When everyone read JB s letter to mike a lot of people thought it wasn't very nice but I didn't at all I totally understand what he was saying and I am sure mike knows lots more than he puts on here but if JB asks him not to he can't and he wouldn't. JB even gives the impression that the ccrc are trying to point out exactly what he needs to get an appeal. I know nothing in depth about the legal system except my horrendous experience as a juror. But I know stuff is happening but I don't even ask anything anymore in case I say something that I shouldn't but as I have saud before the best thing ever to come out of this would be the whole thing was a tragic accident. I am confused now when I read people saying it's too late for new evidence to be considered even if it's significant. I couldn't say something on here when I have been told something in confidance and Mike must find it so difficult when he can't put certain things on here because he has been asked not too. I did find the reaction to JB s letter to mike very strange because I am sure they disagree on a number of points but mike and JB were locked up together for a long time and mike probably understands JB better than anyone and has absolute belief there has been a miscarriage of justice so I trust mike when he cannot answer everything
I agree with you, Jackie, Mike simply cannot reveal everything he knows or all of the data he has, Jeremy Bamber's legal team will almost certainly have stipulated that and Mike must respect that.
With the prosecution having access to thousands of documents to which the defence are denied access, it's not hard to understand why the defence would not wish to reveal all aspects of their case. The prosecution, thanks to the much abused system of pii, are holding most of the aces. So the defence would be crazy to reveal all of theirs.