Author Topic: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?  (Read 240602 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.


Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #241 on: November 24, 2015, 08:02:PM »
What guff..

Don't fancy a read then Steve? Must admit, I think he might be jumping on the bandwagon a bit and squeezing the last juice of what is vast becoming a raisin  ;D ;D ;D ;D 
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #242 on: November 24, 2015, 08:14:PM »
Don't fancy a read then Steve? Must admit, I think he might be jumping on the bandwagon a bit and squeezing the last juice of what is vast becoming a raisin  ;D ;D ;D ;D

My thoughts too, Caroline. He seems to want a second bite of the apple. Bringing out a second book, when his first one is not even ten years old...  I guess with all the publicity he saw a chance to cash in too, unless he has found out something no one else has, but I no longer believe in things like that with this case.

I may give it a read, but I won't rush to read it or hold out much hope.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #243 on: November 24, 2015, 10:19:PM »
 I'll be buying it as I'd rather read fact than fiction.

John

  • Guest
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #244 on: November 24, 2015, 11:03:PM »
What guff..

Absolutely, he must need the money, what a chump!

The evidence which supports Bambers guilt and Sheila Caffell's innocence does not need to be dissected under a microscope, it is there for all to see, assuming they want to see that is!



My thoughts too, Caroline. He seems to want a second bite of the apple. Bringing out a second book, when his first one is not even ten years old...  I guess with all the publicity he saw a chance to cash in too, unless he has found out something no one else has, but I no longer believe in things like that with this case.

Totally agree Mat, it is always about the money.
« Last Edit: November 24, 2015, 11:06:PM by John »

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #245 on: November 24, 2015, 11:21:PM »
http://www.sclomax.co.uk/forthcoming.html

Was published 'AN' 2008............?

Maybe a new proof reader is in order.

(sorry, couldn't resist  :-[ )


Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #246 on: November 24, 2015, 11:22:PM »
I'll be buying it as I'd rather read fact than fiction.

The facts speak otherwise!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #247 on: November 25, 2015, 03:35:PM »
The FACTS are that Scenes of Crime Officers staged Sheila Caffells death scene, then photographed it, and claimed during the trial that these crime scene photographs (25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and 32) had been taken before anything at the scene had been touched, or moved, proving this was exactly how police  found the rifle on her body, yet crime scene photograph, No. 23, which shows the anshuzt rifle resting against the bedroom window, was taken before all the other photographs which show the same rifle then on her body...

(1) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmCART1vcCo
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20877
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #248 on: November 27, 2015, 09:47:PM »
So many people have said to me, "It's unbelievable that you are so calm, you have been so strong since it all happened." All I can say is that whatever it was that gave me strength at the beginning seems to have deserted me now. I continue to show this optimistic side in public, and when I'm with my friends, I am, in fact, genuinely happy. Once alone, however, I can't cope; I get listless, morose, and just want to fall apart. This is a side I don't wish my friends to see, they have done enough for me already, and it only serves to bring back their own pain.

Through my loneliness I am desperately searching for something new in my life, people who will lift me from this darkness. Life, however, is cruel, because when I try too hard to fulfill those dreams the attempts always seem fruitless. On the other hand, if the answer is staring me in the face, it is either invisible or untouchable. I often think how nice it would be to meet people who don't connect me with the shootings, just so that I can be relaxed and normal; to keep it a secret for a while at least and get to know them without that tragedy hanging over my head; to bring my conversation out of the frame of its recent existence and make me become aware of other things. In a way, I have come to rely on it to hold me up, socially. I feel almost vulnerable without it. What an awful thing to have as a social crutch. I can hide behind it all too easily.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20877

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #250 on: November 27, 2015, 09:55:PM »
Who cut off the call between Neville and Jeremy ?

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13729
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #251 on: November 27, 2015, 10:03:PM »
Who cut off the call between Neville and Jeremy ?


Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20877
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #252 on: November 27, 2015, 10:18:PM »
Who cut off the call between Neville and Jeremy ?
We only have Jeremy's word for the telephone call. The video in #249 shows no blood on the phone. Didn't Scott Lomax tell us Sheila put one finger on the cradle cutting off the phone whilst wielding the rifle in the other? I also notice he trotted out Jeremy's assertion to Police that she had recently indulged in target practice.
« Last Edit: November 27, 2015, 10:19:PM by Steve_uk »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #253 on: November 27, 2015, 10:26:PM »
We only have Jeremy's word for the telephone call. The video in #249 shows no blood on the phone. Didn't Scott Lomax tell us Sheila put one finger on the cradle cutting off the phone whilst wielding the rifle in the other? I also notice he trotted out Jeremy's assertion to Police that she had recently indulged in target practice.






Yes,you're right about what Scott Lomax wrote.I was in anticipation of the swift answer which David presented " there was no phonecall ". How can one be emphatic either way when we don't know ?

As for the target practice-----------Jeremy had said he'd never seen Sheila fire a gun ?

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20877
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #254 on: November 27, 2015, 10:36:PM »





Yes,you're right about what Scott Lomax wrote.I was in anticipation of the swift answer which David presented " there was no phonecall ". How can one be emphatic either way when we don't know ?

As for the target practice-----------Jeremy had said he'd never seen Sheila fire a gun ?
"It must be accepted that Sheila was competent with firearms and was capable of carrying out the murders."

It's remarks like this that make me sceptical of Scott Lomax and as others have said whether this is just another of his many cases through which to make money. http://www.libertarian.co.uk/lapubs/legan/legan042.pdf