Author Topic: Congratulations  (Read 50776 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jeffreysimons98

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #360 on: July 19, 2012, 11:10:PM »
roch i can provide proof who mat really is

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #361 on: July 19, 2012, 11:12:PM »
mat you sound bitter towards stephanie hall is it because she announced she is a witness for jackie

A witness? What? A witness to what?

roch i can provide proof who mat really is

No you can't, your proof is as fake as you I'm sure. If you want to claim I am a woman - then Roch is more than welcome to have my phone number.
But we've already been through this before, Steph. You're just never happy.

Neil

  • Guest
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #362 on: July 19, 2012, 11:13:PM »
Mat, do me a favour, don't respond to this goading.  You are playing into their hands.
I thought that goading was off limits anyway!

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #363 on: July 19, 2012, 11:14:PM »
A mistake she made more than once though, Keira banned me so many times and had to unban me. It wasn't a mistake, Maggie.

Did you PM Keira and tell her "Mat has hacked my phone!" Yes or no?
Mat I pmd keira, I sent her a post which she received and I returned to the forum where I saw my post to keira which she had received also on the open forum. I hadn't posted anything onto the forum only a private pm to keira. I immediately pmd keira who had just replied to the post and told her what had happened. There was all sort of stuff going on on the forum cos you were accusing Jackie of altering a threatening pm from you and keira thought both myself and jackies phones were being hacked. It was not premeditated by keira it was a mistake but if you couldnt blame me you had to blame keira it was a mistake mat.

Offline Aunt Agatha

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 562
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #364 on: July 19, 2012, 11:14:PM »
You certainly don't like Mat do you Jeffrey?

Why take all this personally and go to such great lengths to find out who 'he really is?'

Why are you reacting the way you are Jeffrey?


Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #365 on: July 19, 2012, 11:16:PM »
roch i can provide proof who mat really is

Well if you feel it is a matter of concern, deal with it external to the open forum.  In the meantime i have no choice but to ban you for bandying names about already and general mischief. 

Neil

  • Guest
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #366 on: July 19, 2012, 11:19:PM »
Well if you feel it is a matter of concern, deal with it external to the open forum.  In the meantime i have no choice but to ban you for bandying names about already and general mischief.
Phew!

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #367 on: July 19, 2012, 11:20:PM »
Roch, you know that was Steph, right?

Neil

  • Guest
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #368 on: July 19, 2012, 11:22:PM »
Roch, you know that was Steph, right?
Mat, be grateful you weren't accused of being Kevin Craigie!

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #369 on: July 19, 2012, 11:23:PM »
Roch, you know that was Steph, right?

It is suspected that the username was one or two people or both, inclusive of Steph Hall.

-Harters-

  • Guest
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #370 on: July 19, 2012, 11:24:PM »
Admin / Mods can only call things as they see them.  I wasn't intending on banning you or anyone else.  No disrespect to Jackie but I don't think Mat can be blamed for much to do with Jackie, imho.  Mat has been challenged by mods on a number of occasions. 

We could have a brutal regime with regard to modding, in which posters from the other side of the fence would find it difficult to survive on here.  We would end up with Curious Essex and possibly Vic, maybe Bridget and virtually nobody else.  I've not been advised to take that kind of line.

I think you missed me off the list.  ???  ;D

Personally I don't think the touchy feely approach is working, why do some members have to tread on egg shells, yet others have free reign to goad, be rude and antagonistic with every post?

I know your views on the case and you know mine, yet we can still get along, I'd also bet my bottom dollar that you would agree with me when I say that Grahames recent activity is disruptive and uncalled for, he's making a fool of himself. Likewise I'm sure you would agree that old Jefferey has or had another user name and she has been less than polite with every post she's made.

I think either action needs to taken against these disruptive people, regardless of their views, or we all need to accept that this is normal and acceptable.

Maybe I'm putting you on the spot and perhaps that's wrong.


guest154

  • Guest
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #371 on: July 19, 2012, 11:24:PM »
Mat, be grateful you weren't accused of being Kevin Craigie!

I was! Haha. On the other forum about 2 weeks ago Steph said she had proof I was Kevin, I had no idea who the hell he was.
So then John started to believe it - so I was like "Someone can call me if they want to so that we can put this behind us" John chose to, we spoke about 5 minutes and he told Steph that I wasn't Kevin and she apologised.

Now I'm someone else.  :o

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #372 on: July 19, 2012, 11:27:PM »
I was! Haha. On the other forum about 2 weeks ago Steph said she had proof I was Kevin, I had no idea who the hell he was.
So then John started to believe it - so I was like "Someone can call me if they want to so that we can put this behind us" John chose to, we spoke about 5 minutes and he told Steph that I wasn't Kevin and she apologised.

Now I'm someone else.  :o

Yeah, you're me. Enjoy :)
....just cos I eat worms...

Neil

  • Guest
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #373 on: July 19, 2012, 11:30:PM »
I was! Haha. On the other forum about 2 weeks ago Steph said she had proof I was Kevin, I had no idea who the hell he was.
So then John started to believe it - so I was like "Someone can call me if they want to so that we can put this behind us" John chose to, we spoke about 5 minutes and he told Steph that I wasn't Kevin and she apologised.

Now I'm someone else.  :o
;D

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Congratulations
« Reply #374 on: July 19, 2012, 11:32:PM »
I think you missed me off the list.  ???  ;D

Personally I don't think the touchy feely approach is working, why do some members have to tread on egg shells, yet others have free reign to goad, be rude and antagonistic with every post?

I know your views on the case and you know mine, yet we can still get along, I'd also bet my bottom dollar that you would agree with me when I say that Grahames recent activity is disruptive and uncalled for, he's making a fool of himself. Likewise I'm sure you would agree that old Jefferey has or had another user name and she has been less than polite with every post she's made.

I think either action needs to taken against these disruptive people, regardless of their views, or we all need to accept that this is normal and acceptable.

Maybe I'm putting you on the spot and perhaps that's wrong.

My opinion about grahame is that he's at his very best when posting about the case and that many of his case related posts are quality.  It would make my job much easier if he stuck to the case.  However, it's not beyond your ability to sail close to the wind also, on occasion... hence your absence from the above list  ;D

What you seem to be saying is that I should take more firm action against disruptive agenda driven posting, whether it is from a newbie or a regular.  Is that correct?