Detective Chief Supt. Ainsley, who led the 2nd part of the investigation (SC/786/85), KNEW the danger of having to admit to the fact that relatives had possession and access to the silencer and blood of Sheila's on the bible, between 10th and 12th August 1985, and that if such facts were admitted to, no jury in the land could resist having concerns about the possibility of contanination of the silencer whilst relatives had a source of Sheila's blood from which to contaminate the silencer before they handed the silencer over to police...
Hence, why DC Hammersley lied about seizing the second bible, exhibit DRH/44, from the scene on 8th August 1985, even though he wasn't on duty at the scene, that date...