« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Question for JackieD  (Read 1833 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Question for JackieD
« Reply #15 on: October 23, 2021, 07:14:AM »
Quote from: lookout on October 22, 2021, 09:00:PM




All the guilters happen to be nasty for some unknown reason.
No we respect you really. You're a barometer not a weathercock..
Logged

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Question for JackieD
« Reply #16 on: October 23, 2021, 08:44:AM »
Quote from: Steve_uk on October 23, 2021, 07:14:AM
No we respect you really. You're a barometer not a weathercock..





Well there you are. That's novel.
Logged

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44394
Re: Question for JackieD
« Reply #17 on: October 23, 2021, 12:40:PM »
It looks like JackieD is not going to discuss the forensic evidence.

Which is disappointing. You would expect some input since 2017.
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4822
Re: Question for JackieD
« Reply #18 on: October 23, 2021, 06:20:PM »
Quote from: Adam on October 23, 2021, 12:40:PM
It looks like JackieD is not going to discuss the forensic evidence.

Which is disappointing. You would expect some input since 2017.

Can you point me to it Adam I would like to see it?
Logged

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44394
Re: Question for JackieD
« Reply #19 on: October 23, 2021, 06:31:PM »
Quote from: Rob_ on October 23, 2021, 06:20:PM
Can you point me to it Adam I would like to see it?

 ;D

You are as bad as Lookout. Playing it dim & pretending not to be aware of the 74 pieces of 'sourced' forensic evidence.
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Question for JackieD
« Reply #20 on: October 23, 2021, 06:38:PM »
Quote from: Adam on October 23, 2021, 06:31:PM
;D

You are as bad as Lookout. Playing it dim & pretending not to be aware of the 74 pieces of 'sourced' forensic evidence.





That's your excuse, you're full of them !
Logged

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4822
Re: Question for JackieD
« Reply #21 on: October 23, 2021, 06:56:PM »
Quote from: Adam on October 23, 2021, 06:31:PM
;D

You are as bad as Lookout. Playing it dim & pretending not to be aware of the 74 pieces of 'sourced' forensic evidence.

Give me your top five or ten pieces of forensic evidence Adam and I will reply to them.
Logged

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44394
Re: Question for JackieD
« Reply #22 on: October 23, 2021, 07:21:PM »
Quote from: Rob_ on October 23, 2021, 06:56:PM
Give me your top five or ten pieces of forensic evidence Adam and I will reply to them.

There is no top 5 or 10. They all carry equal weight.

But appreciate Bamber has focused on the silencer since the mid 90's. Why? The relatives handed it in.
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4822
Re: Question for JackieD
« Reply #23 on: October 23, 2021, 07:41:PM »
Quote from: Adam on October 23, 2021, 07:21:PM
There is no top 5 or 10. They all carry equal weight.

But appreciate Bamber has focused on the silencer since the mid 90's. Why? The relatives handed it in.

If they all carry equal weight  :)) then I will pick five at random
Logged

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44394
Re: Question for JackieD
« Reply #24 on: October 23, 2021, 07:47:PM »
Quote from: Rob_ on October 23, 2021, 07:41:PM
If they all carry equal weight  :)) then I will pick five at random

Five is better than one, which the CT do.

Unfortunately all need to be negated. Which is why Lookout & JackieD won't discuss the forensic evidence & David just copies & pastes a weird paragraph.
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Question for JackieD
« Reply #25 on: October 23, 2021, 08:23:PM »
Quote from: Adam on October 23, 2021, 07:47:PM
Five is better than one, which the CT do.

Unfortunately all need to be negated. Which is why Lookout & JackieD won't discuss the forensic evidence & David just copies & pastes a weird paragraph.





I can't discuss something that clearly isn't there to discuss  ::)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »