« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Fingerprint-form  (Read 872 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Fingerprint-form
« on: January 03, 2014, 10:28:PM »
Why "Sheila Caffell" and "J Bamber"? As far as I know that could as well mean JUNE Bamber as JEREMY Bamber. Why just "J"?

Please read attached statement by Detective Inspector, Ronald Walter Cook. (Can be found in full in the "Documents in the melting pot" thread.

« Last Edit: January 03, 2014, 10:28:PM by Alias »
Logged

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Fingerprint-form
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2014, 12:10:AM »
Quote from: Alias on January 03, 2014, 10:28:PM
Why "Sheila Caffell" and "J Bamber"? As far as I know that could as well mean JUNE Bamber as JEREMY Bamber. Why just "J"?

Please read attached statement by Detective Inspector, Ronald Walter Cook. (Can be found in full in the "Documents in the melting pot" thread.


You're right Alias, it's clear they mean Sheila but J. Bamber could mean either Jeremy or June. More weird stuff!!
Logged
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Fingerprint-form
« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2014, 08:59:AM »
Very misleading and totally unacceptable considering there were two initials the same.Bad investigating.
Logged

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Fingerprint-form
« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2014, 09:02:AM »
With just the way the case was handled,begs a re-trial.
Logged

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Fingerprint-form
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2014, 02:29:PM »
Sloppy work, and it could mean either, how is one to know?
Logged

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: Fingerprint-form
« Reply #5 on: January 05, 2014, 01:07:PM »
Quote from: Alias on January 03, 2014, 10:28:PM
Why "Sheila Caffell" and "J Bamber"? As far as I know that could as well mean JUNE Bamber as JEREMY Bamber. Why just "J"?

Please read attached statement by Detective Inspector, Ronald Walter Cook. (Can be found in full in the "Documents in the melting pot" thread.


The form is signed 'J. Bamber' by Jeremy to confirm that the finger prints on the form belonged to him.

June had been murdered and was therefore unable to sign her name.  ::)

It's not sloppy work, it's an accurate description of a document, it cannot be described as being Signed Jeremy Bamber because it is signed J. Bamber.
Logged

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Fingerprint-form
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2014, 01:20:PM »
Quote from: Snow-Bits on January 05, 2014, 01:07:PM
The form is signed 'J. Bamber' by Jeremy to confirm that the finger prints on the form belonged to him.

June had been murdered and was therefore unable to sign her name.  ::)

It's not sloppy work, it's an accurate description of a document, it cannot be described as being Signed Jeremy Bamber because it is signed J. Bamber.

I must admit, I did suspect this when scanning this thread / letter moments ago.
Logged

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Fingerprint-form
« Reply #7 on: January 05, 2014, 03:17:PM »
Quote from: Snow-Bits on January 05, 2014, 01:07:PM
The form is signed 'J. Bamber' by Jeremy to confirm that the finger prints on the form belonged to him.

June had been murdered and was therefore unable to sign her name.  ::)

It's not sloppy work, it's an accurate description of a document, it cannot be described as being Signed Jeremy Bamber because it is signed J. Bamber.

OK, with the signature it clears it up.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »