And, the ballistic expert in the instant case, Malcolm Fletcher, has gone on record as saying that he has been unable to find any ballistics evidence to confirm that any of the recovered bullet cases from the scene, have been fired through a silencer attached to the barrel of the anshuzt rifle.
That is because there is no such thing as ballistic evidence that confirms whether or not a baffle moderator was used. It leaves no marks so it can neither be confirmed nor ruled out based on examination of the bullets.
There is no way to tell by looking at the casings either Mallinson is full of crap which is why his claims never went anywhere. You can't cite a single book, or even journal article about examination of casings being able to reveal whether a moderator was used because there are none. It is junk science. Making up that people agree accomplishes nothing but that never stops you from making up things you lie like a rug.
The 25 cases which ended up becoming the batch of crime scene ammunition, does not prove that each of these 25 cases had been fired during the tragedy, any of these 25 cases could have been, and were fired, and ejected via the mechanism of the anshuzt rifle at one stage or point, not necessarily at the time the victims were all killed, murdered, or a suicide..
The police say these were the 25 collected from the murder scene and you have nothing at all to refute it.
You miss the point in your shallow approach, Mallinson believed that Fletcher must have applied the same principles outlined by Mallinson in his theory, and that Fletchers examination of the 25 spent cases showed no sign of bulging or distortion which would almost certainly have accompanied the use of the silencer with the rifle at the time Sheila was killed, or had died.
If Mallinson claimed that then he is an even bigger fool than he already seems for making up the nonsense about the casings bulging more when a moderator is used. First of all he made the whole thing up so suggesting Fletcher would be aware and use this methodology is absurd. Worse yet though, if Fletcher did believe in such horse shit and did apply such horse shit and did find no bulging then he would have said that there was evidence the moderator wasn't used. That is what you are claiming he found. His testimony wasn't that the moderator wasn't used. It was that there was no way to tell whether it was used or not by looking at the ammunition and spent shells. He said that other evidence like the blood in the moderator had to be used to establish it's use. So either you lied and made up that Mallinson suggested this or he is an even more ignorant clown than he seems.
You are pathetic, I don't need to fake anything, all you can say is I lied, I lie, I falsify things, Etc, Etc, ETc, you are a worthless piece of peacock vomit, instead of responding by way of some sort of constructive manner, you resort to accusations, instead of evidence which contradicts that which I am saying. You are a clown, an Amercian Clown, nothing more, nothing less, you are full of bullshit...
You do indeed lie all the time and post disproved nonsense all the time that is why you can never back up anything you say with evidence. Anytime I point out you are lying or parroting lies/erroneous claims you swiped from others you are never able to produce evidence to prove me wrong. You just repeat the same nonsense claims over again.
I have never suggested that this may have been the actual sequence of events, so please explain to everybody why you continue to attribute your thoughts, your sayings and ideas, as if what you say, what you said, are my words, you foolish American buffoon...
No one cares what you say, the evidence says that she was in bed for at least 4 of the 7 shots. 2 more shots were as she was either in the bed or in the process of getting out of bed. The 2 bullets that were not able to be matched to the Anschitz were a bullet definitely fired while she was in bed and a bullet fired as she was in bed or in the process of getting out of bed. The killer didn't shoot her in the head and lower chest then switch to the Anschutz.
Nevill was shot 4 times in the bedroom all to his left profile as he was sitting on the bed or in the process of getting out of bed. The killer didn't use the Anschutz to shoot his shoulder and graze him and another to shoot his lip and jaw.
Nevill was shot 4 times in the kitchen all after he was unconscious and all 4 in rapid succession. The killer didn't use 2 shots form the Anschutz and 2 from another weapon.
The bottom line is that you do not answer or respond properly to any of the points I raise. You are hellbent on trying to portray Jeremy as the killer, but Chummy you are so wrong...
I refuted your babble you are either too dishonest to admit it or too stupid to recognize it.
How utterly amazing, that all the victims you have listed, were all shot by one or other of these 10 rounds which could not have been fired via the anshuzt rifle. A feature which supports the case for duplication of shots into each of the aforementioned victims? You are blinded by your desire to keep Jeremy at the forefront of your mind as the killer. This is where you foolishly make a fundamental error. Since, there were not in reality only 10 bullets which could not be linked to the anshuzt rifle, there were in fact 11 in total, since bullet PV/20 was wrongly and incorrectly attributed as having been fired via the anshuzt rifle, when in fact it was fired via a police issue rifle. The ratio being therefore, as follows to the best of my knowledge and belief - Anshuzt rifle (14 shots fired), Bruno (10 shots fired) and police issue rifle (a single shot fired)
There is nothing amazing about the fact that bullets which stuck bone were damaged to such an extent that the rifling marks were no longer present. Your claim that because the rifling marks were not present this means they can't have been fired by the Anschutz is a lie. The fact there were not the requisite number of rifling marks to make an identification means the Anschutz could neither be ruled out as firing those shots nor proven to have fired them. Other evidence though proves it did fire these 10 shots as well as the 15 matched.
As for your made up nonsense about a police bullet being used on Sheila that is a perfect example of how you make up bull shit not me. You already lost each and every debate we had on that issue. What is your evidence? You have none.
A) the 2 bullet wound was consistent with a 22LR wound not a high velocity 5.56mm wound
B) the fatal shot was delivered within seconds of the nonfatal shot that you claim was fired by police
C) the bullet recovered by Vanezis matched the xray
D) that bullet was definitely a 22LR slug not a 5.56mm
E) there were no fragments from a metal jacket found in Sheila nor did the bullets removed from Sheila have any metal jacket- the police rounds were not only substantially larger with 3 times the velocity of the 22LR rounds they also were jacketed.
F) Sheila's blood was already dry when she was declared dead and all the police say she was found dead in the bedroom on the floor when they entered- no police heard any shots fired.
You have ZILCH to refute this evidence you have nothing at all by way of a basis to assert that she was shot by police. Since you have no evidence to refute this you will engage in another episode of simply tossing verbal insults at me instead of posing evidence to prove your allegations. You have no evidence you just repeat the same allegations over and over.
