Emma Morris

[ILB]

Then you would be totally wrong!  I am NOT Holly, Cambridge, KE, or anyone else on this forum. Furthermore as a teetotaller/abstainer I prefer to keep my brain from becoming befuddled and my liver in good nick.

Alright

[Roch]

I'm sorry you've been put in a position of having to explain yourself.

I can empathise with you after having been accused of being another poster or posters myself, elsewhere . In my opinion the problem here is not with David or ILB.  The accusations levelled at you are the direct result of another member having used different profiles themself.  It creates suspicion. 

[Hardy Boy]

I can empathise with you after having been accused of being another poster or posters myself, elsewhere . In my opinion the problem here is not with David or ILB.  The accusations levelled at you are the direct result of another member having used different profiles themself.  It creates suspicion.

I don't agree with you one bit Roch, it's happened before Holly and will continue to happen, there is a moderation team to go through,  yet he's straight in with his PISSHEAD accusations,  the guy has a problem and your now feeding it in my view with this statement.

[Roch]

I don't agree with you one bit Roch, it's happened before Holly and will continue to happen, there is a moderation team to go through,  yet he's straight in with his PISSHEAD accusations,  the guy has a problem and your now feeding it in my view with this statement.

I've never condoned David's 'piss head' comments.  However, I feel that is not the main issue here.  The main issue is that there is a forum member who likes to play games with multiple profiles, for their own amusement. This in turn creates suspicion among other members.  I can't be any plainer than that.

However, I will start moderating posts if they contain such language.

[Hardy Boy]

I've never condoned David's 'piss head' comments.  However, I feel that is not the main issue here.  The main issue is that there is a forum member who likes to play games with multiple profiles, for their own amusement. This in turn creates suspicion among other members.  I can't be any plainer than that.

So any new member will have to pass the "I'm not Holly Test then"  or suffer abuse.  i like the way the forum is run and the way you let Banter go, But when someone introduces themselves in the Foyer and get likened to some pisshead off red, surely it can be off putting to any new member wanting to join?

[Hardy Boy]

I've never condoned David's 'piss head' comments.  However, I feel that is not the main issue here.  The main issue is that there is a forum member who likes to play games with multiple profiles, for their own amusement. This in turn creates suspicion among other members.  I can't be any plainer than that.

However, I will start moderating posts if they contain such language.

Sorry Roch you put this in after i had finished what i was writing,  same as i say, i like the way you Mod and let things go, i think it is very off putting for someone introdcing themselves in the Foyer though.  Holly might have a problem, i don't know, i don't think she has anyway and i don't think she deserves it thrown at her everytime,  it might be the case why she changes character who knows deep down,  she might want to change character because she now feels Bamber Guilty and  she will be ridiculed the same as Caroline and Jane was,  the worst thing you can do on here is be open about yourself at times.

[Bubo bubo]

So any new member will have to pass the "I'm not Holly Test then"  or suffer abuse.  i like the way the forum is run and the way you let Banter go, But when someone introduces themselves in the Foyer and get likened to some pisshead off red, surely it can be off putting to any new member wanting to join?

The same goes when members posts are continually described as Bull Shit and told they should be in a Loony Bin. You have not got a brain. Seriously what utter clap trap.

I am afraid you are a good example of an online bully. You posts contain too much swearing and suggest you perhaps should consider your own posting style before having a go at others.

You do not like my views and seek to denigrate my position on a regular basis not by facts but screeds of invective.;

[Hardy Boy]

The same goes when members posts are continually described as Bull Shit and told they should be in a Loony Bin. You have not got a brain. Seriously what utter clap trap.

I am afraid you are a good example of an online bully. You posts contain too much swearing and suggest you perhaps should consider your own posting style before having a go at others.

You do not like my views and seek to denigrate my position on a regular basis not by facts but screeds of invective.;

I responded very kindly to your post when you said "Your statement above is 'bollocks" 

[Hardy Boy]

Again you start straight away with abuse.......................You have not got a brain. Seriously what utter clap trap.

[Jane]

The same goes when members posts are continually described as Bull Shit and told they should be in a Loony Bin. You have not got a brain. Seriously what utter clap trap.

I am afraid you are a good example of an online bully. You posts contain too much swearing and suggest you perhaps should consider your own posting style before having a go at others.

You do not like my views and seek to denigrate my position on a regular basis not by facts but screeds of invective.;

I'd have said you're describing yourself to a tee.

[Hardy Boy]

I'd have said you're describing yourself to a tee.

Bubo called my statement Bollocks, yet doesn't like it when i say his is Bullshit?  I call it tit for tat, yet Curiosity introduces himself and gets likened to a Pisshead from red?

[Bubo bubo]

I responded very kindly to your post when you said "Your statement above is 'bollocks"

I was returning the favour.

Well first i don't know if your a man or a woman and second by saying THEIR i mean belonging to.   Any ideas you put out there,  you have to own them or say it's the usual BUBO  LOCKS

The original post by you was indicating that all my posts were bollocks using word play

You have now selected only part of my response to wriggle out of your position. This is what I posted in full as a response..

I do not know how he was positioned before he was moved. I merely suggested the foetal position based on historical information gained from WW1 given the agony he would have endured from all of his injuries.

Even if we do not know exactly his true position it is clear from the experiment that it only requires his upper back to be in contact irrespective of how the rest of his body is positioned. Further we do not know whether he was trapped/pinned in some way by furniture.

Your statement above is 'bollocks'. I know you like that word. Lets take an inanimate object like a piece of wood which is heavier at one end than the other. You are arguing against the laws of physics. The plank of wood would drop to the ground at the heavier end. That is the law of gravity and the human body whether alive or dead and in rigor would follow this rule.  Even a seesaw which is equally balanced when additional weight is applied to one end that it falls to the ground.

He was obviously not sitting in the chair that he straddles. If he tipped forward from a seated position the back of the chair would be across/over his back. The chair is on its side.

Here is a simple test you can do yourself at home. Turn a chair on its side. Then lay down over the chair with one leg either side and your lower body supported by the back of the chair. You will find that your legs do not bend at the knees the way NB's are shown and your head falls to the ground. He must have been in rigor at another location for him to be in such a configuration.

These facts show why his head had to be supported by the scuttle.

It is not incumbent on PB to give reasons for his movement and you will notice that he does not attribute that to the police. He just says the body must have been moved

[Bubo bubo]

Bubo called my statement Bollocks, yet doesn't like it when i say his is Bullshit?  I call it tit for tat, yet Curiosity introduces himself and gets likened to a Pisshead from red?

Not by me sunshine. If you look carefully I tend only reply in kind when it is instigated by others. I am rarely the driver of foul mouthed rants.

Again you talk utter Bullshit, he say's that" there's a possibility that Neville Bambers Body was actually physically moved after the POLICE arrived at the scene and the evidence was changed for want of a better word".  You lie after lie with your utter Bullshit.  I said that they don't need supporting when in full rigor because you posted this,  He had been moved because otherwise gravity would have determined his positioning,  [i simply don't know what you mean, he had been moved because of gravity]  i don't need your bullshit education on the Laws of Physics thank you, your bullshit about the police shooting June and then moving Neville to access the fire box is enough Comedy for today.

If the position of the dead body during the primary relaxation is unusual with flexion at some major joints, it will remain rigidly in the same position during the stage of rigor mortis. If the rigor mortis is the well established stage, the flexed limbs continue to stay flexed and will defy gravity, even when the support beneath them is missing.

[Hardy Boy]

Not by me sunshine. If you look carefully I tend only reply in kind when it is instigated by others. I am rarely the driver of foul mouthed rants.

Did i say you did fruitcake.  Your attack on me is because i defended Curiosity.

[Bubo bubo]

Should be easy for you to work out Jane,  what are you finding hard to understand,  can you go back and work on the x and y principle for us?  Rob has explained things a lot better this time for you.

{\displaystyle {\sqrt {1+x}}=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\frac {(-1)^{n}(2n)!}{(1-2n)(n!)^{2}(4^{n})}}x^{n}=1+{\frac {1}{2}}x-{\frac {1}{8}}x^{2}+{\frac {1}{16}}x^{3}-{\frac {5}{128}}x^{4}+\cdots ,}

I also found this put down masquerading as humour distasteful. Rob was trying to explain a complex issue without diagrams and all you did was mock in your bullying posting style.