Author Topic: ECHR ..... now - Killers' life terms 'breached their human rights'  (Read 54692 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
Hi Caroline  thanks for that as the news at 6.30 this morning said he had lost his Appeal and I have been quite depressed all morning just in to hear great news on the TV.  The Reporter this morning probably still asleep.  Next we have Mason Doyle's book to look forward to can't wait must get some reading glasses ;D ;D ;D ;D ;) ;) ;) ;)


Susan, I think the reporter you heard this morning at 6.30 must have been one of the anti squad because unless the decision was reached yesterday, there's no way the outcome could have been known that early in the morning.

Caroline R

  • Guest
april I am not quite mad I heard on the news at 6.30 and the link curiousessex put up middle of the morning confirmed what I had heard now it was updated at 13.24 and it was different.  I had a total morning of depression.

Did they not just mention that he had lost two previous appeals?  ;D

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Hi Caroline  I have got to the stage I don't know what they said but another member of the forum heard it as well and she thought she was going mad but it was 6.30 a.m. remember but the link curiousessex put up this morning reads differently now so who knows what ;D ;D ;D ;D  Think I know what happened I was walking past the TV room and heard the name Jeremy Bamber so rushed in and maybe heard only half of the story and maybe they were referring to his previous application but all is well that ends well ;D ;D ;D ;D
« Last Edit: July 09, 2013, 05:19:PM by susan »

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6672
BBC News online got it wrong this morning as well.  They obviously had two alternative articles written in anticipation of the decision announcement and they initially posted the wrong one.  They corrected the mistake at about 10.30 am.  I have seen this happen once before when they reported a guilty verdict at a trial at the Old Bailey when the jury had just returned a unanimous not guilty verdict.

 
« Last Edit: July 10, 2013, 10:21:AM by ngb1066 »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
I know susie, it feels good for Jeremy at the moment hope its not just cos I have had too much sun.....all that Vitamin D swirling around ;D




Hi girls,,what I objected to was the fact that Jeremy was " clumped " with two REAL murderers.Peter Moore being a monster,which when putting him with Jeremys' name,,gives a bad reflection.
Other than that,,let's hope that some bloody-minded person doesn't twist it to a review every 5 years.!

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
ngb thank you so much for posting that information I have spent all day trying to convince the forum I am not mad now they can all grovel to me and say sorry ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Caroline R

  • Guest

BBC News online got it wrong this morning as well.  They obviously had two alternative articles written in anticipation of the decision announcement and they initially posed the wrong one.  They corrected the mistake at about 10.30 am.  I have seen this happen once before when they reported a guilty verdict at a trial at the Old Bailey when the jury had just returned a unanimous not gulity verdict.

 

Thanks for the clarification NGB!!

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
ngb thank you so much for posting that information I have spent all day trying to convince the forum I am not mad now they can all grovel to me and say sorry ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Susan dear, YOU weren't the one who was wrong. How is it possible for then to announce, at 6.30am, the answer to a question which has yet to be asked.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
I must say I was baffled myself,but thought it was an oversight,,or just a gormless person.!

Caroline R

  • Guest

Susan dear, YOU weren't the one who was wrong. How is it possible for then to announce, at 6.30am, the answer to a question which has yet to be asked.

According to BBC New at One, the incident at WHF occurred in the 1970's  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline tyler

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2395

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
dear april  how was I to know what date the decision was to be taken it could have been yesterday late on who am I to reason why I just believe the BBC ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
lookout who is gormless (love that word) me or the BBC ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
dear april  how was I to know what date the decision was to be taken it could have been yesterday late on who am I to reason why I just believe the BBC ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


As do we all, Susan dear ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ??? ??? ??? ???

Offline Jo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 395
According to BBC New at One, the incident at WHF occurred in the 1970's  ;D ;D ;D ;D

I think the BBC are having a bad day, this morning, Jeremy had lost the appeal.