Author Topic: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?  (Read 240605 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13729
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #255 on: November 27, 2015, 11:39:PM »
"It must be accepted that Sheila was competent with firearms and was capable of carrying out the murders."

It's remarks like this that make me sceptical of Scott Lomax and as others have said whether this is just another of his many cases through which to make money. http://www.libertarian.co.uk/lapubs/legan/legan042.pdf

There is not allot of money in true crime. If he is after money he is in the wrong business,

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 20877

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13729
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #257 on: November 28, 2015, 12:14:AM »
I see that Jeremy has a new supporter in the form of Dr. Jamie Millard from Berwick. https://www.change.org/p/3878668/c/280141716?recruiter=21622574&utm_source=comment_share&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=share_twitter_responsive&rp_sharecordion_checklist=control

Wow Murdoch involved aswell? Think Dr Millard needs to do his homework.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #258 on: November 28, 2015, 12:16:AM »
I see that Jeremy has a new supporter in the form of Dr. Jamie Millard from Berwick. https://www.change.org/p/3878668/c/280141716?recruiter=21622574&utm_source=comment_share&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=share_twitter_responsive&rp_sharecordion_checklist=control

Someone anti-establishment with this telling comment " I've worked on some of the most horrific cases imaginable & even if I got a confession I never took it as the truth unless all the evidence fitted beyond reasonable doubt"
Few people have the imagination for reality


guest154

  • Guest

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #261 on: November 28, 2015, 01:43:AM »
Alias believes that even if he is guilty he should be out by now.

Glad you remember me, and it is true, I think Jeremy should be out now, no matter what, whether he killed his family or not.

If Jeremy is guitly, who might he kill now? His bio parents? Nah.


The years he served are enough to pay for the crime (which I think he did not do - impossible, in my eyes)

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #262 on: November 28, 2015, 02:10:AM »
Want to add that in all cases where children kill their parents (and in this case either Sheila or Jeremy killed their parents -no matter what, it was parenticide) - there is serious neglect!

That is a tabu here. It is hard to talk about what went wrong between child and parent, Adopted children. I know some have tried, but were always shot down.

We are to believe the Bambers were a perfect family - except one of their children shot them dead and we aren“t allowed to talk about the dysfunction that must have been there.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13729
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #263 on: November 28, 2015, 02:30:AM »

The years he served are enough to pay for the crime (which I think he did not do - impossible, in my eyes)

10 years for killing five members of your own family? I sure am glad you don't make the laws  ::)

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #264 on: November 28, 2015, 02:39:AM »
10 years for killing five members of your own family? I sure am glad you don't make the laws  ::)


All parenticides I have heard of have been a result of neglect - or abuse.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13729
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #265 on: November 28, 2015, 02:44:AM »
If Jeremy is guitly, who might he kill now? His bio parents? Nah.


If Jeremy is guilty I can assure you he has a Kill list already drawn up for if he gets out.

1. David Boulflour
2. Julie Mugford
3. Ann Eaton
4. Anthony Arlidge QC
5. The ten jury members
6. The Lab Scientists


Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13729
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #266 on: November 28, 2015, 02:46:AM »


All parenticides I have heard of have been a result of neglect - or abuse.


guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #267 on: November 28, 2015, 07:58:AM »
Glad you remember me, and it is true, I think Jeremy should be out now, no matter what, whether he killed his family or not.

If Jeremy is guitly, who might he kill now? His bio parents? Nah.


The years he served are enough to pay for the crime (which I think he did not do - impossible, in my eyes)
Lets free the Ripper as well, I don't think he has it in him to kill anyone else?  What a stupid thing to say, let's free them on who might they kill, not what they have done.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33764
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #268 on: November 28, 2015, 08:55:AM »
Lets free the Ripper as well, I don't think he has it in him to kill anyone else?  What a stupid thing to say, let's free them on who might they kill, not what they have done.


Justice HI. Good to see you posting again........................perhaps we should put "dear" Rose West on the list. I'm certain she won't be a danger to anyone........................until she needs to cover up some perverted sex act.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?
« Reply #269 on: November 28, 2015, 11:27:AM »
Glad you remember me, and it is true, I think Jeremy should be out now, no matter what, whether he killed his family or not.

If Jeremy is guitly, who might he kill now? His bio parents? Nah.


The years he served are enough to pay for the crime (which I think he did not do - impossible, in my eyes)

Is the time he has served enough to pay for two lives that didn't get started? The twins would have been about 36 years old now - most likely with a family of their own. Robbed of 60 years between them and you think he's served enough time? Which other child killers should we release in your opinion? Thanks god it's not up to you!
Few people have the imagination for reality