Author Topic: Emma Morris  (Read 45235 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #390 on: July 16, 2024, 05:57:PM »
Trust you to lower the tone of discussion. PPE was not used at that time I believe. It was before DNA testing which gave rise to SOCO uniforms.


When you've finished goading -or were you joking perhaps, like you were when you corrected HB's spelling?- it would be lovely if normal service can resume without comments about tones being lowered?

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #391 on: July 16, 2024, 06:05:PM »

When you've finished goading -or were you joking perhaps, like you were when you corrected HB's spelling?- it would be lovely if normal service can resume without comments about tones being lowered?
I have explained my reason for the HB spelling mistake. See post 387. It was you who made a silly/childish comment which was completely unnecessary. You could have suggested they wore protective clothing. That would have been more appropriate but you sought to belittle my suggestion with stupid remark and you know it.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2024, 06:06:PM by Bubo bubo »

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #392 on: July 16, 2024, 06:07:PM »
That was a suggestion from RB in relation to JB as the perpetrator. It was found at Goldhanger and not used as evidence. Have you ridden a bike in a wetsuit?
No, not yet, but i might have to when i go to Cornwall this year?

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #393 on: July 16, 2024, 06:09:PM »
No, not yet, but i might have to when i go to Cornwall this year?

Let us know what it is like if you do. It will contribute to the debate in one small way.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2024, 06:10:PM by Bubo bubo »

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #394 on: July 16, 2024, 06:15:PM »
I do not generally play spelling policeman but thought it funny but at the same time perfectly understandable.
It's not the first time you have Corrected my Grammer though is it Bubo,  and i don't see you do it to anyone else. 

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #395 on: July 16, 2024, 06:28:PM »
I have explained my reason for the HB spelling mistake. See post 387. It was you who made a silly/childish comment which was completely unnecessary. You could have suggested they wore protective clothing. That would have been more appropriate but you sought to belittle my suggestion with stupid remark and you know it.


How silly of me. I'd believed the white coveralls to be protective clothing, which is why I mentioned it.

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #396 on: July 16, 2024, 06:41:PM »
I am unsure because I do not have evidence as to the detail of the submission. Do they have other scientists who have peer reviewed PB's work and do they agree. If this is the case it will carry more weight. Further it is clear from the wording from the CT that they have a number of issues which also suggest crime scene manipulation and whilst we can only hazard a guess as to what these maybe if there are multiple examples that too would strengthen the crime scene manipulation argument.

Issue 3 – The integrity of the scene – Detailed grounds including fresh evidence regarding the police interference with the scene and the exhibits.

 Notice the plural
Anyway, back to Discussion, why do you think the Police Put Neville's head in the Coal Scuttle when they moved him Bubo?

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #397 on: July 16, 2024, 07:11:PM »
Anyway, back to Discussion, why do you think the Police Put Neville's head in the Coal Scuttle when they moved him Bubo?

I spelled this out just 12 days ago in response to your post.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,11621.msg564306.html#msg564306

He was not on a stool he was balanced on the side of an upturned chair.

Here is part of an earlier post. I find the position of NB's head falling exactly on the scuttle improbable.

Of course there are other reasons for moving him e.g. to assist with death certification but perhaps more importantly to gain access to the fire box in the Aga to burn items (DB2 fire debris) However, these issues required him to be put in another position. Or did the long shot come up?

The problem is the margins for the final positioning are quite fine, with centimetres one way or another determining the final outcome. A small difference would mean he would miss the scuttle possibly even toppling it and we know he had no injuries to suggest his head/face hit the top of the scuttle with any force. Maybe some physicist could calculate the likelihood of such odds?

Neville looks as if he was in full rigor and the scuttle may have been required to ensure he was suitably balanced. The heat from the AGA would have speeded up the process of rigor mortis.

If this were the case, then if he was not supported his head would be touching the ground and his frozen leg position would mean the bottom of his feet would be facing upwards. He had been moved because otherwise gravity would have determined his positioning. The top half of his body would be heavier than the lower part. In these circumstances it would be obvious he had been moved. The middle of his body would be the fulcrum and he would be like a seesaw with one end heavier than the other.

Moving him would also facilitate the counting of how many times he had been shot. IMO the TFG burned evidence of their clean-up operation particularly any bloodied items in the Aga. For example, protective items as outlined in the fire debris contents. I doubt the jeans and what looks like a white towel, were the only materials used? Were they moved from the cushions so that the nursing scene was dismantled?

The coal scuttle appears to be on top of the jeans in the pictures I have seen.
When the police/SOCO started their cover-up the focus would be on trying to piece together, a scenario which had some semblance of reality as far as was possible and in as great a detail they could achieve. For this reason, I do not discount them firing additional shots to NB’s head to give credence to the fact that he had not been moved.

If Neville was moved this could have given rise to another problem. If as now seems more likely he had been burnt by the Aga on his back say by the drain tap (now identified by Boyce as parts of the firebox door), while being attacked or during the process of being moved, how he obtained these marks would be questioned since it would not be possible if he had merely been tipped out of the chair. I refer to the uppermost burn mark which is different in appearance from the lower two

This from another post

The body of Nevill is in a most peculiar position. (see silhouette picture. Can someone post this not in forum files?) I believe if you were to lay him on his side he would be said to be in the foetal position. I think it most unlikely that he would have fallen in such a way as to land squarely in the scuttle. He could have collapsed missing the scuttle on either side this would be perfectly possible but a direct alignment improbable. The odds on this happening would I suggest be high. Perhaps if we have a physicist on the forum they could calculate the likely probability.

I believe Nevill died in a foetal position with his back to the AGA. Studies from the First World War and other studies show that humans dying in pain tend to adopt this position. I believe he was struck with a rifle which on the upstrokes connected with the underside of the mantel causing chips and possibly some scratching. These marks as opposed to others that may have been made later were on the underside rather than the facia and would only be visible by looking underneath.

I also propose that June tended Nevill at some stage. If you do not believe June was shot five times in bed this is clearly a possibility. It is also likely that she prayed over him. Wasn’t another bible found in the kitchen? It is also probable that she was covered in his blood through contact. Some remaining evidence of this is the placement of four seat cushions one atop another which I suggest was done to support his head where he lay. If you were trying to contain blood flow I am sure one would have been sufficient and there were other items which would have done a better job. She may have used a towel or some other material to preserve the cushions but it is more likely that the police added to the pile to hide any blood on the top cushion.

Given the heat from the Aga it is likely that he went into RM quite quickly. Unfortunately the police needed access to the Aga for the burning of the accoutrements they had used in their staging activities and this was proving too slow with him in the way. If they did any burning with him in situ the Aga would get very hot because it was designed for burning coal not material which combusts differently. (Burns with more flame). He had to be moved to speed up the process. SOCO and other teams were waiting to do their stuff..
« Last Edit: July 16, 2024, 07:37:PM by Bubo bubo »

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #398 on: July 16, 2024, 07:43:PM »
I spelled this out just 12 days ago in response to your post.

He was not on a stool he was balanced on the side of an upturned chair.

Here is part of an earlier post. I find the position of NB's head falling exactly on the scuttle improbable.

Of course there are other reasons for moving him e.g. to assist with death certification but perhaps more importantly to gain access to the fire box in the Aga to burn items (DB2 fire debris) However, these issues required him to be put in another position. Or did the long shot come up?

The problem is the margins for the final positioning are quite fine, with centimetres one way or another determining the final outcome. A small difference would mean he would miss the scuttle possibly even toppling it and we know he had no injuries to suggest his head/face hit the top of the scuttle with any force. Maybe some physicist could calculate the likelihood of such odds?

Neville looks as if he was in full rigor and the scuttle may have been required to ensure he was suitably balanced. The heat from the AGA would have speeded up the process of rigor mortis.

If this were the case, then if he was not supported his head would be touching the ground and his frozen leg position would mean the bottom of his feet would be facing upwards. He had been moved because otherwise gravity would have determined his positioning. The top half of his body would be heavier than the lower part. In these circumstances it would be obvious he had been moved. The middle of his body would be the fulcrum and he would be like a seesaw with one end heavier than the other.

Moving him would also facilitate the counting of how many times he had been shot. IMO the TFG burned evidence of their clean-up operation particularly any bloodied items in the Aga. For example, protective items as outlined in the fire debris contents. I doubt the jeans and what looks like a white towel, were the only materials used? Were they moved from the cushions so that the nursing scene was dismantled?

The coal scuttle appears to be on top of the jeans in the pictures I have seen.
When the police/SOCO started their cover-up the focus would be on trying to piece together, a scenario which had some semblance of reality as far as was possible and in as great a detail they could achieve. For this reason, I do not discount them firing additional shots to NB’s head to give credence to the fact that he had not been moved.

If Neville was moved this could have given rise to another problem. If as now seems more likely he had been burnt by the Aga on his back say by the drain tap (now identified by Boyce as parts of the firebox door), while being attacked or during the process of being moved, how he obtained these marks would be questioned since it would not be possible if he had merely been tipped out of the chair. I refer to the uppermost burn mark which is different in appearance from the lower two

This from another post

The body of Nevill is in a most peculiar position. (see silhouette picture. Can someone post this not in forum files?) I believe if you were to lay him on his side he would be said to be in the foetal position. I think it most unlikely that he would have fallen in such a way as to land squarely in the scuttle. He could have collapsed missing the scuttle on either side this would be perfectly possible but a direct alignment improbable. The odds on this happening would I suggest be high. Perhaps if we have a physicist on the forum they could calculate the likely probability.

I believe Nevill died in a foetal position with his back to the AGA. Studies from the First World War and other studies show that humans dying in pain tend to adopt this position. I believe he was struck with a rifle which on the upstrokes connected with the underside of the mantel causing chips and possibly some scratching. These marks as opposed to others that may have been made later were on the underside rather than the facia and would only be visible by looking underneath.

I also propose that June tended Nevill at some stage. If you do not believe June was shot five times in bed this is clearly a possibility. It is also likely that she prayed over him. Wasn’t another bible found in the kitchen? It is also probable that she was covered in his blood through contact. Some remaining evidence of this is the placement of four seat cushions one atop another which I suggest was done to support his head where he lay. If you were trying to contain blood flow I am sure one would have been sufficient and there were other items which would have done a better job. She may have used a towel or some other material to preserve the cushions but it is more likely that the police added to the pile to hide any blood on the top cushion.

Given the heat from the Aga it is likely that he went into RM quite quickly. Unfortunately the police needed access to the Aga for the burning of the accoutrements they had used in their staging activities and this was proving too slow with him in the way. If they did any burning with him in situ the Aga would get very hot because it was designed for burning coal not material which combusts differently. (Burns with more flame). He had to be moved to speed up the process. SOCO and other teams were waiting to do their stuff..

So do you think he was layed like this at the side of the AGA then Bubo in the foetal position?  So why hasn't Boyce got his man in the same or Similar Position and in  the  foetal position  when doing the tests?   I know what your going to say, it was just a means to show that the AGA could have caused the marks, that is rubbish and a very poor demonstration by Boyce  and then he has the Audacity to accuse the Police of moving Neville's body, with that cheap shot video.  They defy Gravity when they are in full rigor so don't need supporting.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=18734;image

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=18733;image

« Last Edit: July 17, 2024, 06:20:AM by Hardy Boy »

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13160
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #399 on: July 17, 2024, 03:21:PM »
It's been put forward as a submission,  that's why they are brought up,  Bamber's team are trying to say that the burn marks was caused by the AGA and the Police moved Neville,  so to others on here it is an interesting debate.

I agree Neither points to Jeremy or Sheila's Guilt on their own,  but if the Campaign team have evidence of Police corruption in Moving Neville i would say he will get his referal or Acquittal,  i don't think they have any evidence but Bubo Bubo seems confident?

I get where there going with it hardy but it's not compelling evidence. It's a good discussion but Jeremy and his team have thrown the kitchen sink at it

To be blunt to me it seems like too much money has been thrown at it to no avail.

If I end up being wrong il stand corrected. It's just an observation.
« Last Edit: July 17, 2024, 03:22:PM by ILB »
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #400 on: July 17, 2024, 03:27:PM »
I get where there going with it hardy but it's not compelling evidence. It's a good discussion but Jeremy and his team have thrown the kitchen sink at it

To be blunt to me it seems like too much money has been thrown at it to no avail.

If I end up being wrong il stand corrected. It's just an observation.


I think you may mean they threw the AGA at it? The kitchen sink stayed where it was.

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #401 on: July 17, 2024, 05:17:PM »
So do you think he was layed like this at the side of the AGA then Bubo in the foetal position?  So why hasn't Boyce got his man in the same or Similar Position and in  the  foetal position  when doing the tests?   I know what your going to say, it was just a means to show that the AGA could have caused the marks, that is rubbish and a very poor demonstration by Boyce  and then he has the Audacity to accuse the Police of moving Neville's body, with that cheap shot video.  They defy Gravity when they are in full rigor so don't need supporting.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=18734;image

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=18733;image

I do not know how he was positioned before he was moved. I merely suggested the foetal position based on historical information gained from WW1 given the agony he would have endured from all of his injuries.

Even if we do not know exactly his true position it is clear from the experiment that it only requires his upper back to be in contact irrespective of how the rest of his body is positioned. Further we do not know whether he was trapped/pinned in some way by furniture.

Your statement above is 'bollocks'. I know you like that word. Lets take an inanimate object like a piece of wood which is heavier at one end than the other. You are arguing against the laws of physics. The plank of wood would drop to the ground at the heavier end. That is the law of gravity and the human body whether alive or dead and in rigor would follow this rule.  Even a seesaw which is equally balanced when additional weight is applied to one end that it falls to the ground.

He was obviously not sitting in the chair that he straddles. If he tipped forward from a seated position the back of the chair would be across/over his back. The chair is on its side.

Here is a simple test you can do yourself at home. Turn a chair on its side. Then lay down over the chair with one leg either side and your lower body supported by the back of the chair. You will find that your legs do not bend at the knees the way NB's are shown and your head falls to the ground. He must have been in rigor at another location for him to be in such a configuration.

These facts show why his head had to be supported by the scuttle.

It is not incumbent on PB to give reasons for his movement and you will notice that he does not attribute that to the police. He just says the body must have been moved

« Last Edit: July 17, 2024, 05:23:PM by Bubo bubo »

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #402 on: July 17, 2024, 06:15:PM »
I do not know how he was positioned before he was moved. I merely suggested the foetal position based on historical information gained from WW1 given the agony he would have endured from all of his injuries.

Even if we do not know exactly his true position it is clear from the experiment that it only requires his upper back to be in contact irrespective of how the rest of his body is positioned. Further we do not know whether he was trapped/pinned in some way by furniture.

Your statement above is 'bollocks'. I know you like that word. Lets take an inanimate object like a piece of wood which is heavier at one end than the other. You are arguing against the laws of physics. The plank of wood would drop to the ground at the heavier end. That is the law of gravity and the human body whether alive or dead and in rigor would follow this rule.  Even a seesaw which is equally balanced when additional weight is applied to one end that it falls to the ground.

He was obviously not sitting in the chair that he straddles. If he tipped forward from a seated position the back of the chair would be across/over his back. The chair is on its side.

Here is a simple test you can do yourself at home. Turn a chair on its side. Then lay down over the chair with one leg either side and your lower body supported by the back of the chair. You will find that your legs do not bend at the knees the way NB's are shown and your head falls to the ground. He must have been in rigor at another location for him to be in such a configuration.

These facts show why his head had to be supported by the scuttle.

It is not incumbent on PB to give reasons for his movement and you will notice that he does not attribute that to the police. He just says the body must have been moved
Again you talk utter Bullshit, he say's that" there's a possibility that Neville Bambers Body was actually physically moved after the POLICE arrived at the scene and the evidence was changed for want of a better word".  You lie after lie with your utter Bullshit.  I said that they don't need supporting when in full rigor because you posted this,  He had been moved because otherwise gravity would have determined his positioning,  [i simply don't know what you mean, he had been moved because of gravity]  i don't need your bullshit education on the Laws of Physics thank you, your bullshit about the police shooting June and then moving Neville to access the fire box is enough Comedy for today.

If the position of the dead body during the primary relaxation is unusual with flexion at some major joints, it will remain rigidly in the same position during the stage of rigor mortis. If the rigor mortis is the well established stage, the flexed limbs continue to stay flexed and will defy gravity, even when the support beneath them is missing.

« Last Edit: July 17, 2024, 06:48:PM by Hardy Boy »

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #403 on: July 17, 2024, 06:28:PM »
I spelled this out just 12 days ago in response to your post.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,11621.msg564306.html#msg564306

He was not on a stool he was balanced on the side of an upturned chair.

Here is part of an earlier post. I find the position of NB's head falling exactly on the scuttle improbable.

Of course there are other reasons for moving him e.g. to assist with death certification but perhaps more importantly to gain access to the fire box in the Aga to burn items (DB2 fire debris) However, these issues required him to be put in another position. Or did the long shot come up?

The problem is the margins for the final positioning are quite fine, with centimetres one way or another determining the final outcome. A small difference would mean he would miss the scuttle possibly even toppling it and we know he had no injuries to suggest his head/face hit the top of the scuttle with any force. Maybe some physicist could calculate the likelihood of such odds?

Neville looks as if he was in full rigor and the scuttle may have been required to ensure he was suitably balanced. The heat from the AGA would have speeded up the process of rigor mortis.

If this were the case, then if he was not supported his head would be touching the ground and his frozen leg position would mean the bottom of his feet would be facing upwards. He had been moved because otherwise gravity would have determined his positioning. The top half of his body would be heavier than the lower part. In these circumstances it would be obvious he had been moved. The middle of his body would be the fulcrum and he would be like a seesaw with one end heavier than the other.

Moving him would also facilitate the counting of how many times he had been shot. IMO the TFG burned evidence of their clean-up operation particularly any bloodied items in the Aga. For example, protective items as outlined in the fire debris contents. I doubt the jeans and what looks like a white towel, were the only materials used? Were they moved from the cushions so that the nursing scene was dismantled?

The coal scuttle appears to be on top of the jeans in the pictures I have seen.
When the police/SOCO started their cover-up the focus would be on trying to piece together, a scenario which had some semblance of reality as far as was possible and in as great a detail they could achieve. For this reason, I do not discount them firing additional shots to NB’s head to give credence to the fact that he had not been moved.

If Neville was moved this could have given rise to another problem. If as now seems more likely he had been burnt by the Aga on his back say by the drain tap (now identified by Boyce as parts of the firebox door), while being attacked or during the process of being moved, how he obtained these marks would be questioned since it would not be possible if he had merely been tipped out of the chair. I refer to the uppermost burn mark which is different in appearance from the lower two

This from another post

The body of Nevill is in a most peculiar position. (see silhouette picture. Can someone post this not in forum files?) I believe if you were to lay him on his side he would be said to be in the foetal position. I think it most unlikely that he would have fallen in such a way as to land squarely in the scuttle. He could have collapsed missing the scuttle on either side this would be perfectly possible but a direct alignment improbable. The odds on this happening would I suggest be high. Perhaps if we have a physicist on the forum they could calculate the likely probability.

I believe Nevill died in a foetal position with his back to the AGA. Studies from the First World War and other studies show that humans dying in pain tend to adopt this position. I believe he was struck with a rifle which on the upstrokes connected with the underside of the mantel causing chips and possibly some scratching. These marks as opposed to others that may have been made later were on the underside rather than the facia and would only be visible by looking underneath.

I also propose that June tended Nevill at some stage. If you do not believe June was shot five times in bed this is clearly a possibility. It is also likely that she prayed over him. Wasn’t another bible found in the kitchen? It is also probable that she was covered in his blood through contact. Some remaining evidence of this is the placement of four seat cushions one atop another which I suggest was done to support his head where he lay. If you were trying to contain blood flow I am sure one would have been sufficient and there were other items which would have done a better job. She may have used a towel or some other material to preserve the cushions but it is more likely that the police added to the pile to hide any blood on the top cushion.

Given the heat from the Aga it is likely that he went into RM quite quickly. Unfortunately the police needed access to the Aga for the burning of the accoutrements they had used in their staging activities and this was proving too slow with him in the way. If they did any burning with him in situ the Aga would get very hot because it was designed for burning coal not material which combusts differently. (Burns with more flame). He had to be moved to speed up the process. SOCO and other teams were waiting to do their stuff..


Seriously what utter utter claptrap.  June Prayed over Neville  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
« Last Edit: July 17, 2024, 06:31:PM by Hardy Boy »

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Re: Emma Morris
« Reply #404 on: July 17, 2024, 06:50:PM »
Again you talk utter Bullshit, he say's that" there's a possibility that Neville Bambers Body was actually physically moved after the POLICE arrived at the scene and the evidence was changed for want of a better word".  You lie after lie with your utter Bullshit.  I said that they don't need supporting when in full rigor because you posted this,  He had been moved because otherwise gravity would have determined his positioning,  [i simply don't know what you mean, he had been moved because of gravity]  i don't need your bullshit education on the Laws of Physics thank you, your bullshit about the police shooting June and then moving Neville to access the fire box is enough Comedy for today.

Temper Temper. Cut out the swearing please. I was saying that if he had not been moved and supported his head would be touching the floor because of gravity. Otherwise you have to believe that it was pure chance that his head fell conveniently into the scuttle. Not impossible but because there was no damage present on his face when it hit the edges of the scuttle at force, with his full weight behind it, he must have been posed. His words do not specifically say it was the police who moved him. I have already posted that he could have been moved by order of the doctor in order to certify death.