Sheila attempted to commit suicide (but failed), and was shot by the police...

[mike tesko]

Anthony Pargeters .22 bolt action rifle had its own parker hale silencer attached to its barrel, which was normally kept in the downstairs toilet at whf, and a second silencer belonging to the Bamber anshulz rifle which was normally kept in the gun cupboard in the downstairs office?

Ex cop Jones found Pargeters silencer and took it away from the scene on 7th August 1985, this was / is the silencer which was given the original exhibit mark of SBJ/1. Then on evening of 12th August 1985, Peter Eaton handed to ex cop Jones, the Bamber silencer which Boutflour found in the gun cupboard....

Anyone who tries to pretend that both of these silencers were / are the same silencer is bonkers...

Everybody for the past 27 years or more has been pretending that there was only one silencer, and no-one has bothered to enquire what happened to Pargetersw identical looking silencer? It's as if they did not want the Pargeter silencer to exist. But it does, and it did...

[mike tesko]

Anthony Pargeters .22 bolt action rifle had its own parker hale silencer attached to its barrel, which was normally kept in the downstairs toilet at whf, and a second silencer belonging to the Bamber anshulz rifle which was normally kept in the gun cupboard in the downstairs office?

Ex cop Jones found Pargeters silencer and took it away from the scene on 7th August 1985, this was / is the silencer which was given the original exhibit mark of SBJ/1. Then on evening of 12th August 1985, Peter Eaton handed to ex cop Jones, the Bamber silencer which Boutflour found in the gun cupboard....

Anyone who tries to pretend that both of these silencers were / are the same silencer is bonkers...

Everybody for the past 27 years or more has been pretending that there was only one silencer, and no-one has bothered to enquire what happened to Pargetersw identical looking silencer? It's as if they did not want the Pargeter silencer to exist. But it does, and it did...

Step back for one minute and ask yourselves why none of the relatives appeared concerned over the identity of the silencer they found in the gun cupboard (when ever they found it)?

Did Robert Boutflour ever once enquire of this silencer - to whom does it belong?
Did David Boutflour ever once enquire of this silencer - to whom does it belong?
Did Ann Eaton ever once enquire of this silencer - to whom does it belong?
Did Peter Eaton ever once enquire of this silencer - to whom does it belong?
Did Anthony Pargeter ever once enquire of this silencer - to whom does it belong?
Did ex cop DS Jones ever once enquire of this silencer - to whom does it belong?
Did PI "Bob" Miller ever once enquire of this silencer - to whom does it belong?
Did DI "Ron" Cook ever once enquire of this silencer - to whom does it belong?
Did DCS "Mick" Ainsley ever once enquire - to who does it belong?
Did the DPP ever once enquire - to whom does it belong?
Did the trial judge Mr Justice Drake ever once enquire - to whom does it belong?
Did the court of appeal in 2002 ever once enquire - to whom does it belong?
Did the CCRC ever once enquire of the silencer - to whom does it belong?
Fact is, all these people didn't want it to be anybody else's silencer, they wanted it to be the Bamber silencer, how dare it be found in the gun cupboard where it was normally kept?

[mike tesko]

One thing is for sure, and that is that if ex cop Jones found a silencer at the scene on 7th August 1985 (SBJ/1) and he took it away, and its details were entered into the original property register, it could not be the very same silencer found in the gun cupboard by Boutflour on 10th August 1985....

[mike tesko]

One thing is for sure, and that is that if ex cop Jones found a silencer at the scene on 7th August 1985 (SBJ/1) and he took it away, and its details were entered into the original property register, it could not be the very same silencer found in the gun cupboard by Boutflour on 10th August 1985....

Ex crooked cop Jones, could not have been handed the very same silencer (SBJ/1) he found at the scene on 7th August 1985, by Peter Eaton on the evening of 12th August 1985, because Jones already had seized that silencer (SBJ/1) along with three other exhibits on 7th August 1985...

[mike tesko]

Is it just a coincidence that ex crooked cop Jones had direct dealings with both of the silencers which were normally to be found at the scene, and that he played a significant riole in helping to merge both of these silencers into the very same one by the time the case came to trial in October 1986?

[sammy]

Is it just a coincidence that ex crooked cop Jones had direct dealings with both of the silencers which were normally to be found at the scene, and that he played a significant riole in helping to merge both of these silencers into the very same one by the time the case came to trial in October 1986?

Your out of order there mate.

[mike tesko]

Your out of order there mate.

Same crooked ex copper who falsified his pocketbook entries months after it was first issued to him against regulation. The contents of this doctored pocketbook entry, were counter signed by another crooked ex cop PI "Bob" Miller, who must have known that Jones had re-written the notes relating to the investigation at whf, several months later? Ex copper Jones, had three different start dates on the front cover of his pocketbook which contained his evidence as per whf, the handing over of the second silencer by Peter Eaton, and his watered down involvement with Mugford. I'll show you how out of order I am when I post all end everything ex copper Jones got up to, and why he should have been charged' convicted and imprisoned for falsifying evidence that was used to prosecute Bamber for these murders that he did not commit...

Lets start right at the beginning - ex copper Jones, needs to explain and identify the four exhibits he took from the scene on 7th August 1985. A good place to start would be to go to one of the daily tabloids, or appear on TV and tell the world what exhibits he found and took possession of long before Peter Eaton handed over the second silencer to him on the evening of 12th August 1985. I will be waiting with interest to see what materializes. I doubt that the crook will have the balls to tell the truth...

[mike tesko]

Same crooked ex copper who falsified his pocketbook entries months after it was first issued to him against regulation. The contents of this doctored pocketbook entry, were counter signed by another crooked ex cop PI "Bob" Miller, who must have known that Jones had re-written the notes relating to the investigation at whf, several months later? Ex copper Jones, had three different start dates on the front cover of his pocketbook which contained his evidence as per whf, the handing over of the second silencer by Peter Eaton, and his watered down involvement with Mugford. I'll show you how out of order I am when I post all end everything ex copper Jones got up to, and why he should have been charged' convicted and imprisoned for falsifying evidence that was used to prosecute Bamber for these murders that he did not commit...

Lets start right at the beginning - ex copper Jones, needs to explain and identify the four exhibits he took from the scene on 7th August 1985. A good place to start would be to go to one of the daily tabloids, or appear on TV and tell the world what exhibits he found and took possession of long before Peter Eaton handed over the second silencer to him on the evening of 12th August 1985. I will be waiting with interest to see what materializes. I doubt that the crook will have the balls to tell the truth...

If anyone knows this crook, please let him know we know about the four exhibits he took possession of from the scene, on morning of 7th August 1985 (whilst bodies of victims were still in  situ and being abused by officers carrying out a training exercise) under the identifying marks of SBJ/1 (silencer), SBJ/2, SBJ/3 and SBJ/4...

Out of order mate...

So you must think that its ok for a crooked cop to falsify a bit of evidence here and there? Jones is basically a crooked bastard, and a lying cunt, and he has got away with falsifying evidence for nigh on 27 years, and it is now time to set the record straight. If I have got anything at all to do with it, he ain't going to be getting away with it for much longer...

[mike tesko]

If anyone knows this crook, please let him know we know about the four exhibits he took possession of from the scene, on morning of 7th August 1985 (whilst bodies of victims were still in  situ and being abused by officers carrying out a training exercise) under the identifying marks of SBJ/1 (silencer), SBJ/2, SBJ/3 and SBJ/4...

Out of order mate...

I'll fucking give you and him out of fucking order - so you must think that its ok for a crooked cop to falsify a bit of evidence here and there? Jones is basically a crooked bastard, and a lying cunt, and he has got away with falsifying evidence for nigh on 27 years, and it is now time to set the record straight. If I have got anything at all to do with it, he ain't going to be getting away with it for much longer...

Get the bastard to take me to court and we will have it out in a court battle - I can't stand bent coppers...

[mike tesko]

I suppose crooked ex cop Jones, didn't know anything at all about the small flake of dried blood that Boutflour scraped off the end of one of the silencers using a razor blade? Well, he did and guess what happened to that flake?

[mike tesko]

I suppose crooked ex cop Jones, didn't know anything at all about the small flake of dried blood that Boutflour scraped off the end of one of the silencers using a razor blade? Well, he did and guess what happened to that flake?

There are no prizes for guessing the right answer...

[mike tesko]

Why wasn't ex crooked cop Jones looking into why police stage managed Sheila's body in the bedroom?
Why wasn't he looking into why PC Bird falsified a photographed record so that 358 photographs could be taken out of the equation at the stroke of a pen? Why doesn't he simply make a statement saying and identifying the exhibit (SBJ/1) he took from the scene on the morning 7th August 1985, which supposedly clashed with references given to the silencer elsewhere under DB/1 and DRB/1?

Come on (Jones) - just tell us what your SBJ/1 exhibit was?

(it was the original silencer, that is what it was, nothing more and nothing less), and Jones had it long before Boutflour found the other one in the gun cupboard - Bamber and his legal team had a right to know about these two silencers, and so did the court which tried him, and the appeal which turned its back on him...

[mike tesko]

The role ex cop Jones played in this investigation and his involvement with mighty mouth Mugford, renders their joint evidence as a piece of worthless shit. They both lied and both had the same common purpose in mind, which was to put Bamber away because both by that stage disliked Bamber for one reason or another...

[mike tesko]

How come the photograph ex cop Jones took of the downstairs toilet at whf never found it way into the wrongly named MASTER COPY ALBUM containing all of 223 pictures, as presented by PC Bird? How could such a photographs be missing from such an album, and the police be treating it as a master copy album when it and another 357 photographs had also been omitted?

It's a fucking joke...

They acted and behaved like common criminals, the lot of them...

[maggie]

The role ex cop Jones played in this investigation and his involvement with mighty mouth Mugford, renders their joint evidence as a piece of worthless shit. They both lied and both had the same common purpose in mind, which was to put Bamber away because both by that stage disliked Bamber for one reason or another...

Mike I think it seemed apparent that jones didnt like Jeremys public school background. The fact he was a 'posh' boy seemed to annoy jones.imho