Author Topic: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all  (Read 22500 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #165 on: July 01, 2015, 09:19:AM »
they found the silncer in the gun cupboard after 4 policeman had searched the gun cupboar and not sen it.

Nugnug

exactly why did the police not find it if they had searched the cupboard earlier.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44395
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #166 on: July 01, 2015, 09:22:AM »
Nugnug

exactly why did the police not find it if they had searched the cupboard earlier.

They were not looking for it. It was murder/suicide.

The silencer was in a box, under other boxes, guns and a dartboard, at the back of the gun cupboard.

Why were the police going to open every box at WHF if the culprit was Sheila ?
« Last Edit: July 01, 2015, 09:35:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #167 on: July 01, 2015, 09:25:AM »
The hair was apparently an inch long which sounds like a cat hair to me.


Hmm. A colourless hair of approximately an inch long? The one human who comes instantly to mind is, of course, Neville. However it COULD be difficult for the untrained eye to tell the difference between  colourless hair and the white blond hair which is what the twins appeared to have, but going on the length, I'd say it was unlikely to be hair belonging to either Neville or the boys, none of which, IMO, could have produced a hair that short.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44395
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #168 on: July 01, 2015, 09:33:AM »
It is quite possible the police would have done another search of WHF. After Julie approached them and other evidence had been processed.

As if happens, Stan Jones used his initiative. He was not happy with the situation and knew the relatives felt the same.

Jones could not become a rogue copper and go into WHF alone. So he gave the keys to AE to do a tidy up, aware they would probably also have a nose around.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2015, 09:43:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #169 on: July 01, 2015, 09:46:AM »
Nugnug

exactly why did the police not find it if they had searched the cupboard earlier.

well my guess is becouse it wasnt there.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44395
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #170 on: July 01, 2015, 09:49:AM »
well my guess is becouse it wasnt there.

See my post 166.

Why wouldn't the silencer be there ? The rifle came with the silencer as it was used for shooting vermin.

The only reason it wouldn't be there is if Jeremy disposed of it.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2015, 09:50:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #171 on: July 01, 2015, 09:50:AM »
When Adam asks a relevant question I think we should ALL have a party (but not invite Adam!) :D


Caroline, it's come to my notice that Adam never asks the kind of question which demonstrates ANY interest is what others think. He gives ad nauseum lists of HIS views and the question which, more often than not, follows is "Do other people agree that...............?"  He makes no attempt to join or share in a debate, rather, he peppers it with attempts to either hi-jack or rail-road, as is very obvious using this one as an example.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44395
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #172 on: July 01, 2015, 09:57:AM »

Caroline, it's come to my notice that Adam never asks the kind of question which demonstrates ANY interest is what others think. He gives ad nauseum lists of HIS views and the question which, more often than not, follows is "Do other people agree that...............?"  He makes no attempt to join or share in a debate, rather, he peppers it with attempts to either hi-jack or rail-road, as is very obvious using this one as an example.

And you post bullshit. Don't try and ban me. Maggie said the word is  acceptable.

You're BS -

Supporting Jeremy for several months after I joined and I highlighted his certain guilt.

Being a coward and changing stance after Caroline and Susan did. Don't try to ban me for that, as you called me a coward after I went offline once. For about two hours.

Being a coward again and refusing to say why you changed stance. Unlike Susan who gave her reason straight away.

Just posting to or about me. After changing stance. Because you had nothing worthwhile to say on the case. A bit like you have just done while I was posting about the case. 

Trying to get me banned if I criticise Nugs. Although you are quite happy to let others criticise him and him criticise others.

Eventually admitting why you changed stance. But not thanking me.

Never creating a thread in two years. Then complaining when I do. Although my threads get big responses, including from you.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2015, 09:49:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44395
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #173 on: July 01, 2015, 10:21:AM »
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5758.msg277625.html#msg277625

This is the thread on why the police would not find the silencer in the first three days.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #174 on: July 01, 2015, 10:25:AM »
And you post bullshit. Don't try and ban me. Maggie said the word is  acceptable.

You're BS

Supporting Jeremy for several months after I joined and I highlighted his certain guilt.

Being a coward and changing stance after Caroline and Susan did. Don't try to ban me for that, as you called me a coward after I went offline once. For about two hours.

Being a coward again and refusing to say why you changed stance. Unlike Susan who gave her reason straight away.

Just posting to or about me. After changing stance. Because you had nothing worthwhile to say on the case. A bit like you have just done while I was posting about the case. 

Trying to get me banned if I criticise Nugs. Although you are quite happy to let others criticise him and him criticise others.

Eventually admitting why you changed stance. But not thanking me.

Never creating a thread in two years. Then complaining when I do. Although they get big responses, including from you.


TEMPER TEMPER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #175 on: July 01, 2015, 10:33:AM »
And you post bullshit. Don't try and ban me. Maggie said the word is  acceptable.

You're BS

Supporting Jeremy for several months after I joined and I highlighted his certain guilt.

Being a coward and changing stance after Caroline and Susan did. Don't try to ban me for that, as you called me a coward after I went offline once. For about two hours.

Being a coward again and refusing to say why you changed stance. Unlike Susan who gave her reason straight away.

Just posting to or about me. After changing stance. Because you had nothing worthwhile to say on the case. A bit like you have just done while I was posting about the case. 

Trying to get me banned if I criticise Nugs. Although you are quite happy to let others criticise him and him criticise others.

Eventually admitting why you changed stance. But not thanking me.

Never creating a thread in two years. Then complaining when I do. Although they get big responses, including from you.



PS. "You're BS" AM I INDEED? You really are displaying your true colours, aren't you? Whilst it IS permissible to refer to a post as BS, It most certainly ISN'T permissible to say, as YOU just have, that a PERSON is BS. That IS a bannable offence, wouldn't you agree? It most certainly is an offence worthy of reporting.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2015, 10:35:AM by April »

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44395
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #176 on: July 01, 2015, 10:51:AM »


PS. "You're BS" AM I INDEED? You really are displaying your true colours, aren't you? Whilst it IS permissible to refer to a post as BS, It most certainly ISN'T permissible to say, as YOU just have, that a PERSON is BS. That IS a bannable offence, wouldn't you agree? It most certainly is an offence worthy of reporting.

My apologies. I have now inserted a ' - ' after BS.

You would be well aware that it was a title and my examples would be underneath.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2015, 10:51:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #177 on: July 01, 2015, 11:01:AM »
My apologies. I have now inserted a ' - ' after BS.

You would be well aware that it was a title and my examples would be underneath.



Thank-you for the apology, Adam.

It wouldn't have been necessary had you heeded the several posts which have advised you of the difference between "YOUR" which denotes ownership of and YOU'RE which is the shorter version of "you are".

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #178 on: July 01, 2015, 11:28:AM »
See my post 166.

Why wouldn't the silencer be there ? The rifle came with the silencer as it was used for shooting vermin.

The only reason it wouldn't be there is if Jeremy disposed of it.

so were the police searching the cupboard with there eyes closed.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44395
Re: Ending the SJ/1 nonsense once and for all
« Reply #179 on: July 01, 2015, 11:29:AM »
Hopefully Nugnug will expand on post 169.

Why wouldn't the silencer be there when the relatives visited ? Did Jeremy dispose of it ?

Or did the relatives bring their own silencer and expertly put hair, paint and Sheila's/Neville's/June's  blood on it ? After Stan Jones asked them to do a tidy up.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2015, 11:35:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.