Fraudulent Log?

[Caroline]

Been moving posts by the looks of things lol.

Yep! 

[scipio_usmc]

No, this is supposed to be the same log, You can tell because the same scribbles have been copied but Tolleshunt is spelled differently on one - no 'e'

This is one of the issues where you make no sense at all. Allegedly there are 2 verisons of the same form that differ only in the spelling of Tolleshunt. They made several copies of the same documents and sometimes in the process they made errors so that the copies did not match.  Thus it is impossible to tell which of these 2 is the original and which is the copy.  Big deal since they are the same except for an insignificant issue.  How is this supposed to suggest that there is another form out there that no one has seen with different times listed for the calls?

There is no reason or need to change the time or anything else on the logs. If they were going to change something it would have been to correct that only 1 body had bene found in the kitchen but they didn't bother.

[lookout]

Did they only have one notebook between them ?

[Caroline]

This is one of the issues where you make no sense at all. Allegedly there are 2 verisons of the same form that differ only in the spelling of Tolleshunt. They made several copies of the same documents and sometimes in the process they made errors so that the copies did not match.  Thus it is impossible to tell which of these 2 is the original and which is the copy.  Big deal since they are the same except for an insignificant issue.  How is this supposed to suggest that there is another form out there that no one has seen with different times listed for the calls?

There is no reason or need to change the time or anything else on the logs. If they were going to change something it would have been to correct that only 1 body had bene found in the kitchen but they didn't bother.

Calm down skipo, don't be losing your britches!! You've stuck your ore in again without know the full story. You really must learn to take a deep breath and think before stepping in and assuming. I'm NOT talking about the 'events log' I'm talking about the phone log. 

[susan]

Ha Ha lookout you are a little rascal

[Jane]

Calm down skipo, don't be losing your britches!! You've stuck your ore in again without know the full story. You really must learn to take a deep breath and think before stepping in and assuming. I'm NOT talking about the 'events log' I'm talking about the phone log. 

Hmmm, Scipio sans britches. Sounds interesting

[Caroline]

This is the log in question;

[No-Bits]

This is the log in question;

That is the same as this one posted 3 years ago:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,732.0.html

[scipio_usmc]

Calm down skipo, don't be losing your britches!! You've stuck your ore in again without know the full story. You really must learn to take a deep breath and think before stepping in and assuming. I'm NOT talking about the 'events log' I'm talking about the phone log. 

I am calm and I know you mean the phone log.  But if they were going to doctor logs they would want to doctor the event log and if they were going to doctor the time of West's log they would have made the time match the time on Bonnett's log not choose a time that doesn't match.

Your claim is that there are 2 versions of the same document that differ only in the spelling of the word Tolleshunt.  (We have no idea if someone just wrote in an E on one of the copies to correct the mispelling or what because we can't look at the two side by side) .  The 2 documents in question do not have any material differences so there is no conflict in the points tha tmatter both list the same time. This time is different from the time that is on Bonnett's by 10 minutes.

You suggest that because there is an E in Tolleshunt on 1 of the forms that you believe that neither is the original and that there is another one out there we have not seen that is being hidden which contains a different time or some other material difference.

That is a nonsensical leap. If they were going to alter the time they woudl have made it match Bonnetts.  Bonnett's log is the one accepted as having the correct times based on the totality of the evidence. The only need to change the time was to make it match Bonnett's but it doesn't so obviously such was not doctored.

The allegations it was doctored to conceal that West had spoken to Nevill not Jeremy and that West lied in his statements is preposterous. 

So I don't follow your claims at all, they make no sense no matter how hard I try to understand them.

 

 

[lookout]

Ha Ha lookout you are a little rascal

More like a roll of toilet paper,Susan,where each of them recorded their bit per sheet. They might just as well have used one for what use they all were and for what sense it made.

[scipio_usmc]

Hmmm, Scipio sans britches. Sounds interesting

I don't think I have ever worn britches I don't even know precisely what britches look like, I have worn a kilt but I didn't wear underwear so that was not good when people looked under it.

[Alias]

I don't think I have ever worn britches I don't even know precisely what britches look like, I have worn a kilt but I didn't wear underwear so that was not good when people looked under it.

I´m curious - not good for whom? 

[lookout]

Two peas and a maggot ? That would account for your bumptious attitude.

[susan]

Ha Ha Scipio did you not have the goods to view under the kilt

[Jane]

I don't think I have ever worn britches I don't even know precisely what britches look like, I have worn a kilt but I didn't wear underwear so that was not good when people looked under it.

Perhaps you know them as breeches. It isn't traditional for underwear to be worn under kilts but sometimes it's necessary to check just in case someone has cheated.