Author Topic: New video:  (Read 49261 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Re: Re: New video:
« Reply #45 on: May 02, 2015, 10:43:PM »
Do you think it is right that these officers appear in these films ? Personally I am surprised they contribute . They believe he is guilty , they have done their job - why on earth fuel the fire ?

I don't find it too strange. These are the men that proved Bamber guilty, their intelligence and honour is often brought into disrepute by supporters and Bamber in a public fashion - they have a story to tell, they were there, I find it interesting to be honest. The Yorkshire Ripper officers tell their stories too, not uncommon really.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Re: Re: New video:
« Reply #46 on: May 02, 2015, 10:47:PM »
Well they were criticised by the Dickinson report as well . But to remain professional I think they should just keep quiet and not glamorise the case . IMO of course.



Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Re: Re: New video:
« Reply #47 on: May 02, 2015, 10:48:PM »
I may of course re-assess that opinion when I have watched the whole video .  :)

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Re: Re: New video:
« Reply #48 on: May 02, 2015, 10:50:PM »
what date was the funeral? Just wondered if they said it was after ,it might tie up with the document that Mike posted about reporting it in Sept ?

Was it the 16th August?

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Re: Re: New video:
« Reply #49 on: May 02, 2015, 11:02:PM »
not sure . well if it was then the silencer was found before then and already handed in.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Re: Re: New video:
« Reply #50 on: May 03, 2015, 02:23:AM »
Was it the 16th August?

Yes it was the 16th

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Re: Re: New video:
« Reply #51 on: May 03, 2015, 12:09:PM »
 Looks psychopathic ? More soft in the head to me,not altogether with us,in that last pic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Re: Re: New video:
« Reply #52 on: May 03, 2015, 12:16:PM »
Looks psychopathic ? More soft in the head to me,not altogether with us,in that last pic.

Oh he was very much 'with us' he was smiling at the guy who took the picture in an arrogant defiant manner. To me, he certainly has the cold stare of a psychopath in many of his pictures.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Re: Re: New video:
« Reply #53 on: May 03, 2015, 12:27:PM »
Oh he was very much 'with us' he was smiling at the guy who took the picture in an arrogant defiant manner. To me, he certainly has the cold stare of a psychopath in many of his pictures.






Arrogance and defiance====Confidence.  Something which nobody liked to see as it got their backs up.

Psychopathy has got nothing whatsoever to do with how a person looks. Going back a couple of hundred years,I have a pic of my mum's grannie's family and if ever you saw it,you'd think they'd all " escaped ".
Talk about the Adams family. Yet mum had told me that they were the lovliest and kindest people that she grew up with as a child. There are 8 of them with the same stare.It's like a horror film.

I remember as a child,an aunt of mine who resembled Ethel Barrymore,the actress,and she had " mad staring eyes " that put the fear of God into me as an 8 year old.

So looks are nothing to go by. Jeremy looks quite normal against the old pics that I've got.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Re: Re: New video:
« Reply #54 on: May 03, 2015, 12:58:PM »
 I don't read much into those so-called professionals who can " see " psychopathy.

After the Professor Sir Roy Meadows debacle,I have a certain amount of mistrust for those who call themselves professionals. Meadows had been responsible for sending innocent women to prison,who,he'd said,had murdered their babies/children.

The pathologist in the Ian Tomlinson case,again,was supposedly a trusted and accredited forensic pathologist.

Both these men were struck off the medical register.

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: New video:
« Reply #55 on: May 03, 2015, 01:47:PM »
Thread now open.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: New video:
« Reply #56 on: May 03, 2015, 02:01:PM »
Question for Harters: Is this the downstairs or the upstairs bathroom at WHF?


Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: New video:
« Reply #57 on: May 03, 2015, 02:07:PM »
Must be downstairs, window and curtains correspond with this:



A strange placement of the toilet - the door cant open properly.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: New video:
« Reply #58 on: May 03, 2015, 02:26:PM »
It was interesting that the narrator said 'despite all the evidence, he continued to protest his innocence'.

This suggests criminals who have a similar amount of incriminating evidence against them will confess.

There are lots of reasons he has not confessed. Being innocent the least likely.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New video:
« Reply #59 on: May 03, 2015, 02:37:PM »
Good to see Kerry Daynes agreeing that he's a classic case psychopath. Not sure why this comment was removed as it's part of the discussion on this video?
Few people have the imagination for reality