Author Topic: Hearing New Evidence  (Read 7303 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #105 on: March 16, 2025, 06:55:PM »
You beat me to it. I thought Adam would love that as new profile pic.
Technology can accomplish wonders these days.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #106 on: March 16, 2025, 07:17:PM »
Guest29835 says Bamber stole June's bike for reconnaisance. Although did not say what the reconnaissance was supposed to be.

The defence wisely did not magnify the numerous advantages of cycling.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #107 on: March 16, 2025, 07:17:PM »
Since 1986 the CT have just said -

Wilkinson cycled in daylight.

There would be insects on the ground.

It was in the open so good vision & he could be seen.

Wilkinson was not the same size as Bamber.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2025, 07:19:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4829
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #108 on: March 16, 2025, 07:40:PM »
Absolute proof that Jeremy used a bike and wore a wet-suit! - a recently discovered photo which a witness took of him when she was walking along the seawall in the early hours of 7th. August 1985 -

https://thedocmaker.substack.com/p/occams-razor?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Or is it?  ::)

Looks like a fake photo to me? Do you know when it was taken seeing as you are claiming it it is proof etc?

Sorry you said on the 7th August so definitely a fake.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2025, 07:43:PM by Rob_ »

Offline Curiosity

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #109 on: March 16, 2025, 07:54:PM »
Looks like a fake photo to me? Do you know when it was taken seeing as you are claiming it it is proof etc?

Sorry you said on the 7th August so definitely a fake.
Technology can accomplish wonders these days.
And even bring long-deceased Kings of England back to life -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbH_KLMs6aY&ab_channel=FaceLabLJMU
I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and furballs.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #110 on: March 17, 2025, 01:32:AM »
Forgot to say Phillip said he may have got a puncture.

I can recall getting 4 punctures since getting my first bike at 7. So Bamber would be very unlucky if he got one.

If he did get a puncture, he could abort if on the way to WHF. Or would have to walk the remainder of the way back to GH if the massacre had been committed.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2025, 01:33:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #111 on: March 17, 2025, 02:09:AM »
It is 2.4 miles to WHF. If walking in a straight line across fields. From the back of 9, Head Street. 

He will have to walk across 13 fields.

Wilkinson said it was not possible to do this.

Some of the dividers between fields would be hedges, fences, dips, streams. Or a combination of these.

So a lot of zig zagging increasing the journey to 3+ miles.

Some of the fields would be tough terrain to walk across. 

So a lot of time consuming hard work.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2025, 03:58:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #112 on: March 17, 2025, 02:20:AM »
Jeremy would know the fields between WHF & GH better than anyone.

Seems he decided a long time beforehand to cycle. Telling Julie in June 85 he planned to cycle.

Don't blame him.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2025, 03:02:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13160
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #113 on: March 17, 2025, 09:17:AM »
Jeremy would know the fields between WHF & GH better than anyone.

He denies doing so. He was never questioned about it at trial.

Suppose he may have walked Brambles on the fields from time to time.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13160
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #114 on: March 17, 2025, 09:23:AM »
It is 2.4 miles to WHF. If walking in a straight line across fields. From the back of 9, Head Street. 

He will have to walk across 13 fields.

Wilkinson said it was not possible to do this.

Some of the dividers between fields would be hedges, fences, dips, streams. Or a combination of these.

So a lot of zig zagging increasing the journey to 3+ miles.

Some of the fields would be tough terrain to walk across. 

So a lot of time consuming hard work.

He could just walk the road way.

Not that I believe he did. I think he just bombed it in the motor.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2025, 09:23:AM by ILB »
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13160
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #115 on: March 17, 2025, 09:25:AM »
Whether he chose to park on Pages Lane and walk down or drive directly up to WHF is a matter for him.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13160
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #116 on: March 17, 2025, 09:27:AM »
What the f?????
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #117 on: March 17, 2025, 11:24:AM »
He could just walk the road way.

Not that I believe he did. I think he just bombed it in the motor.

He could cycle that route. As CAL says he did.

As you said, it is roads.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2025, 11:31:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #118 on: March 17, 2025, 11:29:AM »
He denies doing so. He was never questioned about it at trial.

Suppose he may have walked Brambles on the fields from time to time.

He worked in the fields.

There are not many other farms between Head Street & WHF. Assume WHF covered a lot of these fields.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13160
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #119 on: March 17, 2025, 02:08:PM »
He could cycle that route. As CAL says he did.

As you said, it is roads.

If someone clocks him cycling it's too crystal clear the possibility of an ID.

A car going past is a car, not a visual ID.

No one will remember the reg number as nobody would have any inkling the car was on its way to committ crimes.

Bike is much riskier in this regard

He was well known in the area, prominent family.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2025, 02:10:PM by ILB »
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me