Truth serum

[Cambridgecutie]

It may be a case that she believed  what she was posting, but has an ulterior motive for being a supporter.

I look forward to her new theories.

She has recently said what Bamber says can't be trusted. If she retracts on this she will have to agree he had an AM. She refused to accept that even as a pretend guilter!

Can't be trusted doesn't necessarily mean he is knowingly attempting to deceive.  Can't be trusted includes facts like he has been incarcerated for nearly 40 years and does not have access to the outisde world and the sort of means you and I have access to.

I refuse to accept he had an AM pre murders because there's no evidence he had one.  And as I said I don't take any notice what Bamber/supporters say. 

[Cambridgecutie]

I don't recall you telling me by PM or any other method. I knew you were playing a game.

I will try and find the PM.  It wasn't a game.  I was on a secondment. 

[Cambridgecutie]

Asif someone using a photo of themselves holding a mostly empty bottle of Cambridge dry gin with a big creepy grin on their face as their forum avatar would make things up and play games.

The mostly empty bottle of Cambridge dry gin you refer to remains to this day unopened. 

[Cambridgecutie]

She has given conflicting explanations for why in PMs to other members on here. So its unlikely you'd ever get an honest answer.

Who gives a flying fig?  How important is it to anyone/thing in the grand scheme of things?

[Cambridgecutie]

She either believed in what she was posting when posting as a guilter. So not sure how she still finds him innocent.

Or didn't believe in what she was posting.  In which case why post it?

A very strange 4 years.

It isn't strange at all.  I wanted to experience what it is like on the other side.  Also since I don't believe in much of what Bamber and his supporters put out there it really wasn't difficult.

[Cambridgecutie]

You do make some very good posts CC.  You have a knowledge of the science involved in the case which is probably better than anyone here. You have researched it thoroughly.  I just think it is unfortunate that you have wound up some members.  I do understand the joke but I feel at times it has gone too far.

Thanks, but only here? 

But it is necessary to try and understand the prosecution case.

[Cambridgecutie]

It has been claimed that the person now being judged is accused of giving "conflicting explanations for why in PMs to other members here" There is irony in in the following claim that "it's unlikely you'd ever get an honest answer". One has to wonder how it may be possible for a member to know what PMs are being sent to other members and/or how may the integrity of the poster revealing such be trusted given the obvious 'history' they have. Might there be something here about a bruised ego? Might there be a warning here to posters to think twice about who they send PMs to?

This certainly isn't the first time the forum has been 'duped'. It's unlikely to be the last. It's standard practice where big egos congregate and they try to outdo each other. It's of no moment whether or not person A is telling the truth. They'll very likely be accused of lying if they are.

At the end of the day, I don't think this person's status as either detractor or supporter is important.Good posts will always be worth reading. It would be arrogant to believe that the contents of this forum will provide the means to JB's release, but it does provide an interest for its members on both sides of the argument.

I agree.  No one has sworn an oath or anything.  Why not just take the content of the post and attempt to learn something from it. 

[Cambridgecutie]

I think people get too concerned over what other people believe and that becomes the debate rather than the actual case. It doesn't really matter what someone else thinks, as long as you're sure in your own mind about your own thoughts, even if that means you're innocent, guilty or on the fence.

Totally agree.

[Cambridgecutie]

This isn't the best truth serum.. but it's all I have tonight. Plus some Talisker.

I've recently sampled Lost by Brewdog.  A nice sessionable beer 

[ILB]

Can't be trusted doesn't necessarily mean he is knowingly attempting to deceive.  Can't be trusted includes facts like he has been incarcerated for nearly 40 years and does not have access to the outisde world and the sort of means you and I have access to.

I refuse to accept he had an AM pre murders because there's no evidence he had one.  And as I said I don't take any notice what Bamber/supporters say.

How can you refuse to accept he had one when he himself admits he had one?

Why would he lie about it?

[Adam]

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,11457.msg530123.html#msg530123

Here is 33 reasons why he had an AM pre massacre.

Jeremy himself has also said he had one via the Justice4Jeremy team.

No surprise, AM's were common in 1985.

[ILB]

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,11457.msg530123.html#msg530123

Here is 33 reasons why he had an AM pre massacre.

Jeremy himself has also said he had one via the Justice4Jeremy team.

No surprise, AM's were common in 1985.

Jeremy Bamber himself saying he had one is the only thing you need.

[Adam]

Jeremy Bamber himself saying he had one is the only thing you need.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,12109.msg557610.html#msg557610

The 33 reasons were strong.

Posted before I found the Justice4Jeremy video.

[David1819]

How can you refuse to accept he had one when he himself admits he had one?

Why would he lie about it?

ILB were has JB said this?

[Cambridgecutie]

How can you refuse to accept he had one when he himself admits he had one?

Why would he lie about it?

Are we talking pre murders or post murders?

I refuse to accept he had one pre murders because DS Jones interrogated him over the phones and made no mention of an AM.  Also the WS's of others talk about the phones extensively and no one makes any ref to an AM. 

Anyway its irrelevant.