There are myths and lies on both sides. I welcome an overhaul to get rid of them all.
Those myths are repeated over and over until they are accepted as fact, thus rendering the overall picture of the case misty.
The right thing for everyone to do is to read all possible documents on the case, books excluded. I have to admit that it can be hard for me - especially the hand written ones. They are in English and sometimes hard to impossible to dechipher. I think it is easier to "guess" words if English is your first language.
Alias, it often seems to me that there is as much that is UNknown about this case, as there is that is indisputably KNOWN. We have no clear cut proof of what went on inside WHF, either in action, conversation or timings so it's only natural that we'll make up stories to fit with what we believe. Those stories, which are in fact, MYTHS, take on lives of their own and become accepted as FACTS.
I would like nothing more than to see ALL myth removed but you can rest assured that facts which don't meet with the approval of either side are likely to be labeled myths. In fact, WHATever is said by WHOMever in their witness statements, is very likely to be refuted by someone else.........................and that's BEFORE it reaches the forum where we've probably ALL been guilty of a little "bending and stretching" at some point, without necessarily knowing it.
