0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I don't understand most people who actively set out to distort. I suppose some hate the police so much that they want to insist the police always lie and distort but it is hard to see what motivates others. TI suppose some like being part of an effort- but they could channel such into a real effort for someone where there is actual evidence of innocence, and some seek out attention- I am convinced that Mike is trying to garner attention with his claims of being so intimately involved including claiming to have seen bombshell photos. He uses such claims and claims of possessing evidence no one else does to attain minor celebrity status. Most of the campaign team are not identified anywhere so don't get notoriety so their exact angle is a mystery.
The Sun is saying Brett Collins contacted them. Collins had contacts with The Sun. It is true that Brett was hanging around Jeremy at the time. And attended the meeting with Fielder. If The Sun or Brett establishes that Jeremy/Brett made the first contact, then that's it. There would be only one reason why Jeremy/Brett would make the first move and request a meeting. Who needs a tape recorder ? Brett disappeared as quickly as he arrived after Jeremy got arrested. He wouldn't lie for Jeremy. What a pity he is not about, so many questions for him.
I do wonder how Brett would have had contacts of any worth with the Sun, he was a New Zealander over in the UK on holiday..... how did that work?
Maggie I did wonder about that I have only read it on here from some posts in 2011. I am sure Adam has a sauce he usually does
There is no proof. All supporters can do is claim the evidence is wrong and mention previous cases.
whats that got to do with anything it was feilder who made it up in the first place they just reprinted his lies.
you dont need proof to prove a proven liar is a liar its already been proved once somone has been proved to have lied before the burden is on them to prove there telling the truth.
Who said Fielder made it up?
because when Jeremy was arrested the first time, Brett spoke to Fielder.
We know that the allegation is that Jeremy used the same words to describe the pictures to Fielder as he had to Colin. This proves nothing at all though. Colin himself uses the same words to describe the pictures that he took possession of from jeremy in his statement of 24th September: "I think I would describe these slides as "soft pornography" as they were quite explicit in detail" Collins, Mugford, EP... lots of people would have or could have found out about the existence of the photos. They were not the best kept secret were they? The Sun and Fielder would not have had to rely on Bamber as the source for the existence of these photos and the description used by Fielder was also the same as Colin described them himself. Fielder has previously been shown to have reported that an innocent witness to a shooting was an ex prostitute who ran an escort agency and was married to a drug peddler. All of this was lies in order to discredit an inconvenient witness on behalf of the MOD and police. Or as Adam would put it "the editor will have made sure the story was watertight". He has been shown to be a lying propagandist for vested interests but you cling to the belief that perhaps he did some proper reporting on his weekends off
Fielder wrote the "Tart of Gib" story which alleged that she was an ex prostitute, ran an escort agency and was married to a drug peddler. All of this was lies invented by Fielder, it's not even in dispute.
have you had a read of the opening post in full.
