Author Topic: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?  (Read 155591 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1020 on: November 09, 2019, 07:51:PM »
Oh, hang on though. The stairs turned so the killer could have shot Nevill in his front even if the killer was on  the landing.

Yes or he could have been shot first coming up the stairs and as he turned to flee.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1021 on: November 09, 2019, 07:58:PM »
Yes or he could have been shot first coming up the stairs and as he turned to flee.

Well there was a cartridge on the landing, so the gun was fired from there. However, there were a further 12 cartridges in the main bedroom, so Nevill was also shot either in the bedroom or just outside the door of the bedroom.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13151
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1022 on: November 09, 2019, 07:59:PM »
Why? His clothes were downstairs, he could have changed into them after the shower.
but if he was returning to WHF for a shower after taking the dogs out he wouldn't have had chance for one would he? Jeremy was laying in wait....
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1023 on: November 09, 2019, 08:00:PM »
Well there was a cartridge on the landing, so the gun was fired from there. However, there were a further 12 cartridges in the main bedroom, so Nevill was also shot either in the bedroom or just outside the door of the bedroom.

Yes, I agree, point being, I don't think he was in the bedroom when the shooting started. 
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1024 on: November 09, 2019, 08:02:PM »
but if he was returning to WHF for a shower after taking the dogs out he wouldn't have had chance for one would he? Jeremy was laying in wait....

Why not? The point is that I think he waited until Nevill was in the shower. The shower would mask the sound of the shots and any shouting but the main thing is that Nevill would be out of the way.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1025 on: November 09, 2019, 08:05:PM »
Why not? The point is that I think he waited until Nevill was in the shower. The shower would mask the sound of the shots and any shouting but the main thing is that Nevill would be out of the way.

So you think that Nevill was never in the bed that night?

There were a pair of socks on the floor on his side of the bed, but they might have been there from the night before. There was also an indent on his pillow, but again that could be there from the night before.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13781
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1026 on: November 09, 2019, 08:08:PM »
So you think that Nevill was never in the bed that night?

There were a pair of socks on the floor on his side of the bed, but they might have been there from the night before. There was also an indent on his pillow, but again that could be there from the night before.

He was found at the scene wearing his pyjamas.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13151
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1027 on: November 09, 2019, 08:09:PM »
Why not? The point is that I think he waited until Nevill was in the shower. The shower would mask the sound of the shots and any shouting but the main thing is that Nevill would be out of the way.
the fact is though nevill was in his bedwear. Did Jeremy allow him to change into his pyjamas before murdering him??? It's much more plausible and believable that nevill went to bed that night Caroline love. Unless Jeremy forced him at gunpoint to dress in his bedwear before killing him and tearing his pyjama top..
« Last Edit: November 09, 2019, 08:12:PM by ilovebooze »
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1028 on: November 09, 2019, 08:11:PM »
He was found at the scene wearing his pyjamas.

I think Caroline's idea is that he had a shower and changed into his PJs in the shower room before going upstairs.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13151
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1029 on: November 09, 2019, 08:12:PM »
I think Caroline's idea is that he had a shower and changed into his PJs in the shower room before going upstairs.
no if you look earlier back she had the idea he'd took crispy and Bruce for an evening stroll before coming back for a shower. Scroll up
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1030 on: November 09, 2019, 08:21:PM »
It seems unlikely to me that Nevill would put his PJs in the downstairs shower room before going out with the dogs.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1031 on: November 09, 2019, 08:27:PM »
Poor Nevill hadn't got the time to put on his pyjamas properly. He couldn't have had his jacket on when burns were found down the back of his neck or on his arm as the jacket didn't show any sign of burn holes.
His pyjama bottoms were rolled down to his ankles when he was discovered by police. So Nevill had been in the process of putting on his night clothes when he was attacked-----which would have been enough to have sent him off-balance at only being half-dressed/undressed.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33775
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1032 on: November 09, 2019, 08:30:PM »
no if you look earlier back she had the idea he'd took crispy and Bruce for an evening stroll before coming back for a shower. Scroll up


In the days prior to en suite bathrooms, at the Bamber's social level, it's not out of the question that gentlemen would allow their wives the privacy of an upstairs bathroom whilst they used the downstairs shower room.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1033 on: November 09, 2019, 08:31:PM »
Steve it's simple common sense logic. I've never disputed the police weren't looking for that silencer. But it should have been discovered. It was in a cupboard mate, not concealed by any stretch of the imagination
It was a big gun cupboard at the recess, probably in darkness. Remember the police had been presented with a fait accompli and were probably just going through the motions of searching a large, imposing Georgian building.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33775
Re: Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?
« Reply #1034 on: November 09, 2019, 08:32:PM »
Poor Nevill hadn't got the time to put on his pyjamas properly. He couldn't have had his jacket on when burns were found down the back of his neck or on his arm as the jacket didn't show any sign of burn holes.
His pyjama bottoms were rolled down to his ankles when he was discovered by police. So Nevill had been in the process of putting on his night clothes when he was attacked-----which would have been enough to have sent him off-balance at only being half-dressed/undressed.

Are you saying he had time to put the jacket on after his neck had been burned?