Author Topic: Main points supporters bring up on Jeremy's innocence:  (Read 1007 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44394
Main points supporters bring up on Jeremy's innocence:
« on: July 11, 2015, 11:59:AM »
Julie lied because she was, according to him, jilted.

Sheila was 'conveniently' alive right up until the raid team entered WHF.

Jeremy could not control Sheila and shoot her. .

Jeremy would not shoot Sheila twice.

The bike was brought over for Julie.

Neville phoned him.

Neville phoned the police.

He knew how to get into and out of WHF, but did not do so on the night and did not know about the lockable from outside kitchen window.

Sheila was capable of murder and had a rifle available on the night.

Julie was phoned at 3am for advice.

Sheila was upset after the apparent last supper conversation.

The rifle blood is contaminated.

Relatives and police have framed him.

There is no forensic evidence of him being at WHF on the night.

Forensic evidence showing Sheila did not commit the massacre is wrong.

His reported hated, resentment and greed are just rumours or lies from enemies.

His actions after the WHF massacre were exaggerated.

He's continued to protest his innocence for 30 years.



« Last Edit: July 11, 2015, 12:40:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44394
Re: Main points supporters bring up on Jeremy's innocence:
« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2015, 12:33:PM »
All these points have had threads created stating how weak the point is. There is simply no evidence to back up the allegations.

Most of the supporters claims are defensive points, reacting to the circumstantial and forensic evidence.
« Last Edit: July 11, 2015, 12:42:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.