Palm print on Bloodied Bible?

[David1819]

I have read about the idea that their is a palm print in blood on the bible.

I have managed to enlarge the photograph. I have then manipulated the photo to greatly contrast the paper pixels from the blood pixels to make it more easy to see what it is. the link is below

http://s13.postimg.org/gjm8bti2f/bloodied_bible_Copy.jpg

To me it does in some ways resemble a palm print to some extent. 

[Jan]

did you see the pictures Caroline posted the other day about this subject? they were interesting.

I was just looking at the horizontal lines on the bottom left hand side .They certainly don't look like they were caused by a  carpet.

but do you think you would see lines from the palm in the imprint?

[Jan]

If that is the correct size - my palm fits perfectly.

[Jan]

I think it is quite important because if it is not blood from the carpet it rules out the argument that someone moved the bible shortly after she died . If it was on her body when the raid team found her it does not prove that Jeremy did not do it but it might prove they did move things perhaps to check the rifle and to check she was dead and therefore the "set up Scene" the jury saw was not how she was found originally.

[Caroline]

I think it is quite important because if it is not blood from the carpet it rules out the argument that someone moved the bible shortly after she died . If it was on her body when the raid team found her it does not prove that Jeremy did not do it but it might prove they did move things perhaps to check the rifle and to check she was dead and therefore the "set up Scene" the jury saw was not how she was found originally.

Well, this has been my argument for quite some time - not everyone agrees but I am sticking to it. I believe that it IS a palm print and the negative produced by David clearly shows the pressure points and the lines.

[David1819]

did you see the pictures Caroline posted the other day about this subject? they were interesting.

I was just looking at the horizontal lines on the bottom left hand side .They certainly don't look like they were caused by a  carpet.

but do you think you would see lines from the palm in the imprint?

No can you post the link to Caroline's pictures please?

[Caroline]

No can you post the link to Caroline's pictures please?

[guest2181]

Well, this has been my argument for quite some time - not everyone agrees but I am sticking to it. I believe that it IS a palm print and the negative produced by David clearly shows the pressure points and the lines.

I'm one of those who doesn't agree.

I think it's impossible to tell, but if you were to try and replicate the blood staining, then you could use a number of different things, a Palm being one of them.

[Caroline]

I'm one of those who doesn't agree.

I think it's impossible to tell, but if you were to try and replicate the blood staining, then you could use a number of different things, a Palm being one of them.

I know 

[guest2181]

I know 

I know you know.  :D

[Caroline]

I know you know.  :D

I know, you know that I know! 

[guest2181]

I know, you know that I know! 

I didn't know that. 

[guest2181]

The bible appears to have a 'U' stain.

[guest2181]

The carpet appears to have a 'U' stain.

jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=4308;image

[guest2181]

Nobody appears to have bloody palms. Unless JB was responsible of course, then he may have had bloody palms.