By Billy Middleton (in black)
So did everyone who actually knows the case with the exception of retired SIO Roy Lambert, who has now found a voice on the subject and started proclaiming arrogantly in the media to have never once doubted Simon’s guilt, did everyone else including myself, those involved in the Rough Justice documentary, the CCRC, the DPP and many, many others get it wrong?
YES - they all got it wrong! That includes you Billy Middleton! SIO Roy Lambert got the right man - however the motive was sexual as opposed to a burglary gone wrong!It’s possible, and without knowing the circumstances and details of the confession it can’t be and mustn’t be ruled out.
See aboveHowever despite how readily people think ‘no one would confess if they didn’t do it’, that can’t be ruled out either, not least because just one of the many pieces of evidence pointing away from Simon’s guilt is that someone else confessed many years ago before Simon was convicted
No one confessed many years ago - SH & the Hall family threw that suggestion in at the very beginning in order to attempt to take away the heat from SH! Which is where the deception started.
– quite simply one of them must be false,
SH was guilty so the other was a red herring!yet even then Roy Lambert didn’t doubt his assumption that Simon was guilty
because Roy Lambert was right all along - Roy Lambert had obviously recognised the dysfunctional family dynamics very early on! and perhaps that’s why none of the other strands of evidence which potentially could have linked that person to the crime were never followed up –
there were no other strands of evidence unless you are referring to the metal pole found in next doors garden (used to smash the window) which was never forensically tested and the excrement found in the back garden because he was so sure he was right and everyone else was wrong.
He was right and everyone else was wrong!DNA, fingerprints,
there was no DNA or fingerprints - SH was forensically aware (not unlike yourself http://www.shetlandtimes.co.uk/2009/03/20/only-fiend-could-murder-baby-trial) and had put his socks on his hands and disposed of everything he wore that morning on the Monday - the leather jacket, shirt, trousers, shoes, socks the lot.. footprints along the accepted escape route found at the scene, none of which matched Simon’s,
Yes they did - the footprints did belong to SH - he had disposed of the shoes he wore that night so the police were unable to match the prints to any of the shoes he did have. He was not wearing boots as Lynn Hall suggested in her statement - she was wrong/or lyingstomach contents pointing to an earlier time of death
wrong which coincided with a disturbance heard by many neighbours,
wrong againnot a trace with the exception of the infamous flock fibres which formed the sole basis of the prosecution’s case against him hence Mr Starmer’s continued quote “The one crucial link is the fibre evidence. Break this and the case disappears.”. You would expect then that the fibre evidence was strong and compelling, yet one slide claimed by the original experts to contain 1000+ such fibres actually contained absolutely none, zero, zilch, de nada, squat, when the CCRC’s expert reviewed it, other slides were broken and stuck together with sticky tape, and what had been described as lime green polyester was actually carbon black. That is the credibility of the fibre evidence and the only evidence Roy Lambert could present so sure as he was of Simon’s guilt in the face of everything else, and it is that level of contradiction of the original evidence that the appeal courts upheld his conviction on describing the original forensics as ‘incomplete’ rather than completely and utterly false.
Whilst the green fibres were carbon black as opposed to green - they did belong to SH. He did go into Tesco's earlier that day to buy a new pair of trousers - SH described it as a 'fluke' that the police failed to pick him up on the CCTV. Tiernan Coyle was wrong. SH did not admit to the Zenith burglary until November 2012. SH & the Hall family sat on this evidence. SH eventually stated he did not tell the police or his legal team about the burglary through fear the fibres at Zenith would match the fibres at the murder scene.
SH had a history for violence.
It’s as if in some people’s eyes, Simon’s change of plea has miraculously also morphed every forensically testable trace of his being including his DNA to match all of the evidence pointing away from him, the fibre evidence ceases to have any meaning, and all of the questions so many experienced people had have been answered.
See aboveWhich is more probable, that after Simon’s last appeal was rejected, knowing that it was the best chance he was ever going to have, which was followed my months and months of psychological abuse and mind games by the person who drove every last one of the thousands of supporters he had away with vile and malicious on and offline feuds such that he finally couldn’t take any more, he cracked,
These are your own projections Billy Middleton. How could I have driven thousands and thousands of supporters away one by one. Can you expand on this? The mind games and psychological abuse you have referred is what SH did to me. Not the other way round. From the moment I learned of the zenith burglary the mind games and psychological abuse increased in order to keep me from figuring it all out. When someone is caught telling lie after lie they eventually run out of excuses. I would however like you to expand on the vile and malicious on and offline feuds, if you can. If you are referring to you and me I have already explained - I believe you are a con artist who murdered your baby daughter after setting 2 fires in your house if you are referring to me and the family of SH - they weren't honest and the smear campaign they instigated against me was in order to stop the truth from surfacing and their secrets from coming out - not dissimilar to you and your secrets
or that Roy Lambert was right all along despite all of the evidence to the contrary and everyone else was wrong? I don’t discount the possibility that I’m wrong, but I remain as yet unconvinced that I am
of course you do because you are one of those people who would never admit to your wrong doingand if further details are forthcoming I will reassess it then
no you won't, you aren't man enough to admit you made it up you will disappear and go quiet like you always do when caught out lyingThat doesn’t mean I don’t respect the fact that a confession has been made or refuse to accept it no matter what,
that's exactly what it means - as I've said before Billy Middleton would never admit to his wrong doingsI’m simply unconvinced on the evidence that it’s true or that it was made by a sound mind
Again your own projections Billy Middleton and not dissimilar to the way you 'played things' after you started those fires. People like you who have ulterior motives and agendas need to continually deceive others in order to stop your own crimes and secrets from being exposed. – particularly considering he was in receipt of medication for depression
No he wasn't!
and had recently been rushed to hospital following an overdose which may or may not have been accidental.
He confessed in July he overdosed in February I personally lost respect for Simon some time ago but I didn’t lose the compassion and humanity I would need to before I could ignore the above, the facts of the past don’t get erased by the words of the present.
I lost respect for you when I realised you are a con artist who likes to play the victim when caught out lying and you are a man who preys on the vulnerabilities of others. I believe you should have been found guilty, not - not proven! You got away with murder imo. I do not believe you capable of showing compassion or humility to anyone! You are a fraud and a coward! Imo you are a pariah. You think of yourself before others. http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/fury-as-dad-of-annalise-middleton-sets-1019199#FqAESWytkXCzZ8ee.97 You latched on to the wrongly accused for personal gratification and self gain.
Why did you loose respect for SH? By failing to expand on this you are further deceiving others. You lost respect for SH for a reason.. Why? http://www.wronglyaccusedperson.org.uk/2013/08/mojs-simon-halls-confession/
