Author Topic: Questions for Steve  (Read 5621 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #90 on: October 23, 2021, 07:59:PM »

If these results had been from swabs of JB's hands you would have been jumping up and down for joy!
There is no joy in this case. It's not Charlie Chaplin material. Jeremy wore gloves, as confirmed in Julie's statement.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #91 on: October 23, 2021, 08:25:PM »
There is no joy in this case. It's not Charlie Chaplin material. Jeremy wore gloves, as confirmed in Julie's statement.






No fibres found----no gloves and no fingerprints.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #92 on: October 23, 2021, 08:41:PM »





No fibres found----no gloves and no fingerprints.
As Oscar Wilde stated: "The truth is rarely plain and never simple.." Julie poured her heart out to Stan Jones that September evening, the unvarnished truth warts and all, making for distressing reading in parts, but with an air of authenticity as she discoursed in the last chance saloon. She alluded to gloves and even went further, mentioning a detail which had never appeared in the mass media, namely that a glove had come off in the fight with Nevill, necessitating a wipe of the gun, which removed Sheila's fingerprints therefrom.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #93 on: October 23, 2021, 10:14:PM »

Can we have some moderation on this forum for this obvious troll who is more than likely the troll Matt

I thought you had me on ignore!  I said you wouldn't have the discipline to follow through.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #94 on: October 24, 2021, 10:04:AM »
And your attitude stinks !!

At least I speak the truth as it's people like you who wouldn't know the truth if it poked you in the eye !

Once anyone here starts with their insults/ abuse I know I've hit a chord which brings out the nasty person that you are !

Why don't you try engaging your brain before you post and consider whether what your're posting is factually correct and whether you can provide supporting evidence rather than flooding the board with misinformation.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #95 on: October 24, 2021, 10:06:AM »
Jackie at my time of life I don't have to tolerate this ill-mannered oaf. What a nasty piece of work it is !!

And no one here wants the board flooded with misinformation.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #96 on: October 24, 2021, 10:07:AM »
People/Things like these CLEARLY come on this forum at very sensitive times to disrupt and stop genuine posters who want to learn more about this horrendous miscarriage of justice case

Anyone who research this case knows for a FACT this is an unsafe conviction

That is undeniable

Lets hope the review commission agrees with you!

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #97 on: October 24, 2021, 10:09:AM »
Lookout these trolls know the truth about the murders is so close to coming out. So many great producers and documentary makers queuing up to rubbish the Carol Anne Lee and Louis Theroux efforts

The general public won’t be disappointed by the actual truth

Seems to me just about every player has contributed to either Lee or Theroux so who are these great producers and documentary makers going to include?  JackieD and Lookout  ;D

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44394
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #98 on: October 24, 2021, 10:13:AM »
Seems to me just about every player has contributed to either Lee or Theroux so who are these great producers and documentary makers going to include?  JackieD and Lookout  ;D

JackieD said she wanted to make a 6 part documentary.

The first 5 episodes would be on Julie.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #99 on: October 24, 2021, 10:21:AM »
I received a PM when joining the forum. Part of it saying Lookout was dim & another (former poster) was one of the biggest Bamber defenders.

I don't believe Lookout is as dim as she makes out. Just a lazy poster who wants to deflect posts from guilters. This is through a combination of unsourced new statements which contradict sourced information & repeatedly asking the same questions.

I am surprised Lookout and JackieD are not part of Bamber's support group.  Maybe they are and do things behind the scenes!

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #100 on: October 24, 2021, 10:38:AM »
I have been looking through it Cc if you don't mind me saying it appears very biased and incorrect in places.

For example it talks about the lead content on the hand swabs, but makes no mention of the copper content matching the two testers loading 18 bullets into a magazine?

It also states that SC's hands were perfectly clean? but PV in his hand written notes says there was a blooded palm print on her nightdress from her right hand?

If I am missed something hopefully you can correct me?

Re the hand swabs the court (at trial) was told

216. At trial, Mr Rivlin QC, who appeared for the appellant at trial, sought to counteract this evidence in two ways. First in cross-examination of the scientist, he drew his attention to traces of other elements in the test results from the swabs, iron and copper, and queried whether these were significant. The scientist said that they were no more than might have been obtained from the atmosphere. He did not think the copper could have come from the bullets unless they had been scratched. The other defence approach to this evidence was the theory of ritualistic washing to which reference has earlier been made.

As I think I said in another post, the trial judge questioned the HO pathologist re his notes pertaining to blood stains on Sheila's hands.  I would recommend you read his trial testimony in the library here.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #101 on: October 24, 2021, 10:40:AM »
What a pair of sad individuals you two are. Why not go back to your own forum if you don't agree with anything here, instead of disrupting this one with your snide comments ? You know your own best !!