They wanted to hear what she had to say. She didn't have to say what she did, she wasn't coerced.
So either all the essex police were lying, the raid teams, coroners, julie, most of the bamber family & there are still coverups to this day .. so that's courts, witnesses, anyone with the PII material.
Or
Jeremy Bamber is a liar.
And Rochford.
She did come forward. Suspicion was already falling on Jeremy Bamber (at least I've been told this by an offcier but he may be saying that suspicion was already falling on bamber because he's embaressed it wasn't) but then she came forward with a phone call at first.
She withheld her name/information.
But it was traced back to her, and then the fight began to get to the truth.
So on the morning of 7th Aug Julie was collected by police from her house in south London, then waited to be transferred to an Essex police car en route to be taken to Goldhanger and all that time she was as 'cool as a cucumber' not letting on that she
knew her boyfriend had murdered his family even though a couple of hours earlier she had told him to go back to sleep!
She wasn't coerced? Doesn't not charging her with theft and burglary smack of coercion, nevermind the 25K she earned from NOW during the trial?
She withheld her name and information did she? Well, that's new, we've always been led to believe it was her mate (Battersby?) who phoned the police on Julie's behalf, now you've told us something different, which also contradicts you saying she did come forward!