"All People Are Bad And Should Be Killed"

[Jane]

How is it ever possible to substantiate someone else's reasons and motives? It's not as if someone accused of a crime like this is going to write "I did it cos I'm greedy and I hate my parents" and sign it in his own blood is it..

So you ask Daniel what he believes and then tell him what you don't want to hear, hardly a fair line of questioning, is it?

Bridget, Daniel is reading criminology. I was hoping for something from him far more profound and objective than the assumption of Jeremy's guilt and the hearsay of him hating his parents.

[susan]

Hello Maggie

think Daniel-Day is a Geordie Lad studying at Winchester University

[maggie]

Hello Maggie

think Daniel-Day is a Geordie Lad studying at Winchester University

Oh ok I thought he was from Winchester and studying at Newcastle uni?  Sorry Daniel  did I make a mistake?

[susan]

Hello Maggie his introduction was a little ambiguous so it was easy to think he was studying at Newcastle University He said I am a student from good old Newcasrtle Upon Tyne.  Just goes to show I have read a couple of his posts

[Jane]

Hello Maggie his introduction was a little ambiguous so it was easy to think he was studying at Newcastle University He said I am a student from good old Newcasrtle Upon Tyne.  Just goes to show I have read a couple of his posts

Susan, thus far his posts have seemed to me to be rather like all parties in opposition. Keen to point to the failings of the government without offering anything of their own. No doubt he would use the same argument of us :D

[killingeve]

I'm not trying to achieve anything, this is a discussion as far as I'm concerned. You asked me a question about the 3 shell cases in the kitchen and we have debated upon it.   

My objectives are clear enough to me, if they aren't clear to you. I like to have an idea on where things were found, because that gives me some answers and puts it all into perspective. You don't have to join in or read my posts...lol

Can anyone achieve anything on here?  There is more than me that goes round and round in circles lol 

  Only asking 

[susan]

Hello april

I have stopped reading Daniel's posts as he does not appear to be offering anything constructive about the case.  He is entitled to his opinions and to express them as he thinks fit but I am not obliged to read them.

[Lugg]

I can see you are not a very tolerant person and equally not a person with whom I feel comfortable with in any serious debate. If you want to call what I say 'tripe' then fine, but I suspect you find it difficult to understand that people hold different opinions to you Lugg.  I for one am disturbed by your rather catty remarks at anyone who does not hold the view that Bamber is innocent. If you would like to debate with me over the case - great. If not, please feel free to abstain.

You are not interested in debate anyway as far as I can see? To me you are just another troll who is intent on being nasty to anyone you don't agree with.  So just do us all a favour and piss of back to the so called red forum where you will find ideal company with fellow trolls.

[Lugg]

Fuuny Lugg, there was me thinking that you only tow the 'innocent line' because looking back on your posts I am struggling to see exactly where you are actually questioning Bamber's innocence. If you could politely point me to your posts where this is deabted and under question I would be very grateful.

I fed up with being polite to you daniel. Just piss off and that will suit me fine. I hate trolls and am not interested in debating with thos who can only see the light that comes in through the chinks of their own roofs.

[Lugg]

What is it with you lot? Have you all been sucking the same 'I hate anyone that thinks Bamber is guilty' spoon? I am NOT here to wind anyone up. Please learn to differentiate between the two. I am simply debating.I am studying criminology and the case is highly interesting. If you think I am someone else, no problem at all. I know who I am. I do not know who you are but what am I supposed to 'bring to the debate' exactly?
I am sorry I do not really think he is innocent. I personally suspect he is guilty. I am not 100% convinced but that's why I am here. If you want someone to churn out endless 'why I think he is innocent' and join the mutual admiration society so we can all stand around happily agreeing with each others theories and congratualting each other on a job well done and casually basking the the light of self-satisfaction. I am not the man. Sorry. You asked me to 'try something innovative' what have you in mind exactly? I am all ears.

With your biased attitude towards people you won't get far in criminology. I'd choose another career if I were you.

[Lugg]

But just because Cook didn't believe there to have been a "violent fight" doesn't mean he didn't believe there had been a struggle. The light fitting which one poster insists was broken when Nevill was clubbed, could equally well have happened if a weapon was being held over someones head to prevent it being taken from them.

I'm afraid that you cannot debate with Daniel as he is obviously at the pinnacle of his learning and does not need anyone else to ahem "enlighten" him.

[Lugg]

Hi Daniel, maybe we started off on the wrong foot.     Did you say you were a sudent at Newcastle University?

It was HE started who off on the wrong foot Maggie.

[Lugg]

How is it ever possible to substantiate someone else's reasons and motives? It's not as if someone accused of a crime like this is going to write "I did it cos I'm greedy and I hate my parents" and sign it in his own blood is it..

So you ask Daniel what he believes and then tell him what you don't want to hear, hardly a fair line of questioning, is it?

Perhaps she should have asked Steve-uk? He can give enough reasons. In fact you would would think he was related to Bamber to know him so "perfectly".

[Lugg]

Bridget, Daniel is reading criminology. I was hoping for something from him far more profound and objective than the assumption of Jeremy's guilt and the hearsay of him hating his parents.

I'm afraid he can only see as far as his nose April? Totally the wrong attitude for someone studying criminology.

[Lugg]

Hello april

I have stopped reading Daniel's posts as he does not appear to be offering anything constructive about the case.  He is entitled to his opinions and to express them as he thinks fit but I am not obliged to read them.

That is because he is just reitterating what others have said on here before. I'm afraid that does not take much imagination unfortunately. Consequently you will not get much to chew on from him.