Why did Stokenchurch take place prior to the appeal?
I would have thought that an inquiry would only take place on the chance of Bamber getting his convictions overturned at that appeal. This was pre appeal. There was no telling he was getting his convictions overturned and as we know he didn't end up doing so.
I have read transcripts of Stokenchurch interviews and they are before Bambers winter 2002 appeal. ( Believe in the summer of 2002)
DCI mcdermaid stated on the documentary she and her team spent 18 months on the case?
Isn't it usual procedure to look into suspected police wrongdoing in the event of an overturning of a conviction?