A New Approach

[JackieD]

I'm waiting for you to reveal it to the forum.

I have revealed everything on the forum and I will not be posting anymore and most of the communications regarding the documentary are private including the backlash but I would have copied Ngb as I alway do because I respect his opinion

I have no obligation to reveal anything to you so you will just have to deal with that

[JackieD]

Jackie
Just my opinion but I would have thought that if Jeremy was not convicted Julie would have got nothing Jeremy would have got the big handout not her

I know Susan, luckily I have never experienced meeting someone as wicked as Mugford before

[Adam]

There you go minimizing Julie's behaviour to prove your point.  Whichever way you look at it and whatever JB may or may not have done I would bet Julie was no shrinking violet.  She was probably quite a tough cookie who for some reason didn't seem to be able to make good choices.

Well she smoked & dealt Cannabis although I have not seen a source. Committed minor cheque book fraud as a teenager & acted as look out when Bamber robbed the caravan site.

Only the minor cheque book fraud & caravan break in relate to the massacre. Both would have deterred Julie from approaching the police. Bamber trusting Julie enough to assist him with the caravan break in shows he trusted her enough to involve her in his criminal activities.

[buddy]

You still insist on calling it 'minor' cheque fraud.  They reported the cheque book stolen and then blatantly used it to buy goods in Oxford Street. That takes some nerve imo.  Speaks volumes to me..... the young JM wanted possessions and was prepared to steal for them.  She was tough enough to carry through such a scam.  She didn't appear to have moral boundaries, she was 21, not 12 and was training to be a teacher.
It's sometimes suggested JB put her up to it and ineffective little Julie couldn't say no to him.  That's a poor argument as she was in life and in the eyes of the law a grown up and quite capable of making her own decisions.

I quite agree Maggie she was no shrinking violet Adam would have us think that JM was taken in but she said she knew from day one that JB was guilty but said nothing even after viewing the bodies.
She was probably smoking cannabis long before  she met Jeremy imo.
I wonder if she is as liberal with drug taking now she is a headmistress?

[Jane]

I'm still waiting for proof Jeremy helped himself to potatoes without Nevilles consent

Who said he did? You're the one who's planting the thought.

[Adam]

I quite agree Maggie she was no shrinking violet Adam would have us think that JM was taken in but she said she knew from day one that JB was guilty but said nothing even after viewing the bodies.
She was probably smoking cannabis long before  she met Jeremy imo.
I wonder if she is as liberal with drug taking now she is a headmistress?

Julie betrayed Bamber after 20 days. She didn't have much chance before that as Bamber was whisking her to Eastbourne, Pevensey, London & Amsterdam.

Maybe she was smoking cannabis before meeting Bamber. So what ?

[susan]

It was Bamber's choice to rob his family & stage the scene.

He said he would be the number one suspect but no one will be able to prove it. He also said he did it to highlight poor security. However then contradicted himself by saying he shouldn't have spent all the money.

Julie was just dragged along in the middle of the night to act as look out.

Adam source please for all the points you raised you speak as if you were Julie and that is how you know exactly what Jeremy said I find this so creepy.

[Adam]

Can someone provide a source that Julie smoked & dealt in cannabis. I have only read it on here from supporters ?  Not that it has anything to do with the massacre.

Bamber including Julie in his drug buying trip to Amsterdam again shows Bamber was prepared to involve Julie in his criminal activities. This explains Bamber's 3 phone calls in 7 hours either side of the massacre.

[Adam]

Adam source please for all the points you raised you speak as if you were Julie and that is how you know exactly what Jeremy said I find this so creepy.

You are always asking people for sources, but never provide any yourself. Which is creepy.

The source is Bamber's court testimony.

[Jane]

I know Susan, luckily I have never experienced meeting someone as wicked as Mugford before

Surely you look in a mirror?

[susan]

Julie betrayed Bamber after 20 days. She didn't have much chance before that as Bamber was whisking her to Eastbourne, Pevensey, London & Amsterdam.

Maybe she was smoking cannabis before meeting Bamber. So what ?

Adam what you are saying is Julie was enjoying herself so much tripping off with Jeremy she put the dreadful murders he had committed to the back of her mind then he dumped her and she remembered then. Oh dear

[Jane]

Thank you Maggie it was obviously to Jane

It was YOU!!!!!!!!!

[maggie]

Can someone provide a source that Julie smoked & dealt in cannabis. I have only read it on here from supporters ?  Not that it has anything to do with the massacre.

Bamber including Julie in his drug buying trip to Amsterdam again shows Bamber was prepared to involve Julie in his criminal activities. This explains Bamber's 3 phone calls in 7 hours either side of the massacre.

It explains nothing....  try harder Adam. 

[Adam]

Adam what you are saying is Julie was enjoying herself so much tripping off with Jeremy she put the dreadful murders he had committed to the back of her mind then he dumped her and she remembered then. Oh dear

Julie betrayed Bamber after 20 days. Telling 5 people what she knew.

She was still with Bamber.

[maggie]

I quite agree Maggie she was no shrinking violet Adam would have us think that JM was taken in but she said she knew from day one that JB was guilty but said nothing even after viewing the bodies.
She was probably smoking cannabis long before  she met Jeremy imo.
I wonder if she is as liberal with drug taking now she is a headmistress?

Hello buddy, bet there aren't many Headteachers who have a past quite like hers.