Well I agree that there is a nature versus nurture debate as you can get on a parent's wavelength if they are constantly putting themselves out for you. Unfortunately with June and Jeremy this just wasn't the case. Adopted children also miss out on their natural grandparents which can be a real shame.
With respect Steve I cannot agree with you.
I have a perfectly normal loving and healthy relationship with my children, far more so than many natural parents and they adored my parents and my parents were fantastic grandparents who loved them completely.
You are making sweeping statements about adoptive relationships, I would not deny what you suggest may happen but I would bet the problems are much deeper than just not having anything in common with members of your family.
Of course some adoptive children do not gel with their parents and I would guess that imo would be the parents fault in baby adoptions for not providing the necessary bonding and nconditional love which is necessary in all mother/father/baby relationships.
In a well bonded adoptive or natural family where the child is at the centre of the family any problems due to adoption would come from outside the family as they grow and develop not within the family. in any family setting if the gel of love is strong most things can be overcome.
IMO in a happy family the stresses and strains and differences are more about changes in morals etc between the generations rather than anything else and are completely normal in any family situation.
The particular problems in the Bamber family seemed to stem from the fact that the relationship between Sheila and Jeremy and their parents appears to have been highly dysfunctional. The lack of bonding and unconditional love and understanding allowed other emotions such as anger, hate and desperation to grow in the void.
