and two babies although she wasn't a close relative and there were numerous other people who could have done this

Teachers, social workers, foster parents

A defining moment in the case

We are led to believe she is an intelligent human being???
Can anyone really believe she would do this if they knew the person she was sleeping with was responsible

As we know Julie was a prolific liar and if this points strongly to the fact Julie lied about what she knew and witnessed what else is left in this case to point at Jeremy
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #213 on: September 24, 2017, 10:56:AM »
Kaldin there is a lots on the thread about Julie Mugford offering to identify the bodies Of The 3 adults and two babies although she wasn't a close relative and there were numerous other people who could have done this

Teachers, social workers, foster parents

A defining moment in the case

We are led to believe she is an intelligent human being???
Can anyone really believe she would do this if they knew the person she was sleeping with was responsible

As we know Julie was a prolific liar and if this points strongly to the fact Julie lied about what she knew and witnessed what else is left in this case to point at Jeremy

You've been told why Julie identified the bodies, they wouldn't ask teachers and social workers FFS!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #214 on: September 24, 2017, 01:33:PM »
You've been told why Julie identified the bodies, they wouldn't ask teachers and social workers FFS!

Told by you, another one of your 'stories'

There were numerous other people who could identify the bodies other that Jeremy's bit on side who was in for months and went along with the 'planned murders'

It's a fact and you have not posted a single piece of evidence to prove otherwise
Not one
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #215 on: September 24, 2017, 01:43:PM »
Told by you, another one of your 'stories'

There were numerous other people who could identify the bodies other that Jeremy's bit on side who was in for months and went along with the 'planned murders'

It's a fact and you have not posted a single piece of evidence to prove otherwise
Not one

surely one of the relatives could of inditified the bodys dident any of them know what the twins looked like,

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #216 on: September 24, 2017, 01:46:PM »
Told by you, another one of your 'stories'

There were numerous other people who could identify the bodies other that Jeremy's bit on side who was in for months and went along with the 'planned murders'

It's a fact and you have not posted a single piece of evidence to prove otherwise
Not one

Why would EP go to the trouble of contacting and picking up teachers and social workers from London, driving them to Essex when Julie Mugford was there at the scene, (she could tell them apart and was willing to do so)?

Grow up Jackie!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44317
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #217 on: September 24, 2017, 01:49:PM »
Foster parents ?

'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #218 on: September 24, 2017, 02:23:PM »
Why would EP go to the trouble of contacting and picking up teachers and social workers from London, driving them to Essex when Julie Mugford was there at the scene, (she could tell them apart and was willing to do so)?

Grow up Jackie!

No you grow up and get real

If 'was' involved in the murder plan she would never had offered to view the bodies
Are you suggesting she went straight from shagging Jeremy just down the road to the mortuary?
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #219 on: September 24, 2017, 02:24:PM »
Why would EP go to the trouble of contacting and picking up teachers and social workers from London, driving them to Essex when Julie Mugford was there at the scene, (she could tell them apart and was willing to do so)?

Grow up Jackie!

Right so how far in miles were the foster parents (you obviously know)
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #220 on: September 24, 2017, 02:26:PM »
Why would EP go to the trouble of contacting and picking up teachers and social workers from London, driving them to Essex when Julie Mugford was there at the scene, (she could tell them apart and was willing to do so)?

Grow up Jackie!


Another ridiculous post, are you suggesting that Mugford knew the twins better than the foster parents and social workers
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #221 on: September 24, 2017, 02:49:PM »
Right so how far in miles were the foster parents (you obviously know)

How far in meters was Julie Mugford? Your suggestion as per usual, is ludicrous.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #222 on: September 24, 2017, 02:56:PM »

Another ridiculous post, are you suggesting that Mugford knew the twins better than the foster parents and social workers

why dident Jeremy or the relatives do it.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #223 on: September 24, 2017, 03:01:PM »
why dident Jeremy or the relatives do it.

The relatives couldn't tell the twins apart - don't know why Jeremy didn't. Someone would have to ask him.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: A New Approach
« Reply #224 on: September 24, 2017, 03:04:PM »
The relatives couldn't tell the twins apart - don't know why Jeremy didn't. Someone would have to ask him.


You obviously know that ????? Or another guess

No the relatives didn't  bother much with the Bamber family until they saw money up for grabs
« Last Edit: September 24, 2017, 03:08:PM by JackieD »
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000