The very best of luck to Jeremy

[guest154]

Jackie? What the hell?

LEAVE ME ALONE.

[G]

Am I wrong in thinking that there was a business line and a home line at WHF? Neville called from the home line didn't he?


Anyone who remembers, will know you could trace calls and have itemised billing in 1985! You could have it in the 70's.

I believe it has been discussed before on the forum and it was discovered that itemised biloing was not introduced in the UK until 1986?

[guest154]

I believe it has been discussed before on the forum and it was discovered that itemised biloing was not introduced in the UK until 1986?

Is that for home phone lines though? Businesses have had it since the early seventies. Telephone boxes even earlier.

[simong]

I cannot believe a person without any of these traits could possibly carry out this crime and then coolly meet the police at WHF later that night and to me that is the crux. 

I believe this is an excellent point. This is my main doubt about JB actually carrying out the murders. You kill 5 people, 3 of which you have known since childhood. All of them have suffered head shots. This would have been pretty graphic. It would have had immediate, short and long term psychological effect on the perpetrator. From what i have read from the officers statements, JB certainly doesn't act like he has killed 5 people in the last few hours.

[G]

Is that for home phone lines though? Businesses have had it since the early seventies. Telephone boxes even earlier.

I'm not sure? I know it was discussed extensively? Because Mike stated that there was an itemised bill for White House Farm. But Hartley and someone else (whose name escapes me) said that itemised biloing in this country wasn't introduced in this country and then in only some main exchanges and Tolleshunt D'Arcy didn't have the facility at that time in 1985? I think that's how the argument ran anyway?

[JackiePreece]

« Sent to: JackiePreece on: Today at 12:22 AM » ReplyQuoteDelete


If you don't back off, I'm going to report you to people who can make your silly life hell.



There are reasons you sent out 23 private messages last month but only got 4 replies. You're a mad woman who people don't deal with.

I can see what I want  - as you can tell by the pirvate message thing - don't annoy me.


Who do you think you are a gangster

[guest154]

I'm not sure? I know it was discussed extensively? Because Mike stated that there was an itemised bill for White House Farm. But Hartley and someone else (whose name escapes me) said that itemised biloing in this country wasn't introduced in this country and then in only some main exchanges and Tolleshunt D'Arcy didn't have the facility at that time in 1985? I think that's how the argument ran anyway?

It must be for home phone lines that they didn't have it (although even for home phone lines 1985 seems far too late for me, it's ringing alarm bells) but yeah businesses and phone boxes for sure.
Mike said that WHF had it? Must have had a business line then would be my assumption if he was sure it had it.

[Patti]

I believe it has been discussed before on the forum and it was discovered that itemised biloing was not introduced in the UK until 1986?

Is biloing, Australian for Fosters....hahahahaha

Sorry G.....

[simong]

I believe it has been discussed before on the forum and it was discovered that itemised biloing was not introduced in the UK until 1986?

I am sure Mike has posted up an itemised bill for the business line from WHF from October 1985. Itemised billing was not available for a home line though. By the way it was me, not Hartley that banged on about it, being called a liar several times by several people in the process. I'm not bitter though 

[guest154]

Simon- to clarify, I was right when I said that certianly in 1985 itemised billing would be available for a business?

[G]

I am sure Mike has posted up an itemised bill for the business line from WHF from October 1985. Itemised billing was not available for a home line though. By the way it was me, not Hartley that banged on about it, being called a liar several times by several people in the process. I'm not bitter though 

Oh right sorry 'bout that. But if I remember correctly Mike insisted that there was an itemised bill for WHF which would show if Jeremy got a call from his father that night and he was told that there wasn't one and that they weren't indroduced until 1985 and doubt was cast upon Mike and his honesty if what I remember is correct?

[simong]

Simon- to clarify, I was right when I said that certianly in 1985 itemised billing would be available for a business?

To the best of my knowledge, yes.

[simong]

Oh right sorry 'bout that. But if I remember correctly Mike insisted that there was an itemised bill for WHF which would show if Jeremy got a call from his father that night and he was told that there wasn't one and that they weren't indroduced until 1985 and doubt was cast upon Mike and his honesty if what I remember is correct?

That's ok, Here is a link to the history of the telephone. http://www.britishtelephones.com/histuk.htm

[guest154]

Thanks for the help simon and G!
I knew the information I was told about the phone call Mugford made was indeed correct and traced - doubters on here had to try and make it out like it couldn't have happend tho.

[G]

Here is the thread where it was discussed.
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,2335.0.html