Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all

[Adam]

so were the police searching the cupboard with there eyes closed.

Please refer to my post 166. And also the link I have supplied in post 173.

[Caroline]

they found the silncer in the gun cupboard after 4 policeman had searched the gun cupboar and not sen it.

yeah but to be fair, no one was looking for the silencer in the beginning, they also left guns because they weren't related.

[Caroline]

i would of thought dna testing would be able to tell the difrence between animal and human hair but then agian i would of thought if the hair belonged to any of the vicems a dna test would be able to establish that as well.

it could be the hair of one of the relatives.

the hair was never tested because it went missing Nugs.

[guest154]

yeah but to be fair, no one was looking for the silencer in the beginning, they also left guns because they weren't related.

It wouldn't be alarming to find a silencer in a gun cupboard really would it? If it had been hidden elsewhere in the house it would raise questions, but being where it belonged makes the most sense. At that point the severity of what the silencer wouldn't be clear, for obvious reasons.

[Caroline]

And you post bullshit. Don't try and ban me. Maggie said the word is  acceptable.

You're BS -

Supporting Jeremy for several months after I joined and I highlighted his certain guilt.

Being a coward and changing stance after Caroline and Susan did. Don't try to ban me for that, as you called me a coward after I went offline once. For about two hours.

Being a coward again and refusing to say why you changed stance. Unlike Susan who gave her reason straight away.

Just posting to or about me. After changing stance. Because you had nothing worthwhile to say on the case. A bit like you have just done while I was posting about the case. 

Trying to get me banned if I criticise Nugs. Although you are quite happy to let others criticise him and him criticise others.

Eventually admitting why you changed stance. But not thanking me.

Never creating a thread in two years. Then complaining when I do. Although they get big responses, including from you.

I think you'll find that BS is acceptable not what you have written tsk, tsk!! 

No one has anything to thank you for - quite the opposite in fact!

[nugnug]

the hair was never tested because it went missing Nugs.

well in that case it could of been an animal hair.

[nugnug]

yeah but to be fair, no one was looking for the silencer in the beginning, they also left guns because they weren't related.

weather they were looking for it or not i dont see how you could fail to notice it if it had blood on it.

[Caroline]

It wouldn't be alarming to find a silencer in a gun cupboard really would it? If it had been hidden elsewhere in the house it would raise questions, but being where it belonged makes the most sense. At that point the severity of what the silencer wouldn't be clear, for obvious reasons.

Exactly, hidden in the teapot or buried in a plant pot might raise suspicions but in the gun cupboard with other gunny things - when all points to murder/suicide? Nah! No reason to have a Eureka moment at that point.

[nugnug]

one or 2 of them maybe but all 4 of them i find that hard to belive.

[Caroline]

weather they were looking for it or not i dont see how you could fail to notice it if it had blood on it.

According the the errrr 'story (and which statement you care to read)' the blood wasn't immediately visible. Anyone looking around wouldn't have thought the silencer was related to the crime because they thought the killer was Sheila. She was dead with the murder weapon laying across here. Unlikely therefore, that the silencer was related to the incident. There were lots of guns in the house and they didn't take those either.

[Caroline]

one or 2 of them maybe but all 4 of them i find that hard to belive.

Because they weren't looking for it.

[guest154]

Because they weren't looking for it.

I've got a feeling you'll be repeating this alot. 

If they had taken the silencer or any of the weapons at that stage, I am sure a mountain would be made out of that too. Can't do right for wrong really.

I see nothing strange or suspicious about leaving something they weren't looking for.

[Caroline]

I've got a feeling you'll be repeating this alot. 

If they had taken the silencer or any of the weapons at that stage, I am sure a mountain would be made out of that too. Can't do right for wrong really.

I see nothing strange or suspicious about leaving something they weren't looking for.

Me either! No one even thought about the silencer until Pargeter said he's seen it on the rifle last time he was at WHF. And that was a few days after the tragedy (Friday 9th).

[guest154]

Me either! No one even thought about the silencer until Pargeter said he's seen it on the rifle last time he was at WHF. And that was a few days after the tragedy (Friday 9th).

Problem is people are looking back with hindsight - knowing what we know NOW they'd act differently than they did at the time.

[nugnug]

Because they weren't looking for it.

weather your looking for it or not how do you not notice somthing with blood  on it.