I think your description of Pros versus anti's (for want of a better description), is ridiculous, it's an attempt to stereotype, the truth of the matter is that there are fanaticals amongst both groups, and there are genuine reasonable people amongst both groups, to suggest otherwise is in essence one of my pet grumbles and it simply shows a tendancy to catagorise.
Take the title of this thread for example, it is leading, innaccurate and quite frankly the type of thing I have come to expect from certain posters (on both sides). If it was worded as a question, such as "hey look what I've found, what do you think this means?", then I have no problem, but that's not the case.
What is even worse, is that the original poster in this thread, spends a great deal of time and effort berrating other people for making assumptions and coming up with things that can not be substantiated or not based on anything of merit, but only if they don't conform to her views. Hypocrisy is king it seems. 
It sounds as if you were offended by what I said. Giving offence was not my intention. I was making observations, not pointing fingers. As to the title of the thread not being appropriate, I really couldn't tell you what the title was/is, as I pick threads by the last person to post because a witty, provacative, intelligent post will make any topic worth reading.
I re read my original post to find where I'd "stereotyped" anyone. I don't believe I did. I spoke of the "greatest difference," not the ONLY difference. I allow that there are reasonable and fanatical posters from both sides. I would never refer to you as fanatical, but neither do I feel that your response to my post was entirely reasonable given that my own was neither insult nor attack, but an observation of human behaviour.
