The RIDDLE of the BACK STAIRCASE.

[Bridget]

So...er.. who's your favourite to win X factor Mike?

[mike tesko]

Another typical response from you, how can people believe you when you won't even show then the statements of the first people to the scene, a prerequisite I would have thought when when investigating a case.

Really showing your true colours here Mike, although to be fair I was only responding to your suggestion that I am somehow spreading false information, it doesn't seem to be the case now does it, one should perhaps look a little closer to home.

If you hate liars, why do you behave as you do?

Why did you turn up at Osea Leisure for a directors meeting attempting to look after Jeremys interests? What is your motivation here Mike, it's certainly not to find the truth.

Fuck off, I was only acting on Jeremy's instructions when I went to the meeting, and I have a witness to prove it...

Come on then, lets hear your poxy excuse about why all these different parker hale silencers became merged into the same one?

[-Harters-]

I was only acting on Jeremy's instructions when I went to the meeting, and I have a witness to prove it...

Come on then, lets hear your poxy excuse about why all these different parker hale silencers became merged into the same one?

You want me to explain your theory? 

I've never suggested such a merger took place, quite the opposite in fact.

[mike tesko]

You want me to explain your theory? 

I've never suggested such a merger took place, quite the opposite in fact.

What a load of bollocks.

[mike tesko]

What a load of bollocks

Shame you are gonna miss all the other material I am about to post on the forum which shows you lot in a bad light...

Think I might just ban you, that way you ain't ever coming back, but I will give you the opportunity to leave of your own accord, first...

[lookout]

What a load of bollocks

I wouldn't upset yourself,Mike. Nobody's worth getting upset over.

At least I know the difference in what's right,,and what isn't,and this case stinks to high heaven.

[-Harters-]

What a load of bollocks, ain't it about time you fucked off....

I'm not sure that is a particularly strong argument.

I don't think asking people to prove your own theories is going to further your cause either.

[-Harters-]

Shame you are gonna miss all the other material I am about to post on the forum which shows you lot in a bad light...

Think I might just ban you, that way you ain't ever coming back, but I will give you the opportunity to leave of your own accord, first...

Thought you wanted the truth, banning people for disagreeing with you is certainly one way of removing the opposition.

[lookout]

Thought you wanted the truth, banning people for disagreeing with you is certainly one way of removing the opposition.

No need to antagonise though,is there.?

[-Harters-]

No need to antagonise though,is there.?

Surely that should be addressed to Mike right?

[lookout]

Surely that should be addressed to Mike right?

If I'd have meant it for Mike,then I'd have addressed him.  It wasn't,so it's all yours.

[-Harters-]

Anyway, moving on. An edited bump.

I think it's pretty obvious that just because something hasn't or hadn't been shown on the forum, it isn't an indication that it didn't exist.

Campion, Mike has kindly supplied these plans which may assist you in understanding the layout a little better:

[jon]

Another typical response from you, how can people believe you when you won't even show then the statements of the first people to the scene, a prerequisite I would have thought when when investigating a case.

Really showing your true colours here Mike, although to be fair I was only responding to your suggestion that I am somehow spreading false information, it doesn't seem to be the case now does it, one should perhaps look a little closer to home.

If you hate liars, why do you behave as you do?

Why did you turn up at Osea Leisure for a directors meeting attempting to look after Jeremys interests? What is your motivation here Mike, it's certainly not to find the truth.

You once claimed you was a former policeman in ' The Met ' , was you lying then or was you lying a few month's later when you claimed you was a architect ?

[-Harters-]

I know I said I will lay off from Mike, and I will.

I would however like to highlight my original point simply by inviting people to read the post below, and then view the floor plans posted by Mike and copied in my post above.

This isn't intended to insult or antagonise, but is a direct result of defending myself against Mikes claims that he has made in this thread.

People can judge for themselves.

I think the questions raised by Campion about the ommision or misrepresentation of the so called back stairs at whf is a very interesting one, and that Essex police had a reason for not providing information to allow other mere mortals to understand and fathom out what went wrong with the firearms operation once police forced entry into the premises from 7:30am, onward...

[campion]

Please forgive me for 'bumping' this topic